March 01, 2011

The NATIP Wishes

Envisioning a greater role for the timber industry by 2020, the Government has commissioned a study to create a viable vision for the Timber industry from 2009 till 2020.

Known as the National Timber Industry Plan (NATIP), it proposes 7 thrusts for the achievement of its qualitative and quantitative targets.


The overriding mission of NATIP is that come 2020, Malaysian timber exports will achieve the value of RM53 billion. The qualitative vision is to achieve this target via a 40% contribution from upstream products and 60% from downstream products. Whether this is a tall order or need to be pruned to current realities will depend how the critical issues facing the industry can be effectively resolved.

The three critical challenges must be met strategically and expeditiously. Failing to do so with earnest will certainly makes such mission and vision a pipe dream.

The NATIP thrusts broadly embodies qualitative aspects. Each thrust incorporates a status report, a list of issues and challenges,the way forward and policy directions.

These are the thrusts:

Thrust 1: Industry Structure
Thrust 2: The Supply of Raw Materials
Thrust 3: Innovation and Technology
Thrust 4: Marketing and Innovation
Thrust 5: Marketing and Promotion
Thrust 6: Funding and Incentives
Thrust 7: Bumiputra Participation

Excluding the negative impact of exogenous factors, the 7 thrusts of the NATIP can be realisable and achievable  if they are passionately pursued i n an enabling environment.

The Timber Industry-The Crtiical Challenges

The challenges confronting the Malaysian Timber industry can be categorised into three. The first category is on raw materials while the second on labour resources. The third category is with regards to marketing and promotion of Malaysian timber products.


Of the three category, the most critical challenge is with regard to labour and then raw materials. The third category is a longer term challenge incorporating manifold strategies.

The shortage of raw materials current affect production as well as impede long term planning. While Peninsular Malaysia has banned the export of round logs, the export of logs is still allowed in both Sabah and Sarawak. This dichotomous situation has lead to the continuous outflow of raw materials in low value added form onto the international market from these two states while timber manufacturing companies from both Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah and Sarawak are facing acute shortages of raw materials to work on. On the long term, this demotivates investment into high value downstream processing of timber and puts a stump on the growth of the timber industry.

There have been concrete moves to promote forest plantation to resolve this raw material issue. However, the risk here are high and more need to be done to attract investment into this activity. To alleviate the risk issue, grants-in-aid from the government  as well as interest free loan should be made available to investors.

The research to identify other non-commercial species of timber is an on -going activity of the forest departments and the timber research fraternity. This is more a long term option.

Unless Sabah and Sarawak legislate to prohibit round log exports, the most ideal national plan document to move the industry forward  will only be delusional. There need to be some form of understanding between the Federal Government and the two state governments so that a planned cutback of timber log exports can be implemented for the growth of the timber industry.

The labour issue is the most contentious. An over-reliance over labour in this industry for such a long time is proving to be a bane as locals do not want to involved themselves in this industry and when  foreign labour has become a much sought commodity. Any policy measure to assist the industry from this aspect will be short term and relying on labour on the long term will be self-defeating. The way out is to go into mechanisation and automation processes.

To motivate industry players to pursue mechanisation and automation,the government must be innovative in its funding and fiscal initiatives. Suggestions like using part of the foreign worker levy to set up a trust fund to finance technology adoption, innovation and automation as well as a Commodity Bank to assist in this direction must be seriously considered by the Government.

Currently, general workers can be recruited from other source countries to work in the timber industry. Statistics from the Home Ministry has shown that lately, there are fewer foreign workers from source countries like Nepal and Vietnam. The fast growing economy of India has attracted Nepalese, Sri Lankan and Bangladesh to work in India which is closer to their countries. Similarly, the Vietnamese are staying home because of their rapid economic growth.

Even so, a good source country to consider on a longer term will still be Bangladesh. However, the government must take cognizant of the potential social problems that can be created in the recruitment of Bangladesh workers.

Marketing and Promotion is the third challenge confronting the industry. Where once industry were contented to be contract manufacturers for overseas firms, that kind of strategy will not be expedient in the long run. As skills are developed both from the shop floor and from industrial training institutes such as WISDEC, industry players must seriously think of positioning themselves as Malaysian product manufacturer in their own right. Issues like innovative designs and own brand manufacturing should be the next targets on the movement up the value chain. The time has come for more strategic marketing and promotion of  Malaysian timber products.

Apart from government support to showcase our global quality products at international timber product fairs, genuine attempts at strategic marketing and promotion alliance must be forged. Here, Malaysian timber promotion agencies and associations can play their role with their international counterparts to work out a win-win platform that is sustainable. On the part of government, FTAs would be a good place to start.

Timber Industry-Structure and Characteristics


This is the Character and Structure of the Malaysian Timber Industry

The industry can be divided into the upstream and downstream sector.  Whereas the upstream sector is chracterised by the systematic and sustainable harvesting of natural forest and forest plantation, the downstream features three levels of processing. Of the primary activities, this will include processing of raw materials (logs) into sawn timber, plywood, veneer, fibreboard and particleboard. Some 60% of these are exported.
Secondary and tertiary processing will include furniture manufacturing, mouldings, flooring, laminated timber, builders’ joinery and carpentry  Some 40% of these outputs are exported.
The industry currently continues to be labour- intensive. There is low mechanisation or use of automated systems. Of the 300,000 workers in the timber industry, about 175,000 or 58% are foreign workers.

                                     
Skewed Over-dependence on Foreign Labour in the Industry

While young local workers shun the industry because of its ‘dirty, dreadful, demeaning, dull and dangerous’ label and image, a looming issue is the current scarcity of foreign workers to be recruited from the source countries for the local timber industry. Foreign Indonesian workers are now harder to recruit. As the prices of most commodities continue to rise, the plantations in Indonesia are willing to pay higher wages to their nationals and this has stemmed the outflow of labour to Malaysia. This overdependence of the timber industry on foreign workers is critical at the moment and worrisome in the long run. It will negate the growth of this industry and its contribution to the national economy in many aspects.

English: Heed The Headhunters

Now, this is  crucial.

 If the people who are hiring says that English is important-believe them.

And so it goes that headhunters are in agreement with  Mahathir  that mastering English will not make
Malaysians less patriotic.

Recruitment consultants said Malaysians will lose out in the global commerce game if the nation’s
education system fails to emphasise English.

“We agree totally that mastering English will not make Malaysians less patriotic. In fact, it should be the
reverse.

“It gives Malaysians the opportunity to extol the many good things about the country in more than one
language,” said Malcolm Poole, director of multinational headhunter agency MRI Network Sdn Bhd.

Poole added that more multinational companies are basing their regional operations here.
“Hence, the ability to follow technical and scientific publications in English is essential,” he said.

Consulting director of Career Builders Consulting Sdn Bhd Gopa­lan Nair said even though Bahasa
Malaysia has been accepted as a unifying language that promotes nation building, English is important
for commerce in a globalised world.

“We should not shy away from it,” said Gopalan.

Kelly Services managing director Melissa Norman described limited proficiency in English as highly
detrimental and a handicap in business.

This is again another wake-up call. Unless you are really deaf in the ear, ensure your children pick up the English language.

Berjaya Retail Performs Okay


Berjaya Retail Berhad (BJR) has just released its Q4, 2010 results. Compared to Q4, 2009; revenue rose by RM39.33 million. This represents a 9% better performance.

Net Profit was RM13.661 million, RM898,000 better than the last quarter. This represents a 7% increase. Basic earning per share has also moved up to 0.91 sen from 0.85 sen.

On a year-on-year appraisal, revenue has risen from RM1, 542,183 in 2009 to 
RM1,719,841 for the year ending 2010. Similarly net profit rose by RM4.98 million to RM52.43 million from RM47.46. Basic earnings climbed from 3.17 sen to 3.5 sen.

My view is that BJR is performing fairly well given the competitve retail environment in Malaysia.

Looking at the low price of 42 sen, perhaps it is time to collect some more of this share.

The Malaysian Timber Industry

The Malaysian Timber Industry has its humble beginning as an upstream industry that export sawn logs, saw-milling and plywood. It was fragmented and characterised by small family-owned establishments mostly operating saw mills. They were labour intensive and do not use much modern mechanisation  and automation.

It was only when the furniture sub-sector became a runaway success story that the timber industry began to claim a more significant stake in growing the national economy.

In 2008, timber contributed 3.7% to total merchandise export with an export market value of RM 22.5 billion. It employed more than 300,000 workers (3.5% of total employment)and constituted 4.07% of the GDP of the nation that year.


If not for a total ban of cut log export from Peninsular Malaysia, the growth of the timber industry would not have been that momentous. This policy immediately cuts away the ground from which foreign competitors obtained raw materials from Malaysia to develop downstream products that actually competes with Malaysian wood products in the global market places. More importantly, for the first time, investors in the industry could plan to go into downstream processing because of a stable supply of raw materials.

Even so, investments in the timber industry has been on the decline. From investment statistics provided by MIDA, investments in 2009 has diminished compared to 2007 and 2008.  In terms of investment in furniture it has shrunk 43% from RM309.1 million in 2007 to RM174.7 million in 2009. Similarly investments in panel products have slid by 79%  from RM766.5 million to RM162.7 million in 2009 while investment in non-wood products had slipped 75% from RM233.8 million to RM56.7 million in 2009.


                                           Investments in Timber Industry 2007-09 (MIDA)

Apart from raw materials sourced from natural jungles, timber is also obtained from cash crop plantations such as oil palm and rubber estates. Lately, forest plantations are being developed to strategically provide  timber resources to the industrial sector that are not only sustainable but legal.

Saving and Repeal.



 These are the two last rules of the Commissioners for Oaths 1993.

Rule 24 is a savings rule. For Commissioners for Oaths appointed prior to April 1993 who are not public officers, they will continue the functions of a Commissioner until the 31st December 1993. 

For Commisioners who are public officers, their appointment shall cease on 30th June 1993.

Rule 25: This is a  rule  to repeal  the Commissioners for Oaths Rules,1988.

Commissioner for Oaths-Miscellany


Part XII  of the Commissioners for Oaths,1993 discusses the forms in the Schedule, a saving provision and a repeal of an earlier set of rules.
 
Rule 23 refers to the 10 forms in the Schedule.

What are these forms?

Form 1: This is the form used when someone applies to become a Commissioner of Oaths. It lists the particulars of the applicant and the documents that must be supplied along with his or her application. It also incorporates a Statutory Declaration to be made by the applicant.

Form 2:  This form is used in the appointment of a Commissioner for Oaths for a public officer. A recent photograph must be attached to the form and the appointment will be signed by the Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court of Malaysia.

Form 3: This form is used in the appointment of a Commissioner for Oaths for other persons not a public officer. . A recent photograph must be attached to the form and the appointment will be signed by the Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court of Malaysia.

Form 4:  This is a reappointment application to be a Commissioner for Oaths. Apart from the need to furnish personal particulars again, the applicant must enclosed a money order/crossed cheque of RM120.00/RM240. A Statutory Declaration is also required in this application.

Form 5:  This form explains what are the information to be placed on an identification tag, the colour of the background as well as wordings and the dimensions of the tag.

Form 6: This form shows what a julat is and what is the text required in a julat.

Form 7: This form shows what should be written in a register to be kept by a Commissioner. It must have information like the date when a person seeks your service, his name and identity card/passport number, the nature of the documents administered, the number of exhibits, the fees charged and the signature of the deponent or maker of the document.

Form 8:  This form is the Report of by a court officer duly delegated to do such an inspection and investigation.

Form 9:  This form describes the technical specification of the seal of a Commissioner other than a public officer.

Form 9A: This form describes the technical specification of the seal of a Commissioner who is a public officer.

Pay the Penalty



Every Commissioner for Oaths must be responsible and act in that manner too. 

Any infraction in behaviour or of the Commissioners for Oaths rules, 1993 and you will pay the penalty.

Part XI expressly states that a Commissioner who fails to comply with the following rules 11,12,14,15,16,19 and 21 will have to ‘face the music’. When he is found guilty for any of these offences and convicted, he can be fined not exceeding RM1, 000 or to an imprisonment term not exceeding 6 months. He can also be both fined and imprisoned.

Let us look what are these Rules.

Rule 11: An offence to function as a Commissioner who are also solicitors and advocates for persons  if they are representing such persons in court as their solicitor and advocate.

Rule 12: An offence to function as a Commissioner for Rule 12 (a) and 12(b) for documents prepared by the Commissioner himself/herself.

Rule 13: For poor conduct and negligently performing duties as a Commissioner.

Rule 14: For not maintaining a register or poorly maintaining one and not submitting it to the Registrar on time or on request.

Rule 15:  For changing address of business without prior consent of the Lord President in writing.

Rule16: Not displaying the letter of appointment in the specified form and manner.

Rule 19: Seal and identification numbers not in order as specified by Rule 19.

Rule 21: Not following the rate of fees and conditions for receiving such fees