September 15, 2010

2011- A Time to Reflect


Next year marks an important milestone in the history of this country, for it will be 500 years since the fall of the Malacca sultanate and the start of colonisation.

Yes, half a millennium ago. Five centuries. Quincentennial. Twenty- five score years. Whichever way we look at it, that turn of events should not pass unnoticed for some special and most significant reasons -- the lessons from history as they all say.

It was in 1511 that the thriving port city of Malacca fell to the Portuguese, forcing its ruler, Sultan Mahmud Shah, to flee to a neighbouring state and ending more than a century of the dominion of the mighty Malay sultanate which started with Malacca's founding by Parameswara around 1400.

The invasion also marked the start of Western colonial rule in the country, at that time referred to as the Malay states or Tanah Melayu.

Malacca and, better still, the whole of Malaysia, should officially commemorate the occasion -- not to celebrate defeat but rather to reflect and learn from the past over what had contributed to the total subjugation of a flourishing Malay empire.

In fact, there were many things in the lead-up to the invasion that sounded so eerily familiar with what's going on in Malay or Malaysian politics now.

What was most glaring about the Portuguese conquest in 1511 was that it came as a revenge attack that struck the soft underbelly of Malacca, at a time when the sultan's administration and his people were so vulnerable as they were split.

There were also reports that the Western force, despite being grossly outnumbered, were aided by turncoats and double-crossers from within the local fraternity.

According to history books, the Portuguese armada which attacked Malacca that year consisted of 18 ships and more than 1,000 men led by Alfonso de Albuquerque. Launched from Goa in India, they were out to revenge the attack on a Portuguese naval and trading party two years earlier led by Francisco de Almeida.

That earlier offensive on the foreigners was interestingly instigated by Gujerati and Chinese traders and others doing brisk business in Malacca at that time.

Almeida managed to escape to India in the aftermath, but some of his men were captured as prisoners in Malacca.


J. Kennedy in A History of Malaya said the Malaccans were already politically disunited by the time the second Portuguese wave came and one of the main factors was the split over the choice of Tun Mutahir as bendahara (equivalent to today's menteri besar or prime minister).

"For the Portuguese, it had not been an easy victory," Kennedy wrote. "In manpower, they were greatly outnumbered. The defenders of Malacca used a variety of weapons, from firearms to bows and arrows and poisoned darts.


"Yet, certain advantages lay on the Portuguese side. Their strategy was helped by a description of the Malacca site sent to Albuquerque earlier by one of the Portuguese prisoners through a friendly merchant (the turncoat)."

Kennedy added that many merchants in Malacca at that time just stood by, ready to support whoever that won as long as their properties were not taken away and their interests safeguarded. And this included the Chinese.

"Some merchants, especially the Chinese, had at that time positive grievances against the Malay administration," he wrote.

Sounds familiar? That's because there are traces of the same scheme of things being repeated in the present.

Five hundred years may have passed but the similarities and parallels emerging in situations in the country today is uncanny -- the political squabble over who has the power (the choice of bendahara), the split in the ranks of the common people, the low morale despite outnumbering the enemy and so on.

Then, there were the traitors and turncoats, the business people who were not patriotic at all but only interested in their own private businesses and the Chinese who had "grievances against the Malay administration".

History, as they say, has a funny way of repeating itself. But only if we allow it to. For this reason alone, the momentous 1511 should be remembered and the anniversary duly commemorated.

It is, after all, just about 100 days to 2011.

It is time to reflect.

Hair Management: Myths and Facts

Sheila Chandran wrote this in the online STAR today. I though it was interesting. So, I am pasting in here for our general knowledge.

THE question of the day is: to use or not to use hair conditioners? London-based hair expert Thomas Taw unravels some hair myths and sets the story straight.

Myth: Shampooing is enough to keep hair healthy.
Fact: That is not true. Shampoo only cleanses grime, dirt and oil. Conditioners help nourish hair ends, keeping it smooth and tangle-free.

M: Hair care involves caring for hair roots.
F: Not always. Hair ends need the most attention because it is older and nourishment usually doesn’t reach the tips.

M: Hair oil helps you maintain healthy and beautiful hair.
F: Oiling is great for scalp, but hair ends need special nourishment as it’s rougher. Oiling is not enough to de-tangle hair. Only a conditioner can do that.

M: Conditioners require a lot of time and effort to use.
F: With a good conditioner, you just need to leave it on for a minute or two before rinsing off. Minimal fuss, maximum benefits.

M: Conditioner is only for “troubled hair”.
F: Hair consists of dead proteins and can’t rejuvenate itself. The healthiest hair will eventually dry out if uncared for. Hair needs to be conditioned to prevent dryness and tangles.

M: Conditioners should be applied on the scalp.
F: Conditioners are meant to care for hair ends, not the scalp.

M: Conditioners make hair limp and greasy.
T: Excess oil in scalp causes limp and greasy hair. Conditioners nourish and keep hair strands tangle-free.

M: Conditioners cause dandruff.
F: This is not true. Dandruff is a complex problem and there are many factors that cause it, such as an unhealthy scalp. Dandruff is unrelated to the use of conditioners.

So, do you think you know more about hair management after reading this news-item?

Happy Malaysia Day!


It has been 47 years since Sabah,Sarawak,Singapore came together with Malaya to form Malaysia on 16 September 1963.

Singapore departed to become independent in 1965.

Since then, Malaysia Day was never officially recognised or celebrated.

The people of Sabah and Sarawak were denied their celebrative rights to celebrate their day of independence from the White Rajah. They had to kowtow to to wishes of their brothers in Peninsular Malaysia to celebrate Merdeka Day instead which falls on 31 August yearly.

The new political awareness of what these two states can do to Federal politics have made the powers to be at Putrajaya to provide political space in the country to celebrate Malaysia Day which is truly our day of independence as Malaysia.

Yes, better late than never!

Today we celebrate Hari Malaysia for the first time officially as a country. It is indeed a milestone in the nation's history.

Happy Malaysia Day, everyone!