March 03, 2010

Furniture Business Scenario @2009


Let us looks at some facts and the scenario of furniture manufacturing in 2009.

There are more than 1,800 furniture companies currently operating locally and 90% of the production is for export. Total investment in the industry last year came to RM174.7mil. This information was given yesterday by the International Trade Minister at the Malaysian International Furniture Fair (MIFF) Exhibition 2010, Mustapha Mohamed.

Malaysia-made furniture is exported to more than 160 countries and the country is ranked the world’s 10th largest furniture exporter, while local furniture exports were valued at RM7.6bil last year, accounting for 1.9% of total exports of manufactured goods, according to Mustapa.

MIFF 2010, which began yesterday, will run till Saturday at three venues – the Putra World Tarde Centre, Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre and the Matrade Exhibition & Convention Centre (MECC).MIFF Sdn Bhd is the organiser of the fair with The Star as the official media partner.

More than 500 exhibitors from countries like Malaysia, China, Indonesia, South Korea, Singapore, the United States, Turkey and Japan are showcasing their products.
MIFF managing director Datuk Tan Chin Huat said sales of about US$750mil were expected at this year’s fair, compared with US$710mil last year.

“More than 20,000 visitors are expected at the fair this year, compared with a total of 19,075 visitors last year,” he told a press conference.

He said economic spinoffs of over RM40mil were expected to be generated for Malaysia’s tourism, hotel, restaurant and other businesses during the fair.

In an effort to highlight ongoing trends in the furniture industry, a series of seminars with the theme, “Sustainable Materials for Green Future,” has also been arranged by the organiser.

MRCB: Rights Serendipity

After the annoucement that the rights issue was over-subscribed,this definitely came as a big bomb! A technical under-subscription? How did it occur? Are the MRCB lawyers as well as the Investment Bank that conducted the rights issue offer,'asleep at the wheel'?

Let us read how the imbroglio happened. This is the STAR on-line report on 4 March 2010.

The Employees Provident Fund (EPF) has made a conditional takeover offer to buy all the shares in Malaysian Resources Corp Bhd (MRCB) for RM1.50 each after triggering the takeover threshold.

The exercise could see EPF pay up to RM1.36bil for MRCB if there was full acceptance from other shareholders.

The conditional offer was prompted after EPF was allocated additional shares under MRCB’s RM566mil rights issue that led to the fund’s shareholding in the developer exceed 33% to 33.78%.

The increase in EPF’s shareholding past the 33% threshold obliged the fund to conduct the takeover under the Malaysian Code on Take-Overs and Mergers, 1998.

In a statement to Bursa Malaysia yesterday, MRCB said EPF, however, intended to maintain the listed status of MRCB and would not privatise the company.

OSK Research head Chris Eng said the offer of RM1.50 a share was slightly below the brokerage’s fair value and that the offer itself was not very attractive.

“There is a lot more potential in the company which we have not factored into the fair value of the stock,’’ he said.

MRCB is talked about being a bidder for major tracks of land in the Klang Valley and the money it raised from the rights issue would go towards buying land for future development projects.

Analysts said its track record in developing KL Sentral would act as a good platform for MRCB in making its case in any bids for such land.

Sources said EPF was unable to apply for a waiver from making the takeover from the Securities Commission as it did not fulfill an important criterion, which is the condition of not trading a company’s shares in the past six months.[As such the issuing house Investment Bank should take note of this condition: They should not be buying the targeted shares within the period of 6 months if they attend to apply for a Mandatory General Offer(MGO) waiver.]

Under the Code, EPF would have to offer to shareholders of MRCB the highest price it paid to buy an MRCB share over the past six months, sources said.

The offer for MRCB represents a small 2% premium over the last traded price of the stock of RM1.47. Sources said EPF wanted to make a fair offer but did not intend to give large premiums of around 20% seen in other privatisation deals as it was not the fund’s intention to delist the company from the stock exchange.
“It does not want to take the company private and would like to see future capital appreciation of MRCB,’’ the source said.

Sources also shot down suggestions that the takeover offer was a new strategic direction for the fund where it would prefer direct control of companies.
 
Although EPF controls RHB Capital Bhd and Malaysian Building Society Bhd, it does not want to take MRCB down the same path.

Sources said even if EPF, which also owns large stakes in other developers such as IJM Corp Bhd, dramatically increases its stake in MRCB, it would not make MRCB its vehicle for property ventures.

So which way will the share price go now? It is obvious that the shareholders will not take this offer price of RM1.50 when the current current  price is RM1.46

China: Rural Buying Surge!

This Reuters report shows that rural buying support in spurring the GDP of the Chinese nation.

When Dell Inc reported its fourth-quarter results last month, the announcement included a surprising figure — an 81 percent jump in the PC maker’s China sales during the quarter.

Fueling this result, said the company, were government incentives to spur domestic consumption, particularly in small cities and rural areas.

Dell, which sells its computers in China through retail chains as well as through its direct sales model, is not alone.

Competitors ranging from China’s Suning and GOME to foreign rivals like Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Best Buy are profiting from Beijing’s determination to drive economic growth by boosting spending in the country’s US$1.8 trillion (RM6 trillion)retail market.

The Chinese government announced recently that it will extend its incentives for rural and small-city consumers, setting off what is likely to be a close competition among retailers that have until now focused mainly on China’s big cities.

The opportunity is big. More than two-thirds of China’s 1.3 billion people live in rural areas — roughly three times the entire population of the United States. Retail sales in these areas grew 16 per cent to 4 trillion yuan (RM1.97 trillion) last year.

Investor optimism about China’s stimulus spending has already sent China retail shares soaring. GOME, for one, jumped 180 per cent in 2009, outstripping a 52 per cent rise in the broader  Hong Kong market.
China’s domestic electronics retailers are pursuing their new customers aggressively.

Suning, the country’s largest electronics chain by market value, said it would use the 3 billion yuan it raised from a share sale to expand sales network and to develop logistics centres. It plans to add 520 new stores in 2010 on the existing network of 941 stores across China.

Rival GOME, with over 700 stores across China, has adopted a “go rural” policy, and plans to team with small local retailers to increase the range of products on offer in a bid to tap rural spending growth.

Foreign retailers are also starting to look outside the tier-one cities. Wal-Mart, the world’s biggest retailer, electronics retailer Best Buy and France’s Carrefour are all eyeing growth in second and third-tier cities, if not yet rural areas.

Profits from these ventures won’t be immediate, however.

Suning and GOME probably won’t see their new rural stores break even in fewer than five years, said Natalie Zhu, a senior China retail analyst from JLM Pacific Epoch, a Shanghai- and Beijing-based research firm.

And as they move into China’s hinterlands, domestic and foreign retailers alike will have to confront entrenched local competitors.

“Individual operators now occupy the majority of the (rural) market,” said Zhu. “Even (national) local players have very little market share for the time being, not to mention the foreign operators.”

Independent local players, which account for more than 50 per cent of the rural market, have advantages including being able to use their familiarity with local spending behaviour to adjust their offerings and provide customised product advice to their customers.

“Even domestic players will find it quite difficult to penetrate the true rural areas, because the market, the demand and the customers have very different profiles compared with bigger cities,” said Bei Fu, a director of corporate and infrastructure ratings at Standard & Poor’s.

Consider televisions. Rural consumers tend to prefer big screen TVs, which confer greater status in their villages while urban shoppers are more focused on quality and brand, according to Zhu.

While national operators like Suning and GOME will struggle to compete with local chains, their wide selection of fast-selling electronics products may give them an edge over foreign players such as Wal-Mart and Carrefour.

When asked recently about flat-screen televisions, a salesman in the small electronics department of a newly opened Carrefour in the second-tier factory town of Dongguan suggested the reporter look elsewhere.
“You can probably get a wider choice of products in the Suning just down the street,” he said.

There is another risk in the retailers’ rural expansion plans: if China scales back its incentives, rural spending growth could stall, saddling retailers with a costly and unprofitable network of stores.

For now, though, that seems like a distant worry.

“What does China have the most of? Farmers. The rise of this spending group will drive growth of the retail sector,” said Linus Yip, strategist of First Shanghai Securities.

“Growth is definitely there.”