December 05, 2009

Japan: The JAL Bailout

You could never imagine it happening. First JAL went under a heap of debts. Then the Japanese government bailed it out. When the world condemned Malaysia for bailing out some of its failed enterprises, there was uproar in the world. Look how times have changed. Today, even the West is doing that from Washington DC to London.

So what's new? Japan is just another player playing the same game.

So, the news has it today (6 December 2009) that the Japanese government plans to guarantee about 700 billion yen (RM27.3 billion) in loans and other funds provided by financial institutions to keep Japan Airlines afloat.

The plan will be funded through an extra budget for the current fiscal year to next March, which is expected to be compiled this week, Nikkei said today without citing sources.

The plan is aimed at keeping JAL from having to suspend scheduled flights due to a shortage of operating funds, Nikkei said.

Debt-laden JAL has warned it faces bankruptcy unless it undergoes a major restructuring to cut costs, and is seeking a capital injection from a state-backed fund on top of any capital from American Airlines or Delta Air Lines.

Nikkei said the loan-guarantee scheme will cover possible investments from financial institutions in the airline, and the support measure will enable them to provide necessary funding for JAL on short notice.

Standard & Poor's cut JAL's corporate credit rating to a "selective default" on Wednesday, citing a pact with creditors to freeze some loan payments under a mediated debt restructuring called Alternative Dispute Resolution.

The suspension of those debt payments has been agreed to by JAL's major creditors, giving it some breathing room while the state-backed Enterprise Initiative Turnaround Corp deliberates on whether to inject it with public funds.

The ETIC is expected to make a decision in January.

So if the world's second largest economy has to play the bailout game, is this becoming a global norm to salvage failed and inefficient enterprises? You tell me!

No comments: