I was quite prepared for the examination in terms of the substance of the Commissioner for Oath Regulations,1993 were concerned. However, what stumped me was the entire examination was subjective unlike previous years where some or all were in objective form. To make matters worse, I was careless with time management.
There were 20 questions to be done in 90 minutes. Apart from missing a whole lot of questions because of confusion arising from poor time management, I could not answer obvious questions or could use clues to my advantage. Moreover, my disappointment with the stress of 'authority' meaning to remember the regulations by number also spooked me to a certain extent of disorienting me.
Anyway, I said my prayers before the exam but evil influence got in the way. Called it Murphy's law or whatever, I have not really felt disappointment or daunting challenges for quite a while. This was the wake-up call. For one thing, my memory is slowly slipping away. That I know for sure.......
5 comments:
hello..
i'm one of the candidate that took the exam on the 18th may 2011..
quite suprised with the exam..thought that it will be in the form of objective question..
luckily i managed to answer all the question..but the time given is very short..
wish u all the best..still waiting for the result
Well, I do hope you will pass and go for the interview.
I am just keeping my fingers crossed. If the response is negative, I may decide to go and work in a law firm. Will likely specialise in living trusts.
thanks, hopefully so..do you have any idea on how the interview will be conducted?
where to apply to sit for exam?
any info where to apply to sit for the exam. i tried going to putrajaya but to no avail
Post a Comment