You will be given your chance to fight big business come the next GenM EGM to reject or endorse the UK casino buy-out from GenS soon. Do not squander this one-in-a -billion chance!
Tell Kok Thay and his comatose BOD that enough is enough! Reject the deal! Save your coffer!
Let us read this report from the Malaysian Business Times.
"Minority shareholders may stymie Genting Malaysia Bhd's plan to buy Genting Singapore plc's casino business in the UK for £340 million (RM1.66 billion), analysts said yesterday.
This is the second largest related party transaction (RPT) involving the Genting group in a decade, following subscription of US$442 million (RM1.42 billion) Star Cruises shares, the 10 per cent purchase of Walker Digital Gaming for US$69 million (RM222 million) and the acquisition of Wisma Genting and Segambut property for RM284.1 million.
Genting Singapore is the biggest gaming operator in the UK with 44 venues under the Circus, Maxims and Mint brands.
"The purchase is a bit pricey, and delinquent shareholders are bound to raise the matter at the forthcoming EGM (extraordinary general meeting)," Affin Securities gaming analyst Chong Len Len told Business Times.
Genting, the country's sole casino operator, told the stock exchange on Thursday it will soon hold a special meeting to seek shareholders' support for the plan.
Since it is an RPT for Genting, Kien Huat Realty Sdn Bhd and Parkview Management Sdn Bhd, which collectively own 48.67 per cent of Genting, will not be able to vote at the meeting.
Likewise, Genting's chairman Tan Sri Lim Kok Thay, who is also the executive chairman and shareholder of Genting Singapore, will not be able to vote.
A slew of foreign funds such as Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund, the Government of Singapore Investment Corp and Comgest Growth Emerging Markets own small chunks of Genting.
News of the planned purchase brought downgrades from research firms such as HwangDBS Vickers, OSK Research and Deutsche Bank. This took its toll on Genting shares yesterday.
The stock fell 12 sen to RM2.62 sen a share on heavy volume, just 11 sen higher than its lowest closing price in 52 trading weeks.
Elsewhere, Samuel Yin Shao Yang, a senior associate at ECM Libra, described the deal as value-destroying without accreting earnings.
"The fact that more than a quarter of Genting's net cash will be spent on an RPT, which is barely earnings accretive, does not sit easy with us," Yin wrote in the report. He recommended that investors sell the stock.
He reasoned that the Genting Group's rationale that only Genting Malaysia within the group has the financial muscle does not hold water.
"We beg to differ because as at December 31 2009, Genting Singapore's cash balance stood at S$2.8 billion (RM6.4 billion) and its net gearing was comfortable at 24 per cent," wrote Yin in the report.
He estimates that if Genting did not buy the casino assets from its sister company, the Malaysian outlet will have a cash war chest of RM6 billion by the year-end."
So say your piece at the EGM or forever hold your peace and suck on your thumbs!
July 02, 2010
GenM: Rumble Tumble
So, when it stung, it stank!
Shares of Genting Malaysia Bhd fell as much as 10 per cent today [2 July 2010] over concerns that its proposed acquisition of casino operations in the UK from its Singapore affiliate was too risky.
Genting shares dropped 28 sen, the most in nine years, to hit a low of RM2.46 before recovering to RM2.62 as at 12.15pm.
OSK Research has also cut its fair value for Genting shares from RM3.15 to RM2.55 and downgraded the stock from “Buy” to “Sell”.
Malaysia's sole casino operator had proposed to acquire the casino operations in UK (Genting UK) from its affiliate company Genting Singapore Plc for about RM1.7 billion. It had also separately proposed to develop a video lottery facility at the Aqueduct “racino” which combines racing with casinos.
OSK Research said in a report today that it felt the acquisition and development cost was not compensated by meaningful earnings growth prospects. It also said that there was inherent risk of future “value destructive related party transactions” and as a consequence is attaching no value to the group’s net cash balance.
“We view these developments negatively as the relatively high acquisition and development cost is not compensated by meaningful earnings accretion to the group despite Genting UK casinos’ long established operating track record,” said OSK Research.
It said that it was “cautious” on the medium-term viability of the US racino project pending more details on the development expenditure of the Genting bid.
It also noted that the winning bidder has to pay an upfront US$300 million (RM971 million) in non-refundable payment, which could be deemed a licensing fee.
“As such, we think that the cost of development could easily exceed RM1 billion,” said OSK.
Genting said in a statement yesterday that the proposed acquisition of Genting UK complemented its long-term international expansion plans.
The acquisition however will have to be approved by Bank Negara and the British Gambling Commission.
Shares of Genting Malaysia Bhd fell as much as 10 per cent today [2 July 2010] over concerns that its proposed acquisition of casino operations in the UK from its Singapore affiliate was too risky.
Genting shares dropped 28 sen, the most in nine years, to hit a low of RM2.46 before recovering to RM2.62 as at 12.15pm.
OSK Research has also cut its fair value for Genting shares from RM3.15 to RM2.55 and downgraded the stock from “Buy” to “Sell”.
Malaysia's sole casino operator had proposed to acquire the casino operations in UK (Genting UK) from its affiliate company Genting Singapore Plc for about RM1.7 billion. It had also separately proposed to develop a video lottery facility at the Aqueduct “racino” which combines racing with casinos.
OSK Research said in a report today that it felt the acquisition and development cost was not compensated by meaningful earnings growth prospects. It also said that there was inherent risk of future “value destructive related party transactions” and as a consequence is attaching no value to the group’s net cash balance.
“We view these developments negatively as the relatively high acquisition and development cost is not compensated by meaningful earnings accretion to the group despite Genting UK casinos’ long established operating track record,” said OSK Research.
It said that it was “cautious” on the medium-term viability of the US racino project pending more details on the development expenditure of the Genting bid.
It also noted that the winning bidder has to pay an upfront US$300 million (RM971 million) in non-refundable payment, which could be deemed a licensing fee.
“As such, we think that the cost of development could easily exceed RM1 billion,” said OSK.
Genting said in a statement yesterday that the proposed acquisition of Genting UK complemented its long-term international expansion plans.
The acquisition however will have to be approved by Bank Negara and the British Gambling Commission.
Labels:
Stocks
July 01, 2010
Genting Berhad: Making Sophie's Choice
Yes, how sad can it be!
Sophie had little choice.She had to sacrifice one child to the Nazi gas chamber.
But not Genting Berhad!!
First it nonchalantly sacrificed the GenM minority shareholders' billion RM hoard to a transfer payment of buying some buildings from itself. This is somewhat tolerable and grudgingly accepted by minority shareholders as assets are gained on the balance sheet.
Now this, the hiving of GenS's loss making ventures in UK to the poor minority shareholders of GenM again!! Kok Thay-what happened?.
Isn't this culling of the diminishing cash horde that could be used to reward the loyalty of the GenM shareholders?
Aren't the minority shareholders being culled too?
We do not know the real reason behind this left hand to right hand move. To the laymen, it is a dead loss as we have to carry these dead ducks in UK.
Unless GenBhd can provide a positive basis for thsi move, I think minority shareholders should question Kok Thay for his bird-brain scheme against GenM minority shareholders.
The stock took another meeting to fall more than 30 sen at one point. It lost 12 sen at the noon close today.(2 July 2010)
Sophie had little choice.She had to sacrifice one child to the Nazi gas chamber.
But not Genting Berhad!!
First it nonchalantly sacrificed the GenM minority shareholders' billion RM hoard to a transfer payment of buying some buildings from itself. This is somewhat tolerable and grudgingly accepted by minority shareholders as assets are gained on the balance sheet.
Now this, the hiving of GenS's loss making ventures in UK to the poor minority shareholders of GenM again!! Kok Thay-what happened?.
Isn't this culling of the diminishing cash horde that could be used to reward the loyalty of the GenM shareholders?
Aren't the minority shareholders being culled too?
We do not know the real reason behind this left hand to right hand move. To the laymen, it is a dead loss as we have to carry these dead ducks in UK.
Unless GenBhd can provide a positive basis for thsi move, I think minority shareholders should question Kok Thay for his bird-brain scheme against GenM minority shareholders.
The stock took another meeting to fall more than 30 sen at one point. It lost 12 sen at the noon close today.(2 July 2010)
Labels:
Stocks
June 30, 2010
Mulpha to raise RM21m
Mulpha International (Mulpha), an old horse of the Bursa, expects the listing of its subsidiary, Manta Holdings Co Ltd (MHCL), on the main board of Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Ltd in July to raise HK$50mil (RM21.2mil)
.
CEO Chung Tze Hien said the funds raised would help MHCL expand its crane business.
“The listing status allows the MHCL group to have greater financial flexibility when pursuing its growth plans,” he told reporters after Mulpha International’s AGM and EGM yesterday.
There are four companies under the MHCL group - Manta Engineering and Equipment Co Ltd, Manta Equipment Rental Co Ltd, Manta Equipment Services Ltd and Manta Equipment (S) Pte Ltd.
The companies all serve the crane business, from sale and leasing to servicing of crane-related construction equipment.
Chung said proceeds from the listing exercise would be used to purchase tower cranes and construction equipment for rental purposes, general working capital, expansion and improvement of storage facilities, service and maintenance workshops.
He said there was continued strong demand for cranes, especially from the Hong Kong, China and Singapore construction sectors.
Currently, Mulpha International owns 88% of MHCL, while the balance is held by Pan Ocean International.
“Upon MHCL being listed, the 12% held by Pan Ocean would be acquired by Mulpha International,” Chung said.
On the impact of MHCL’s expansion plans on Mulpha International, he said MHCL’s current earnings contribution to the group was not substantial. “But, with MHCL’s planned business expansion going forward, the contributions to the group could be more significant.”
As part of the proposed listing, Mulpha International will undertake an internal restructuring and re-organisation exercise following which it would issue 50 million new MHCL shares, representing 25% of the enlarged issued and paid-up share capital of the company.
The new shares would comprise five million issue shares that would be made to the Hong Kong public and 45 million shares to professional, institutional and other investors.
None of the directors of Mulpha International and MHCL group would be offered shares in MHCL pursuant to the proposed listing.
Chung said the group was confident its financial performance would be better this year.
On the reason for Mulpha Land Bhd’s par value reduction exercise, Chung said it would place the company in a better position to raise capital.
“The exercise allows us to raise capital when conditions are more favourable. There is a misperception that a par value reduction exercise is negative. In fact, there is now a trend for companies in the developed world to have a low par value or not at all,” he said.
Mulpha Land lowered its par value from RM1 to 10 sen.
“A lower par value will make it easier for Mulpha Land to go to the market to raise funds. It is also not possible to raise new shares at below par value,” he noted, adding that the exercise would not result in any adjustment to the share price of Mulpha Land or the number of shares held by shareholders.
He said the exercise would give rise to a credit of RM82.19mil which would be offset against Mulpha Land’s accumulated losses, and the balance credited to its capital reserves.
Mulpha International has a 55.56% stake in Mulpha Land.
.
CEO Chung Tze Hien said the funds raised would help MHCL expand its crane business.
“The listing status allows the MHCL group to have greater financial flexibility when pursuing its growth plans,” he told reporters after Mulpha International’s AGM and EGM yesterday.
There are four companies under the MHCL group - Manta Engineering and Equipment Co Ltd, Manta Equipment Rental Co Ltd, Manta Equipment Services Ltd and Manta Equipment (S) Pte Ltd.
Period | High | Low |
Prices 1 Month | 0.430 (17 June) | 0.390 (17 June) |
Prices 3 Months | 0.525 (30-Apr-10) | 0.390 (17-Jun-10) |
Prices 12 Months | 0.585 (14-Aug-09) | 0.390 (17-Jun-10) |
Volume 12 Months | 282,099 (28-Jan-10) | 2,375 (24-Dec-09) |
The companies all serve the crane business, from sale and leasing to servicing of crane-related construction equipment.
Chung said proceeds from the listing exercise would be used to purchase tower cranes and construction equipment for rental purposes, general working capital, expansion and improvement of storage facilities, service and maintenance workshops.
He said there was continued strong demand for cranes, especially from the Hong Kong, China and Singapore construction sectors.
Currently, Mulpha International owns 88% of MHCL, while the balance is held by Pan Ocean International.
“Upon MHCL being listed, the 12% held by Pan Ocean would be acquired by Mulpha International,” Chung said.
On the impact of MHCL’s expansion plans on Mulpha International, he said MHCL’s current earnings contribution to the group was not substantial. “But, with MHCL’s planned business expansion going forward, the contributions to the group could be more significant.”
As part of the proposed listing, Mulpha International will undertake an internal restructuring and re-organisation exercise following which it would issue 50 million new MHCL shares, representing 25% of the enlarged issued and paid-up share capital of the company.
The new shares would comprise five million issue shares that would be made to the Hong Kong public and 45 million shares to professional, institutional and other investors.
None of the directors of Mulpha International and MHCL group would be offered shares in MHCL pursuant to the proposed listing.
Chung said the group was confident its financial performance would be better this year.
On the reason for Mulpha Land Bhd’s par value reduction exercise, Chung said it would place the company in a better position to raise capital.
“The exercise allows us to raise capital when conditions are more favourable. There is a misperception that a par value reduction exercise is negative. In fact, there is now a trend for companies in the developed world to have a low par value or not at all,” he said.
Mulpha Land lowered its par value from RM1 to 10 sen.
“A lower par value will make it easier for Mulpha Land to go to the market to raise funds. It is also not possible to raise new shares at below par value,” he noted, adding that the exercise would not result in any adjustment to the share price of Mulpha Land or the number of shares held by shareholders.
He said the exercise would give rise to a credit of RM82.19mil which would be offset against Mulpha Land’s accumulated losses, and the balance credited to its capital reserves.
Mulpha International has a 55.56% stake in Mulpha Land.
Labels:
Stocks
June 27, 2010
Malaysia’s Global Sukuk Success
THE announcement to launch a global sukuk on May 19 was greeted with a lot of questions, doubts and scepticism. This was due to uncertainties caused by the sovereign debt crisis, particularly in Greece, Spain, Portugal and Ireland, which accentuated concerns over a double-dip recession.
Notwithstanding this, we went ahead with the launch after taking into consideration the factors in favour of Malaysia. These include the strong demand for good quality sovereign debt papers in the market; Malaysia’s credit risk spreads, which had narrowed considerably; the country’s good credit story supported by sound economic fundamentals; and clear economic transformation agenda under the New Economic Model.
It was a calculated and bold move. We were proven right when the issue was oversubscribed by nearly six times the initial size of US$1bil (RM3.25bil).
The issue was a huge success with a final sukuk size of US$1.25bil (RM4.06bil). It was Malaysia’s first in the international debt market after a lapse of eight years and was accorded emas, a special recognition given to foreign currency denominated issues in the Malaysian capital market.
The global sukuk has three objectives: to establish a new US dollar benchmark as pricing guidance for corporate fund raising, to profile Malaysia’s credit story in international capital markets, and to showcase the country as a global Islamic financial hub. The issue successfully met these objectives.
In line with Malaysia’s leadership in Islamic finance, the issue was structured as a syariah-based Ijara − an asset-based Islamic instrument, which pays sukuk-holders returns from the rental of 12 government-run hospitals.
The purchase price is equivalent to the proceeds raised by the special purpose vehicle – 1Malaysia Global Sukuk Sdn Bhd (the trustee/issuer).
It is a sale and lease-back arrangement, where the Federal Land Commissioner as the land owner of the 12 hospitals would sell the asset to the trustee which will lease the assets to the Government. Rentals received will be used to make periodic payments to sukuk investors.
Upon maturity, sukuk holders will be paid the redemption sum through the proceeds received from the Government as the obligor who will purchase the rights, interest, benefits and entitlements on the lease assets from the Trustee.
The sukuk was assigned a rating of A- by Standard and Poor’s and A3 by Moody’s. The credit ratings reflect Malaysia’s sovereign credit worthiness backed by a deep and liquid domestic capital market, a well-managed and resilient financial system, strong external position, net external creditor position as well as a diverse and competitive economy.
The global sukuk roadshows started off with a team lead by Second Finance Minister, who met investors in Jeddah, Riyadh, Abu Dhabi and Dubai. The second team led by the Finance Ministry secretary-general saw investors in Hong Kong, Singapore, London and finally in New York, where the sukuk size and pricing were finalised.
During the roadshows, the teams met investors in groups and also had one-on-one interactions with key investors. Investors raised questions on Malaysia’s fiscal sustainability, economic fundamentals as well as the reform agenda of the Government. The teams took the opportunity to explain Malaysia’s economic policies, the accommodative monetary policy as well as impressed upon the investors the reform agenda and growth prospects that will be realised through the New Economic Model.
Fundamentals intact
Investors were convinced that Malaysia’s fundamentals remained intact, with strong fiscal position and credible economic growth from enhanced reform initiatives under the New Economic Model.
These meetings were well-received and generated significant interest among investors in Asia, the Middle East, Europe and the United States, despite increased uncertainty and market volatility created by the debt crisis in Greece.
The high-level delegations were instrumental in raising Malaysia’s profile and entrenching its growth prospects among key investors and decision-makers.
As a result, the issue attracted bids from a diverse group of over 270 investors around the world with most bids from Asia and the Middle East.
The final distribution reflected the wide interest among global institutional investors for Malaysia’s debt papers.
It also reinforced Malaysia’s lead position in the global sukuk market, accounting for 65% of global outstanding sukuk.
The initial proposed size of the global sukuk was US$1bil, which was upsized to US$1.25bil after receiving bids of about six times over the initial cover, making it the largest global sovereign sukuk ever.
The five–year sukuk was priced on May 27 to yield 3.928%, the lowest yield for an Asian sovereign issue in the last five years.
In New York, where the pricing was to be decided, the global markets had turned volatile threatening to scuttle the whole exercise. However, with a strong order-book from Asia and the Middle East, a small window of opportunity appeared when the market stabilised.
Bold and quick decisions were made to capitalise on it. The price “whisper” began at around the Treasury+200 basis points range and the order-book started to fill up and demand momentum was sustained.
With such an encouraging order-book, the pricing guidance was issued at Treasury+190 basis points and finally the issue was priced to yield 3.928%.
The final pricing at Treasury+180 basis points was very competitive, given the uncertainty and volatility of markets caused by the ongoing Greek debt crisis.
The spread on the five-year sukuk due in June 2015 further narrowed by six basis points a day after listing, reflecting robust demand for Malaysia’s dollar debt.
It was challenging to launch and conclude the largest sovereign sukuk ever at the lowest price for an Asian sovereign issue in the last five years. Despite the volatile markets, there was overwhelming response to the global sukuk, reflecting investor confidence in Malaysia’s credit story and growth prospects.
We must sustain this confidence by implementing all reform measures, however painful it may be in the short term. We must sacrifice for the greater good of the nation in the long run.
The success of the global emas sukuk is indeed an international recognition and endorsement of Malaysia’s credit story and confidence in the reform agenda of the New Economic Model under the leadership of Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak.
“Our sukuk offering was priced at the lowest yield achieved by an Asian sovereign in the past five years notwithstanding volatile market conditions. We also had wider investors base from Asia, the Middle East, Europe and the US. This is a great achievement for Malaysia.”
Labels:
Perspectives
Intra Corporate Buy-in of Sports Toto Shares
So why is this happening?
Was it in the light that they believed that Ascot will get the Sports betting licence?
The licence is gone for now...........
If so, will this purchase continue?
So far this is the status of purchase.
BCorp and its unlisted indirect subsidiaries, Inter-Pacific Capital Sdn Bhd (IPC), Inter-Pacific Securities Sdn Bhd (IPS) and Bizurai Bijak (M) Sdn Bhd have bought 56.74 million of 10 sen shares in Berjaya Sports Toto Bhd (BToto) from the open market.
The companies bought the shares, which represent 4.24 per cent equity in BToto between June 25 2009 and June 24 2010, for RM247.93 million or at an average acquisition price of RM4.37 per share.
"The acquisitions have enabled the BCorp group to step up its interest in BToto via purchases in the open market, in a gaming company with good financial performance and dividend track record which provides lucrative yield to investors," the company told Bursa Malaysia yesterday.
Labels:
Stocks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







