This Reuters report highlights the concerns of the British banking system.
Let us read it.
"British banks warn that upcoming banking regulation could shave two percentage points off the country’s economic growth," said Sky News today, citing an unpublished report by PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
Forcing banks to keep more capital on their balance sheets would stymie bank lending and prevent credit flowing into the economy, the report quoted Sky.
In a statement, the British Bankers’ Association confirmed PwC was carrying out an analysis on behalf of the banks on the economic effects of capital, liquidity and other proposals being considered for the industry.
“The analysis is yet to be completed but we will at all times be discussing with the various authorities the issues that arise from the study,” BBA said.
Sky said the report looked at measures being proposed by the financial regulator, the Financial Services Authority, and at the international level, but did not include the bank taxes recently proposed by the International Monetary Fund.
The broadcaster said the banks — including Barclays, HSBC and the Royal Bank of Scotland — and the BBA had wanted to delay publication until after the UK’s May 6 general election.
On the campaign trail, Prime Minister Gordon Brown told reporters: “We have got to reform the banks, the banks have got to serve the public.
“The recapitalisation of the banks and a proper system of remuneration and dealing with liquidity ratios is absolutely crucial to the future of British industry and the future of everybody who is a homeowner in this country.”
Barclays earlier on Friday followed other banks in reporting a fall in bad debts as Britain and other economies pulled out of recession.
In a statement at the bank’s AGM, Chairman Marcus Agius told shareholders: “We fully recognise that changes to regulation need to be made.
“But there are important and difficult trade-offs to be made between improving the stability of the financial system, reducing the risk of a recurrence of a financial crisis and stimulating and supporting economic growth.”
April 30, 2010
Greece: A Silver Lining for Bursa?
After reading the possibility of Malaysia becoming another Greece in the former posting, it is with relief that we read that our stock market can indeed benefit from this Grecian fall-out.
Let us read this report from Bloomberg.
"Malaysia, which is seen as a defensive market, could benefit if concerns over the Greek fiscal crisis continues.
Asian stocks ex-Japan could fall as much 17 per cent due to the Greek fiscal crisis according to a BNP Paribas report.
The bank said that US$6 billion (RM19.1 billion) may be withdrawn from funds investing in Asian shares next month, wiping out most of the estimated US$7 billion of inflows this year and recommended that investors buy Malaysian shares. [So who would be losing out? Possibly China.]
“If regional markets are weak, investors might look toward more defensive markets,” said Hwang-DBS Group senior analyst Wong Ming Teck.
OSK Research head of research Chris Eng said however that the Greek crisis will blow over quite quickly and the Asian markets will take the cue from the US.
“Malaysia is always a defensive market and a safe market to go into generally,” he said.
Most Asian equity markets closed higher yesterday due to upbeat earnings reports on Wall Street and expectations that a bailout for Greece would be ready soon.
So let us see whether the oracle readers are right.
Let us read this report from Bloomberg.
"Malaysia, which is seen as a defensive market, could benefit if concerns over the Greek fiscal crisis continues.
Asian stocks ex-Japan could fall as much 17 per cent due to the Greek fiscal crisis according to a BNP Paribas report.
The bank said that US$6 billion (RM19.1 billion) may be withdrawn from funds investing in Asian shares next month, wiping out most of the estimated US$7 billion of inflows this year and recommended that investors buy Malaysian shares. [So who would be losing out? Possibly China.]
“If regional markets are weak, investors might look toward more defensive markets,” said Hwang-DBS Group senior analyst Wong Ming Teck.
OSK Research head of research Chris Eng said however that the Greek crisis will blow over quite quickly and the Asian markets will take the cue from the US.
“Malaysia is always a defensive market and a safe market to go into generally,” he said.
Most Asian equity markets closed higher yesterday due to upbeat earnings reports on Wall Street and expectations that a bailout for Greece would be ready soon.
So let us see whether the oracle readers are right.
Labels:
Perspectives
Malaysia: Another Greece?
This is indeed a Mayday Call.
This is the postulation of Prof Danny Quah of the LSE.
He opines that Malaysia could find itself in the same fiscal mess currently facing several European countries such as Greece if planned economic reforms are not undertaken.
So what gave us away?
Let us look at what is happening in the Eurozone these last few weeks.
"Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain, the so-called PIGS, are under international scrutiny and have roiled global markets due to their level of national debt. Greece, whose government bonds were downgraded to junk status this week, has a debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio of about 115 per cent which could hit 150 per cent by 2012.
Quah, who is also a member of the National Economic Advisory Council (NEAC), said that while Malaysia’s debt to GDP ratio is below that of the PIGS, it isn’t far off either.[He is sounding warning bells!]
“It won’t be too long before we push into PIGS type territory,” said the Prof at a dinner lecture organised by LSE alumni last night where he spoke in his capacity as an LSE economist.
He said that Malaysia needs to take out its stimulus spending, implement the New Economic Model (NEM) reforms and ensure that growth takes place in order to stabilise the nation’s debt to GDP ratio.
Quah also cautioned that Malaysia is expected to become a net oil importer by 2014 and that the country is one of the most sensitive to oil price volatility.[We will be in trouble now that we have supposedly lost RM320 billion to Brunei. Wonder whether there is any truth in this?]
He added however that “it is not all doom and gloom” as Malaysia’s financial sector is relatively robust and Malaysia’s debt consists largely of medium and long term instruments. [Saving grace,at last!]
He said the NEAC, which drafted the NEM, is studying the possibility of reducing corporate and income tax by one per cent per year for several years in tandem with tightening public finances via measures such as the goods and services tax (GST).
The council is also studying a proposal of a “1 Malaysia Supply Chain” to make business promotion efforts more integrated and streamlined.[We have talked about this close to 30 years or more)
Asked by the audience if he thinks the government has the political will to see through economic reforms, Quah replied that while he acknowledged widespread scepticism, his reading of the situation is that the government is serious as it has continued to stress the importance of change. [PM needs to balance off political pressure for level-headed action!]
“I have been impressed over and over again that the leadership doesn’t want to take the easy way out,” said Quah. “I feel even more optimistic, energised and enthusiastic and that we (the NEAC) are not wasting our time. We’re not paid anything at all. Some of us fly halfway around the world.” [Junkets?]"
After having read this article, I think the Prof may possibly be an unintended alarmist.
This is the postulation of Prof Danny Quah of the LSE.
He opines that Malaysia could find itself in the same fiscal mess currently facing several European countries such as Greece if planned economic reforms are not undertaken.
So what gave us away?
Let us look at what is happening in the Eurozone these last few weeks.
"Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain, the so-called PIGS, are under international scrutiny and have roiled global markets due to their level of national debt. Greece, whose government bonds were downgraded to junk status this week, has a debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio of about 115 per cent which could hit 150 per cent by 2012.
Quah, who is also a member of the National Economic Advisory Council (NEAC), said that while Malaysia’s debt to GDP ratio is below that of the PIGS, it isn’t far off either.[He is sounding warning bells!]
“It won’t be too long before we push into PIGS type territory,” said the Prof at a dinner lecture organised by LSE alumni last night where he spoke in his capacity as an LSE economist.
He said that Malaysia needs to take out its stimulus spending, implement the New Economic Model (NEM) reforms and ensure that growth takes place in order to stabilise the nation’s debt to GDP ratio.
Quah also cautioned that Malaysia is expected to become a net oil importer by 2014 and that the country is one of the most sensitive to oil price volatility.[We will be in trouble now that we have supposedly lost RM320 billion to Brunei. Wonder whether there is any truth in this?]
He added however that “it is not all doom and gloom” as Malaysia’s financial sector is relatively robust and Malaysia’s debt consists largely of medium and long term instruments. [Saving grace,at last!]
He said the NEAC, which drafted the NEM, is studying the possibility of reducing corporate and income tax by one per cent per year for several years in tandem with tightening public finances via measures such as the goods and services tax (GST).
The council is also studying a proposal of a “1 Malaysia Supply Chain” to make business promotion efforts more integrated and streamlined.[We have talked about this close to 30 years or more)
Asked by the audience if he thinks the government has the political will to see through economic reforms, Quah replied that while he acknowledged widespread scepticism, his reading of the situation is that the government is serious as it has continued to stress the importance of change. [PM needs to balance off political pressure for level-headed action!]
“I have been impressed over and over again that the leadership doesn’t want to take the easy way out,” said Quah. “I feel even more optimistic, energised and enthusiastic and that we (the NEAC) are not wasting our time. We’re not paid anything at all. Some of us fly halfway around the world.” [Junkets?]"
After having read this article, I think the Prof may possibly be an unintended alarmist.
Labels:
Perspectives
Genting: Now It Has Gone into Banking
So listen here. What do you know?
Genting has now put its money into banking as well. It is with many parties moving slowly into a Sri Lanka ban called the Union Bank of Colombo (UBC).
Let us read excerpts of this news article.
Managed by a high-powered Board of Directors and Management Team, UBC has received commitments for an additional equity capital of Rs. 2 billion and is set to join hands with several new foreign investors in achieving its objective of becoming one of Sri Lanka's topmost financial services organisations.
In a significant move, Genting Berhad, the Malaysian conglomerate engaged in leisure and hospitality, and USA based fund Shorecap would be strategic investors in Union Bank.
Mr. Ajita de Zoysa, Chairman of Union Bank said, "This investment demonstrates the solidity and strength of Union Bank. Genting Group is Malaysia's leading Multinational Corporation and one of Asia's best-managed companies."
"A significant factor enabling Union Bank to raise new capital is the safe and viable environment for investment created by the progressive financial and economic policies being adopted by the Government. With the end of the conflict and the prevailing peaceful conditions, Sri Lanka's sound financial markets, rapid economic development programmes and the immense resource base, will attract new investors globally, thus enabling Sri Lankan corporations to make rapid progress. Sri Lanka today is being regarded as a favourable investment destination."
Mr. Ajita de Zoysa added, "In progressing towards further growth, the Union Bank developed a five year Strategic Plan in consultation with an International Organisation. The objective of the equity raising is to fund the expansion envisaged under the plan and to meet the Central Bank's Minimum Capital Requirement."
Mr. Ajita de Zoysa had a special word of praise for the Central Bank officials for the efficiency and guidance demonstrated during the approval process.
Speaking on the Bank's performance Mr. Nilanth De Silva, Acting Chief Executive Officer of Union Bank stated that that Bank aims to build on the extensive re-organisation carried out in the last few years.
He stated, "Union Bank achieved new heights in 2009, recording an impressive growth after posting a profitability of Rs. 62.1 million. The profitability recorded in the previous year was Rs. 23.1 million. The Bank's deposit base grew from Rs. 10.4 billion to Rs 12 billion, while the Bank's asset base saw upward movement from Rs. 12.5 billion to Rs. 14.1 billion."
Mr. Anil Amarasuriya, Consultant/Director stated, "Part of the strategic plan is to reach out to a wider customer base, hence, the Bank aims to open several new branches this year. The Bank has already opened new branches in the North and plans to expand to other parts of the Island."
Mr. Amarasuriya added, "In order to achieve shareholders' aspiration in terms of growth and profitability, the Bank will expand organically and through acquisition. The end game is to elevate Union Bank to be a financial services powerhouse. The Bank is also working towards an Initial Public Offering (IPO).
"The Bank is led by an experienced Board of Directors comprising entrepreneurs, experts from banking, financial and management fields and industry leaders, who, have provided leadership and vision in taking the bank towards its goals. The entry of the new investors will give added impetus," he noted.
So,do you think it is a good move by Genting?
Sounds promising. Time will tell.
Labels:
Stocks
April 29, 2010
USA: Slow but Sustainable Growth in 1st Q
This Reuters Report dated 30 April is quite re-assuring as we await confirmation. Read on.
"US economic growth probably slowed in the first quarter, data is expected to show today, but resurgent consumer spending should offer evidence of a sustainable recovery.
The economy expanded at a 3.4 per cent annual rate in the first three months of the year, economists polled by Reuters believe. That would mark a slowdown from the 5.6 per cent pace logged in the fourth quarter when the economy got a big lift as businesses curbed efforts to cut inventories.
The advance report on US gross domestic product from the Commerce Department due at 8.30am (1230 GMT) should mark three straight quarters of growth as the economy digs out of its worst recession since the Great Depression.
GDP measures total goods and services output within US borders.
Though the economy took a step back from its brisk pace in late 2009, today’s report should show areas such as consumer and business spending proved more robust in the first quarter, analysts said.
The bulk of the growth in the fourth quarter came as businesses met more demand with new production and less by selling off goods sitting on the shelf.
Inventories are expected to play a lesser role in the first quarter, when consumers are seen taking up the baton.
“The key thing for sustaining and growing the US economy is consumer spending. Everything we know about the first quarter is looking very strong in that area,” said Kurt Karl, head of economic research at Swiss Re in New York.
Data that has already come in on consumer spending has been robust. Analysts expect consumer spending during the quarter grew at a rate anywhere between 3.2 per cent and 4 per cent.
Consumer spending, which normally accounts for about 70 per cent of US economic activity, grew only at a 1.6 per cent pace in the fourth quarter.
There have been worries the US recovery, which has been led by the manufacturing sector as businesses begin to rebuild inventories, could sputter if consumers did not come on board. These concerns are beginning to take a back seat.
“There is growing evidence of a handoff from stimulus and inventory-driven growth to broader sources of demand, although we still look for overall moderate growth,” said Julia Coronado, an economist at BNP Paribas in New York.
The US Federal Reserve on Wednesday noted economic activity had continued to strengthen in recent week and the labor market was starting to improve.
However, saying it still expects a modest recovery, it left benchmark overnight lending rates near zero and renewed its vow to keep them low for an extended period.
While inventories will still contribute to first quarter growth, it will be far less than the 3.8 per centage points of US growth it accounted for in the fourth quarter.
Excluding inventories, the economy is expected to have expanded at a 2.1 per cent rate, up from 1.7 per cent in the fourth quarter.
Boding well for the recovery is business spending on software and equipment, which is expected to have continued its upward trend in the January-March period.
“If they are spending on equipment already, it shows a lot of confidence for the future hiring which supports consumer spending. If we continue to have employment growth, we will have a good year,” said Swiss Re’s Karl.
Last month the economy enjoyed the strongest jobs growth in three years as private employers stepped up hiring.
Investment in new homes, which showed some hesitancy early this month, is expected to be a drag on growth in the first quarter — after two quarters of gains. Spending on structures likely subtracted from GDP for a seventh straight quarter.
With some of the rise in domestic demand being met through imports, a wider trade deficit will chip at growth in the first quarter."
"US economic growth probably slowed in the first quarter, data is expected to show today, but resurgent consumer spending should offer evidence of a sustainable recovery.
The economy expanded at a 3.4 per cent annual rate in the first three months of the year, economists polled by Reuters believe. That would mark a slowdown from the 5.6 per cent pace logged in the fourth quarter when the economy got a big lift as businesses curbed efforts to cut inventories.
The advance report on US gross domestic product from the Commerce Department due at 8.30am (1230 GMT) should mark three straight quarters of growth as the economy digs out of its worst recession since the Great Depression.
GDP measures total goods and services output within US borders.
Though the economy took a step back from its brisk pace in late 2009, today’s report should show areas such as consumer and business spending proved more robust in the first quarter, analysts said.
The bulk of the growth in the fourth quarter came as businesses met more demand with new production and less by selling off goods sitting on the shelf.
Inventories are expected to play a lesser role in the first quarter, when consumers are seen taking up the baton.
“The key thing for sustaining and growing the US economy is consumer spending. Everything we know about the first quarter is looking very strong in that area,” said Kurt Karl, head of economic research at Swiss Re in New York.
Data that has already come in on consumer spending has been robust. Analysts expect consumer spending during the quarter grew at a rate anywhere between 3.2 per cent and 4 per cent.
Consumer spending, which normally accounts for about 70 per cent of US economic activity, grew only at a 1.6 per cent pace in the fourth quarter.
There have been worries the US recovery, which has been led by the manufacturing sector as businesses begin to rebuild inventories, could sputter if consumers did not come on board. These concerns are beginning to take a back seat.
“There is growing evidence of a handoff from stimulus and inventory-driven growth to broader sources of demand, although we still look for overall moderate growth,” said Julia Coronado, an economist at BNP Paribas in New York.
The US Federal Reserve on Wednesday noted economic activity had continued to strengthen in recent week and the labor market was starting to improve.
However, saying it still expects a modest recovery, it left benchmark overnight lending rates near zero and renewed its vow to keep them low for an extended period.
While inventories will still contribute to first quarter growth, it will be far less than the 3.8 per centage points of US growth it accounted for in the fourth quarter.
Excluding inventories, the economy is expected to have expanded at a 2.1 per cent rate, up from 1.7 per cent in the fourth quarter.
Boding well for the recovery is business spending on software and equipment, which is expected to have continued its upward trend in the January-March period.
“If they are spending on equipment already, it shows a lot of confidence for the future hiring which supports consumer spending. If we continue to have employment growth, we will have a good year,” said Swiss Re’s Karl.
Last month the economy enjoyed the strongest jobs growth in three years as private employers stepped up hiring.
Investment in new homes, which showed some hesitancy early this month, is expected to be a drag on growth in the first quarter — after two quarters of gains. Spending on structures likely subtracted from GDP for a seventh straight quarter.
With some of the rise in domestic demand being met through imports, a wider trade deficit will chip at growth in the first quarter."
Labels:
Economy
The Customer is no longer King
I took this news article from the online STAR this morning. I think it is worthy of reading and I have pasted it here.
Whose business is it anyway? - by John Zenkin
The Goldman Sachs fiasco should remind businesses the purpose of their existence
I was going to write about the rather dry subject of risk assessment this week until I watched the Goldman Sachs congressional testimony on Tuesday night and linked it in my mind with an article in The Economist of April 24 entitled “Shareholders vs Stakehol-ders: A New Idolatry” which deals with the old conundrum of where to focus in good governance: on shareholders, customers or employees.
The reason I changed my mind was that I was shocked to listen to three Goldman Sachs traders being unable or unwilling to answer a simple “Yes” or “No” question from Senator McCaskill of Missouri.
Her question was simple and to the point: did they have a fiduciary duty to their clients, which means looking after their clients’ interest first?
Only one of the panel of four said “Yes”.
The other three hedged their answers to the increasing anger of the senator as she repeated her question.
From the testimony it appeared that all that mattered was that Goldman Sachs made money at the expense of the clients it was supposed to serve, even going to the extent of shorting trades that they had sold to their clients as being good investments, even though internal memos described the assets involved as “shi**y”.
Whether their behaviour was illegal is the subject for the courts, though it certainly appeared that the senators believed strongly that what the traders had been doing was unethical.
As I watched, fascinated by the drama, it seemed to me Goldman Sachs had forgotten the first rule of business stated by the late Peter Drucker in 1946 in his book The Concept of the Corporation that “the purpose of business is to create and maintain satisfied customers”.
What is more, this rule of business was Goldman’s own rule as long as they were a partnership because they recognised that the long-term interests of the partners were to avoid alienating their customers in return for a short-term profit.
What seems to have happened since Goldman Sachs went public is that its employees have been able to look after their own interests at the expense of both customers and shareholders.
This is because the money they were playing with was no longer theirs, but that of other people – their investors and their shareholders.
This suggests that there are limits to how much a company can look after the interests of its employees, especially when they are paid enormous bonuses, apparently regardless of how much pain the shareholders are experiencing (as we have seen in the case of AIG or Merrill Lynch).
It is even more the case when the payout comes from the taxpayer in the form of bailouts.
It seems to me therefore that if there is an excessive focus on protecting shareholder or employee interests at the expense of the client or the customer, the company could put itself at unnecessary risk as far as its reputation and license to operate are concerned.
How soon Goldman Sachs will recover from the damage to its brand shown in the following quote from April 28’s Washington Post is anybody’s guess:
“There was a time when issuers would pay a premium to have Goldman Sachs underwrite their securities, just as there was a time when investors would pay a premium to buy into a Goldman-sponsored offering. Today, Goldman has fully monetised the value of its reputation, and anyone who pays such a premium is a fool.”
I was also struck by the fact that their style of defence bore similarities to those of Exxon in the Valdez case, Shell in the Brent Spar case and recently Toyota when it was found wanting on quality. When customers get upset or when NGOs go after companies, their argument is emotional – designed to be fought in the court of public opinion rather than in a court of law. Legal niceties, technical subtleties do not go down well with people who are looking for memorable soundbites.
What ordinary people want to see is someone who shows emotion and empathy, says he/she is sorry and that he/she will try to do better next time and then there can be closure. Lawyers, with their eye on court cases and damages, advise clients to never say sorry and to prevaricate and obfuscate. This merely increases the anger and frustration of the offended parties.
I have, however, yet to see a company suffer because it has focused too much on serving its clients or delighting its customers.
Perhaps a more correct approach in today’s world is that of the new boss of Unilever, quoted in The Economist article referred to earlier, where he says:
“I do not work for the shareholder, to be honest; I work for the consumer, the customer … I’m not driven and I don’t drive this business model by driving shareholder value.”
Well said!
The reason I changed my mind was that I was shocked to listen to three Goldman Sachs traders being unable or unwilling to answer a simple “Yes” or “No” question from Senator McCaskill of Missouri.
Her question was simple and to the point: did they have a fiduciary duty to their clients, which means looking after their clients’ interest first?
Only one of the panel of four said “Yes”.
The other three hedged their answers to the increasing anger of the senator as she repeated her question.
From the testimony it appeared that all that mattered was that Goldman Sachs made money at the expense of the clients it was supposed to serve, even going to the extent of shorting trades that they had sold to their clients as being good investments, even though internal memos described the assets involved as “shi**y”.
Whether their behaviour was illegal is the subject for the courts, though it certainly appeared that the senators believed strongly that what the traders had been doing was unethical.
As I watched, fascinated by the drama, it seemed to me Goldman Sachs had forgotten the first rule of business stated by the late Peter Drucker in 1946 in his book The Concept of the Corporation that “the purpose of business is to create and maintain satisfied customers”.
What is more, this rule of business was Goldman’s own rule as long as they were a partnership because they recognised that the long-term interests of the partners were to avoid alienating their customers in return for a short-term profit.
What seems to have happened since Goldman Sachs went public is that its employees have been able to look after their own interests at the expense of both customers and shareholders.
This is because the money they were playing with was no longer theirs, but that of other people – their investors and their shareholders.
This suggests that there are limits to how much a company can look after the interests of its employees, especially when they are paid enormous bonuses, apparently regardless of how much pain the shareholders are experiencing (as we have seen in the case of AIG or Merrill Lynch).
It is even more the case when the payout comes from the taxpayer in the form of bailouts.
It seems to me therefore that if there is an excessive focus on protecting shareholder or employee interests at the expense of the client or the customer, the company could put itself at unnecessary risk as far as its reputation and license to operate are concerned.
How soon Goldman Sachs will recover from the damage to its brand shown in the following quote from April 28’s Washington Post is anybody’s guess:
“There was a time when issuers would pay a premium to have Goldman Sachs underwrite their securities, just as there was a time when investors would pay a premium to buy into a Goldman-sponsored offering. Today, Goldman has fully monetised the value of its reputation, and anyone who pays such a premium is a fool.”
I was also struck by the fact that their style of defence bore similarities to those of Exxon in the Valdez case, Shell in the Brent Spar case and recently Toyota when it was found wanting on quality. When customers get upset or when NGOs go after companies, their argument is emotional – designed to be fought in the court of public opinion rather than in a court of law. Legal niceties, technical subtleties do not go down well with people who are looking for memorable soundbites.
What ordinary people want to see is someone who shows emotion and empathy, says he/she is sorry and that he/she will try to do better next time and then there can be closure. Lawyers, with their eye on court cases and damages, advise clients to never say sorry and to prevaricate and obfuscate. This merely increases the anger and frustration of the offended parties.
I have, however, yet to see a company suffer because it has focused too much on serving its clients or delighting its customers.
Perhaps a more correct approach in today’s world is that of the new boss of Unilever, quoted in The Economist article referred to earlier, where he says:
“I do not work for the shareholder, to be honest; I work for the consumer, the customer … I’m not driven and I don’t drive this business model by driving shareholder value.”
Well said!
Labels:
Perspectives
Malaysia: Hot Rush Hour
I took this from an article by Yow Hong Chieh in The Malaysian Insider as it will give you viewpoints of this current hot issue.
"Kuala Lumpur, April 30-
Any attempt by Malaysia to impose capital controls to stem the current inflow of hot capital will be viewed negatively by the market, say analysts and economists.
Their warning came after the possibility of hot money pouring into the country as a fiscal crisis grips several Western countries including Greece which is unable to resolve its problems, even with European Union and International Monetary Fund support.
In the last few days, Greece Spain and Portugal have all been downgraded by Standard & Poor’s, the credit ratings agency.
Maybank Investment’s Suhaimi Ilias said any capital controls would be “counter-productive” although governments and central banks in the region want a more balanced flow of capital between short-and long-term investments.
“I would be surprised if there was any form of capital controls emerging,” he told The Malaysian Insider.
“There’s a concern about hot money essentially and how to manage this to make sure that our economy, while growing, won’t create inflation risk.”
He said the main concern was most likely due to the glut of “cheap money” externally due to the low interest rates in more developed economies like the US.
Suhaimi also identified the anticipated yuan exchange policy change as a reason for increased proxy investments in regional assets.
“There might [also] be some outflow from Thailand looking for more defensive markets. I think Malaysia is benefitting from that.”
However, he warned that capital controls would make Malaysian assets less attractive to foreign investors.
“In an environment where it’s already very competitive to get capital, to adopt such a policy, as far as investment is concerned, [represents] a negative aspect.”
Suhaimi added that there were better options available to achieve “sustained rather than punctuated” capital inflows, citing market-based instruments.
“When you apply market-based instruments it can also contribute to the development of the financial market. There are a lot of benefits that come with it.”
He said the ringgit position as the best regional performing currency has not been seen for a long time, and cited this as an example of “letting the market do its work”.
Another economist, who did not want to be named, said he believed most Asian governments would not introduce strict capital controls.
“Based on our past experience from the Asian financial crisis, we know that capital controls... can be viewed as negative even in the long run,” he said.
“My personal view is that the problem is very similar to the early ‘90s where we saw a huge influx of hot money flowing into the emerging economies.
“I guess the risk [is that] the major industrialised countries will start to increase their interest rate… and then we’ll see outflow.”
While he viewed the recommendations issued by Standard Chartered on Monday to “adopt greater currency flexibility and broaden and deepen capital markets” positively, he said such changes could not take place overnight.
The report said that many emerging market economies, having recovered faster than the West, are on the receiving end of a surge in capital and liquidity that include bank lending, direct and portfolio investment and hot money.
“It takes time to develop... One cannot just transform the economy and the capital market in such a short span of time.”
Economist Zainal Aznam Yusof downplayed the issue of capital inflows and said it was “a manageable kind of situation”.
He explained that such movement of capital always happens when there are signs of recovery.
“We should not be excessively worried about that... We have to allow the exchange rate in Malaysia to react.”
He added that he expected the exchange rate to strengthen some more.
“The question is by how much.”
Zainal said instability in Thailand was probably a minor source of hot capital flowing into the country, reasoning that investors were already familiar with the country’s political landscape.
“The Thailand [political situation] has been persisting for a long time so we shouldn’t exaggerate the Thai factor.”
Lee Heng Guie, of CIMB Investment Bank, said that while it was a challenge for Asia to deal with the flood of cheap liquidity into the region, he believed that Malaysia was not experiencing such an influx.
“I don’t think we see this surging of this hot money into Malaysia at the moment.”
He added that Malaysia had a diversified asset class to absorb the current level of capital inflows, which were not big enough to warrant controls.
However, Lee warned that countries that are unable to stem the tide of short-term capital flows may experience some instability when the flow reverses.
“The IMF even suggested that some countries may think of selective capital controls to deal with these inflows of hot money.”
"Kuala Lumpur, April 30-
Any attempt by Malaysia to impose capital controls to stem the current inflow of hot capital will be viewed negatively by the market, say analysts and economists.
Their warning came after the possibility of hot money pouring into the country as a fiscal crisis grips several Western countries including Greece which is unable to resolve its problems, even with European Union and International Monetary Fund support.
In the last few days, Greece Spain and Portugal have all been downgraded by Standard & Poor’s, the credit ratings agency.
Maybank Investment’s Suhaimi Ilias said any capital controls would be “counter-productive” although governments and central banks in the region want a more balanced flow of capital between short-and long-term investments.
“I would be surprised if there was any form of capital controls emerging,” he told The Malaysian Insider.
“There’s a concern about hot money essentially and how to manage this to make sure that our economy, while growing, won’t create inflation risk.”
He said the main concern was most likely due to the glut of “cheap money” externally due to the low interest rates in more developed economies like the US.
Suhaimi also identified the anticipated yuan exchange policy change as a reason for increased proxy investments in regional assets.
“There might [also] be some outflow from Thailand looking for more defensive markets. I think Malaysia is benefitting from that.”
However, he warned that capital controls would make Malaysian assets less attractive to foreign investors.
“In an environment where it’s already very competitive to get capital, to adopt such a policy, as far as investment is concerned, [represents] a negative aspect.”
Suhaimi added that there were better options available to achieve “sustained rather than punctuated” capital inflows, citing market-based instruments.
“When you apply market-based instruments it can also contribute to the development of the financial market. There are a lot of benefits that come with it.”
He said the ringgit position as the best regional performing currency has not been seen for a long time, and cited this as an example of “letting the market do its work”.
Another economist, who did not want to be named, said he believed most Asian governments would not introduce strict capital controls.
“Based on our past experience from the Asian financial crisis, we know that capital controls... can be viewed as negative even in the long run,” he said.
“My personal view is that the problem is very similar to the early ‘90s where we saw a huge influx of hot money flowing into the emerging economies.
“I guess the risk [is that] the major industrialised countries will start to increase their interest rate… and then we’ll see outflow.”
While he viewed the recommendations issued by Standard Chartered on Monday to “adopt greater currency flexibility and broaden and deepen capital markets” positively, he said such changes could not take place overnight.
The report said that many emerging market economies, having recovered faster than the West, are on the receiving end of a surge in capital and liquidity that include bank lending, direct and portfolio investment and hot money.
“It takes time to develop... One cannot just transform the economy and the capital market in such a short span of time.”
Economist Zainal Aznam Yusof downplayed the issue of capital inflows and said it was “a manageable kind of situation”.
He explained that such movement of capital always happens when there are signs of recovery.
“We should not be excessively worried about that... We have to allow the exchange rate in Malaysia to react.”
He added that he expected the exchange rate to strengthen some more.
“The question is by how much.”
Zainal said instability in Thailand was probably a minor source of hot capital flowing into the country, reasoning that investors were already familiar with the country’s political landscape.
“The Thailand [political situation] has been persisting for a long time so we shouldn’t exaggerate the Thai factor.”
Lee Heng Guie, of CIMB Investment Bank, said that while it was a challenge for Asia to deal with the flood of cheap liquidity into the region, he believed that Malaysia was not experiencing such an influx.
“I don’t think we see this surging of this hot money into Malaysia at the moment.”
He added that Malaysia had a diversified asset class to absorb the current level of capital inflows, which were not big enough to warrant controls.
However, Lee warned that countries that are unable to stem the tide of short-term capital flows may experience some instability when the flow reverses.
“The IMF even suggested that some countries may think of selective capital controls to deal with these inflows of hot money.”
Labels:
Economy
Malaysia: Civil Litigation Rears its Head
Well, we have become a litigators' country,haven't we?.
With so many civil suits and counter suits,what may become of us poor folks? Is money the driver behind all the civil suits that have been filed lately?
I remembered at one time, the former PM of Malaysia did want to cap civil litigation awards only at RM10,000. I wonder what happened since so many litigants have been awarded RM10 million even on those who have died.
Lately we have heard again about these suits.
The one that was pretty interesting was when the current MB of Selangor won against Bank Islam.
Now, we have the ones involving Zaid Ibrahim. He is filing civil suits against the Election Commission for helping BN steal the Hulu Selangor Elections as well as a suit against Utusan Melayu for defaming him as an alcoholic. The latter is interesting as he is only seeking damages of a token Ringgit Malaysia.
And let us not forget Ibrahim Ali's suit against The Sun newspaper for purportedly painting him as a racist.
Quo vadis, Malaysia?
With so many civil suits and counter suits,what may become of us poor folks? Is money the driver behind all the civil suits that have been filed lately?
I remembered at one time, the former PM of Malaysia did want to cap civil litigation awards only at RM10,000. I wonder what happened since so many litigants have been awarded RM10 million even on those who have died.
Lately we have heard again about these suits.
The one that was pretty interesting was when the current MB of Selangor won against Bank Islam.
Now, we have the ones involving Zaid Ibrahim. He is filing civil suits against the Election Commission for helping BN steal the Hulu Selangor Elections as well as a suit against Utusan Melayu for defaming him as an alcoholic. The latter is interesting as he is only seeking damages of a token Ringgit Malaysia.
And let us not forget Ibrahim Ali's suit against The Sun newspaper for purportedly painting him as a racist.
Quo vadis, Malaysia?
Labels:
Perspectives
BNM: May Revise up wards 2010 GDP for Malaysia
Well,what do you know. After JP Morgan and HSBC, even Zeti of Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM)has jumped on the bandwagon to swear that the Malaysian economy has indeed seen good growth so far in 2010. As such BNM may revise up its economic growth forecast for 2010 due to this so called "continued improvement in the economy".
She has this to say. "We have realised there’s potential for an upward revision. The review could be done in the middle of this year where the figures could be used in the budget.”
BNM has previously said the economy could expand at between 4.5 to 5.5 per cent this year.
She has this to say. "We have realised there’s potential for an upward revision. The review could be done in the middle of this year where the figures could be used in the budget.”
BNM has previously said the economy could expand at between 4.5 to 5.5 per cent this year.
Labels:
Economy
April 28, 2010
Genting Moves up Despite Competition from Marina Bay Sands
This is interesting.
Despite the opening of the second casino, the crowd at Resorts World Sentosa seems usual. There was no sudden drop.
Let us read this Reuters report.
As such, the benchmark Straits Times Index was 0.56 per cent higher as of 0310 GMT today.
Shares of Genting Singapore rose as much as 9.2 per cent to 94.5 Singapore cents, two days after rival operator Las Vegas Sands opened the city-state’s second casino.
“Some people have observed that for the past couple of days, the crowd at Genting was still brisk,” a trader with a local brokerage said.
CIMB also upgraded Genting Singapore to “outperform” and maintained its target price of S$1.23.
“We believe that both properties have different propositions, reaching out to different market segments,” CIMB said in a report.
“RWS (Resorts World at Sentosa) will appeal to the family-oriented gamblers while MBS (Marina Bay Sands), with its extensive retail and MICE facilities and CBD location, is well position to capture a slice of business travellers”.
Around 0310 GMT, Genting Singapore was up 8.1 per cent at 93.5 Singapore cents with over 213 million shares changing hands.
Despite the opening of the second casino, the crowd at Resorts World Sentosa seems usual. There was no sudden drop.
Let us read this Reuters report.
As such, the benchmark Straits Times Index was 0.56 per cent higher as of 0310 GMT today.
Shares of Genting Singapore rose as much as 9.2 per cent to 94.5 Singapore cents, two days after rival operator Las Vegas Sands opened the city-state’s second casino.
“Some people have observed that for the past couple of days, the crowd at Genting was still brisk,” a trader with a local brokerage said.
CIMB also upgraded Genting Singapore to “outperform” and maintained its target price of S$1.23.
“We believe that both properties have different propositions, reaching out to different market segments,” CIMB said in a report.
“RWS (Resorts World at Sentosa) will appeal to the family-oriented gamblers while MBS (Marina Bay Sands), with its extensive retail and MICE facilities and CBD location, is well position to capture a slice of business travellers”.
Around 0310 GMT, Genting Singapore was up 8.1 per cent at 93.5 Singapore cents with over 213 million shares changing hands.
Labels:
Stocks
April 26, 2010
Property: 2010 will be a A Better Year
This Bernama Report indicates that the Malaysian property market will see better prospects in the current year.
"The property market this year will perform better than in 2009 due to an improvement in the general economy, Deputy Finance Minister Datuk Dr Awang Adek Hussin said today.
As to whether, normalisation of the overnight policy rate (OPR) by Bank Negara Malaysia would affect it, he said: “Bank Negara may normalise the rate, but I think, not to the extent of impacting adversely the property market”.
Awang Adek pointed out a marginal drop of 0.7 per cent of the total volume of transactions last year, while the total value reduced at a higher rate of 8.3 per cent.
He said a strong banking system will also help boost the property market, especially the residential segment, while stimulus spending supports the non-residential sub-sector.
On the construction side, Awang Adek said there would be ample office space in the market for the next couple of years, as indicated by the available space of 11.8 million-sq-m in the country.
On the RM67 billion stimulus package, he said spending for the first package, was virtually completed and for the second, it was well underway.
Meanwhile, commenting further on the property market’s performance, Abdullah Thalith of INSPENS said it was the right time for BNM to increase the OPR to curb speculation elements.
"The property market this year will perform better than in 2009 due to an improvement in the general economy, Deputy Finance Minister Datuk Dr Awang Adek Hussin said today.
As to whether, normalisation of the overnight policy rate (OPR) by Bank Negara Malaysia would affect it, he said: “Bank Negara may normalise the rate, but I think, not to the extent of impacting adversely the property market”.
Awang Adek pointed out a marginal drop of 0.7 per cent of the total volume of transactions last year, while the total value reduced at a higher rate of 8.3 per cent.
He said a strong banking system will also help boost the property market, especially the residential segment, while stimulus spending supports the non-residential sub-sector.
On the construction side, Awang Adek said there would be ample office space in the market for the next couple of years, as indicated by the available space of 11.8 million-sq-m in the country.
On the RM67 billion stimulus package, he said spending for the first package, was virtually completed and for the second, it was well underway.
Meanwhile, commenting further on the property market’s performance, Abdullah Thalith of INSPENS said it was the right time for BNM to increase the OPR to curb speculation elements.
Labels:
Economy
April 25, 2010
Pork Barrel Politics Won!
Whichever party won in Hulu Selangor does not matter now.
We have seen the best in campaigning and we have seen the worse.
We have seen cash hand-outs; we have seen other form of near-cash handouts.
We have seen election offences done in plain sight with little action done to curb them.
Who won? Pork barrel politics and the recipients.
My regards to Kamalanathan who pipped Zaid and to the people of Hulu Selangor who had most of their governmental problems solved within a fortnight.
Huray! This is sheer magic.
We have seen the best in campaigning and we have seen the worse.
We have seen cash hand-outs; we have seen other form of near-cash handouts.
We have seen election offences done in plain sight with little action done to curb them.
Who won? Pork barrel politics and the recipients.
My regards to Kamalanathan who pipped Zaid and to the people of Hulu Selangor who had most of their governmental problems solved within a fortnight.
Huray! This is sheer magic.
Labels:
Perspectives
April 24, 2010
The Ringgit Draw on the Stock Market
What does a strengthening ringgit do to our stock market?
TA Securities analyst Stephen Soo explains a firm ringgit is a boost to the stock market as it encourages fund inflows.
Although he sees bonds as the main beneficiary of a stronger ringgit, with equities next, he is more bullish on equities for the second half of the year, on the back of the tabling of the 10th Malaysian Plan and the release of more details on the New Economic Model.
“In the last two years, Malaysia has experienced a net outflow of foreign direct investments (FDIs). As the ringgit strengthens, this will at least stop some of the outflows and support liquidity flows. This liquidity will need to go somewhere and stocks will benefit,” says Soo.
Bank Negara data points to an FDI reversal in 2007, with net outflows of direct investments of RM9.14bil. This increased to RM26.06bil in 2008 and to RM14.62bil in the first nine months of last year.
Portfolio investments in Malaysia booked a net inflow of RM8.8bil in the third quarter of 2009 after four quarters of significant outflows.
JF Apex Securities Bhd CEO Lim Teck Seng feels that the recent inflow of funds have not had much impact on the stock market as most of the foreign inflows were for fixed income and not equities.
“A strong currency may not favour stock markets as theoretically, Malaysian stocks have become more expensive. For the moment, foreign funds prefer to enjoy yields rather than the riskier returns from equities,” he says.
Private equity banker Sherilyn Foong says portfolio inflows seem to be faster and nimbler than FDIs. “We’re coming from a low base on the bonds front. My main concern would be if it is, to a significant extent, hot money,” she says.
MCIS Zurich Insurance Bhd head of fixed income Michael Chang shares Lim’s views. “Buying government bonds is probably one of the easiest ways if I am expecting the country’s currency to rise,” he says.
“The risk is deemed moderate and bonds are also fairly liquid investments. Offshore investors can buy into the Malaysian Government Securities (MGS) as it is as good as buying the Malaysian currency,” says Chang.
Long-term hazard
While most people are of the view that a rising currency signals more investments flowing into the country, and therefore contributing to a rising stock market, this is a mere correlation and not a direct impact.
Past studies by ABN Amro Bank and the London Business School have shown that strong currencies do not lead to generous profits from the equity markets.
According to the research, countries with weak currencies saw greater stock returns than ones with strengthening currencies.
A broker from a local house says that a strong currency only offers short term benefit for the market. “Over the longer term, it is not good for an exporting economy and for the stock market,” he says.
Investing in stocks can be viewed as risky compared with other assets. When the central bank raises interest rates, government securities such as the MGS are often regarded as the safest investments and will usually experience a corresponding increase in interest rates.
In other words, the risk-free rate of return goes up, making these investments more desirable and a lot safer than stocks. With stocks, one has to factor in the risk premium as well.
The ringgit has strengthened some 7% to 3.2015 against the US dollar since the beginning of this year. This will impact the earnings of Malaysian exporters and various other sectors of the economy.
Over the short term, exporters such as those in the rubber glove, technology, and electrical and electronics sectors may suffer setbacks.
Says OSK Research director and research head Chris Eng: “A stronger ringgit is better for the country as long as it strengthens gradually. Lately, the ringgit has strengthened rather quickly and this may not give exporters time to pass on (additional) costs to their customers.”
Winners and losers
Rubber glove stocks have come under selling pressure of late as investors worry about a repeat of the share price collapse in 2008, when investors assumed that record latex prices, high energy prices and a weakening US dollar would dampen glovemakers’ earnings significantly.
Those who remain bullish about the industry contend that the demand for rubber gloves is resilient and that the listed manufacturers, because they are market leaders, will be able to hike selling prices to absorb cost increases.
A stronger ringgit means imports tend to cost less. Manufacturers that rely significantly on imported raw materials stand to benefit and will likely see their margins improve, provided their output is largely sold in the domestic market.
With the US dollar weakening against the ringgit, commodities such as oil and gold, which are bought and sold in US dollars, will be cheaper for purchasers in Malaysia.
Eng says in this context, the local airlines are beneficiaries, as fuel is denominated in US dollars while sales are mostly in ringgit.
“In Malaysia Airlines Bhd’s case, their revenue is mostly derived in Australian and Asian currencies. So they benefit from the strengthening ringgit,” he says.
Others gaining from the surging ringgit include automotive and food-based companies that import products in US dollars but sell them to Malaysian buyers. Companies that have large foreign debts – Tenaga Nasional Bhd for example – will also benefit. On the flip side, MISC Bhd, whose revenue is mostly in US dollars, may be at a disadvantage.
Profit impact
Eng says a stronger ringgit helps control inflation, hence strengthening domestic consumption.
One line of argument is that a strong currency also means that imported raw materials are cheaper, thus lowering inventory cost. This leads to lower borrowing obligations and hence less interest to pay.
Says a senior analyst: “The price of the finished good also goes down and this leads to a lower cost of living. The strength of a currency is an indicator of economic health.”
According to the Big Mac index, the ringgit is 40% below its fair-value benchmark with the US dollar as at March 16 (at 3.3245 per US dollar).
The Big Mac index is based on the theory of purchasing-power parity, the notion that a dollar should buy the same amount in all countries.
“Based on a trade-weighted index, the ringgit should be fairly valued at 3.23 per US dollar, which is almost close to the current level,” says AmResearch senior economist Manokaran Mottain.
He is forecasting exports to grow by some 7% to 8% and Malaysia’s gross domestic product to hit 5% this year.
Says Chang: “While some exporters lament the stronger currency, a lot of them are importers too and their costs of production have fallen. The most substantial profits are often made in finished goods, not in raw materials.
“Profits made from finished goods are more sustainable as it gives better margins on a longer-term basis. It allow us to move up the value chain.”
An observer says that while raw materials may be cheaper due to the strengthening ringgit, Malaysian exporters will still be in the losing end when selling finished goods to the global market as their products will be denominated in US dollars.
Labels:
Economy
April 23, 2010
Malaysia: Speculation-driven Housing market?
The jump in home prices lately has raised concern that speculators may be taking advantage of the easy home financing scheme.
Since the introduction of the scheme early last year, property sales have improved considerably while prices in some locations in the Klang Valley and Penang have edged up by between 10% and 20%.
Under the housing facility, buyers only need to fork out a small deposit of 5% or 10% of the property price and do not need to make any further payment until after their property has been delivered to them.
Developers are absorbing the stamp duty, legal fees and interest cost during the construction stage.
While some industry players agree that there is cause for concern, most feel the housing facility is still needed at least over the next 12 months until the market is back on a stronger footing.
Ireka Development Management Sdn Bhd chief operating officer Lim Ech Chan said easy-payment schemes had its pros and cons.
With the low entry cost, such schemes enabled those who have difficulties buying a house to put down the initial 5% or 10% downpayment and have their own roof over their heads two to three years later.
“When SP Setia first came out with the scheme, it helped the mass market a great deal,” Lim said.
He said the drawback was that since buyers did not have to pay anything for the next two to three years, they may sell their units when the project was completed.
“If the project is handed to them during a boom, they can sell it. But if the project is handed to them during a weak economic environment, they will have to pay for the mortgages.”
ECM Libra head of research Bernard Ching said the recent 25 basis point increase in overnight policy rate had prompted more buyers to buy and lock in at the current interest rates as they might expect the cost of fund to rise further.
“This is the best time to buy a property for own occupancy as entry cost is at an all time low. As seen in the high buying interest in the past six months, many buyers are buying to hedge against rising inflation down the road,” Ching told StarBiz.
According to Association of Valuers, Property Managers, Estate Agents and Property Consultants in the Private Sector president James Wong, developers need to catch up with “lost time” when launches had to be deferred for more than a year as a result of the global financial crisis.
“Buyers were facing cashflow problems then and needed to watch their spending. Buying big-ticket items like a house is the last thing on their mind. There are merits in the scheme as it has lowered the entry cost and make house purchase more affordable for buyers.
“Such financing schemes require a lot of resources and only the big developers with strong financial resources can afford to adopt them. In a way, it is a variant of the build-then-sell concept,” Wong said.
He said there was still no risk of overheating in the market as the double-digit rise in property prices was registered only for very niche projects in very-sought-after locations where demand far surpassed supply.
“Property prices on the whole are still much lower compared with those in other countries. While there is still upside potential, prices will not spiral out of control,” Wong said.
Since buying interest recovered in the past few months, developers are no longer offering the housing facility across the board but only for selective projects.
“Besides, Bank Negara is very stringent and only eligible buyers who have the required minimum income level will be able to sign up for the housing packages,” Wong added.
On its downside, he said while the scheme might had drummed up sales, it could give the wrong indication of the real or effective demand for houses.
Admitting that there would always be speculators in the market, SP Setia Bhd president and chief executive officer Tan Sri Liew Kee Sin said as long as speculation was not rampant, it was actually good for the market as it demonstrated confidence and would improve market liquidity.
“The key is for banks to be vigilant in their credit assessment to determine the borrowers’ ability to service the loan. They should also be selective in terms of the projects and developers to whom they extend the scheme.”
Liew said the higher prices reflected insufficient supply to meet the strong demand for projects in good locations and there was ample room for further price appreciation for good landed residential property.
Since the scheme was launched early last year, SP Setia’s monthly sales averaged more than RM190mil between January and July 2009, which was a new sales benchmark for the company.
Mah Sing Group Bhd president Tan Sri Leong Hoy Kum said of the company’s RM727mil sales recorded last year, 51% of the buyers signed up for the easy financing facility. The sales was much higher than its target of RM453mil.
While the developers are raking it in, the banks are doing so too. So who is paying the piper. someone must!
Since the introduction of the scheme early last year, property sales have improved considerably while prices in some locations in the Klang Valley and Penang have edged up by between 10% and 20%.
Under the housing facility, buyers only need to fork out a small deposit of 5% or 10% of the property price and do not need to make any further payment until after their property has been delivered to them.
Developers are absorbing the stamp duty, legal fees and interest cost during the construction stage.
While some industry players agree that there is cause for concern, most feel the housing facility is still needed at least over the next 12 months until the market is back on a stronger footing.
With the low entry cost, such schemes enabled those who have difficulties buying a house to put down the initial 5% or 10% downpayment and have their own roof over their heads two to three years later.
“When SP Setia first came out with the scheme, it helped the mass market a great deal,” Lim said.
He said the drawback was that since buyers did not have to pay anything for the next two to three years, they may sell their units when the project was completed.
“If the project is handed to them during a boom, they can sell it. But if the project is handed to them during a weak economic environment, they will have to pay for the mortgages.”
ECM Libra head of research Bernard Ching said the recent 25 basis point increase in overnight policy rate had prompted more buyers to buy and lock in at the current interest rates as they might expect the cost of fund to rise further.
“This is the best time to buy a property for own occupancy as entry cost is at an all time low. As seen in the high buying interest in the past six months, many buyers are buying to hedge against rising inflation down the road,” Ching told StarBiz.
According to Association of Valuers, Property Managers, Estate Agents and Property Consultants in the Private Sector president James Wong, developers need to catch up with “lost time” when launches had to be deferred for more than a year as a result of the global financial crisis.
“Buyers were facing cashflow problems then and needed to watch their spending. Buying big-ticket items like a house is the last thing on their mind. There are merits in the scheme as it has lowered the entry cost and make house purchase more affordable for buyers.
“Such financing schemes require a lot of resources and only the big developers with strong financial resources can afford to adopt them. In a way, it is a variant of the build-then-sell concept,” Wong said.
He said there was still no risk of overheating in the market as the double-digit rise in property prices was registered only for very niche projects in very-sought-after locations where demand far surpassed supply.
“Property prices on the whole are still much lower compared with those in other countries. While there is still upside potential, prices will not spiral out of control,” Wong said.
Since buying interest recovered in the past few months, developers are no longer offering the housing facility across the board but only for selective projects.
“Besides, Bank Negara is very stringent and only eligible buyers who have the required minimum income level will be able to sign up for the housing packages,” Wong added.
On its downside, he said while the scheme might had drummed up sales, it could give the wrong indication of the real or effective demand for houses.
Admitting that there would always be speculators in the market, SP Setia Bhd president and chief executive officer Tan Sri Liew Kee Sin said as long as speculation was not rampant, it was actually good for the market as it demonstrated confidence and would improve market liquidity.
“The key is for banks to be vigilant in their credit assessment to determine the borrowers’ ability to service the loan. They should also be selective in terms of the projects and developers to whom they extend the scheme.”
Liew said the higher prices reflected insufficient supply to meet the strong demand for projects in good locations and there was ample room for further price appreciation for good landed residential property.
Since the scheme was launched early last year, SP Setia’s monthly sales averaged more than RM190mil between January and July 2009, which was a new sales benchmark for the company.
Mah Sing Group Bhd president Tan Sri Leong Hoy Kum said of the company’s RM727mil sales recorded last year, 51% of the buyers signed up for the easy financing facility. The sales was much higher than its target of RM453mil.
While the developers are raking it in, the banks are doing so too. So who is paying the piper. someone must!
Labels:
Perspectives
April 22, 2010
Malaysia: Just Playing Poker with 2010 GDP Projections
Amresearch has been going hyperbole in their projection of the 2010 GDP for Malaysia.
They based their projection on the underpinning of household spending and exports that is driving Malaysia’s economic growth to levels unseen since 1996.
They based their projection on the underpinning of household spending and exports that is driving Malaysia’s economic growth to levels unseen since 1996.
Amresearch’s revised forecast follows announcements by the Malaysian Institute of Economic Research (MIER) and financial services firm JP Morgan that also upgraded Malaysia’s economic growth in 2010.
Strengthening domestic and external conditions led Amresearch to upgrade Malaysia’s economic growth to 8 per cent in 2010 from 5 per cent previously. It also predicted GDP growth of 6 per cent for 2011.
Amresearch said that first quarter growth “probably” expanded at 8.9 per cent which would make it the fastest in a decade.
“With prospects of a disappointing global upswing getting dimmer, real GDP will be sustained at around 6 per cent in 2011,” said Amresearch senior economist Manokaran Mottain in a report today.
He also sees the ringgit ending the year at RM3.10 to the US dollar which, he says, will be reflective of its fair value.
Interest rates are expected to rise to 3 per cent due to the stronger economic momentum and higher inflation rates but they are not expected to affect growth.
“It (the overnight policy rate) will not choke the recovery process,” said Manokaran.
Inflation, meanwhile, is expected to rise to 2.5 per cent in tandem with improving economic conditions and potential adjustments to prices.
Manokaran said he expects the manufacturing sector to be the main growth driver this year, led by the electrical and electronics
He also expects private consumption to grow at 4.5 per cent versus just 0.8 per cent last year.
“Private consumption is expected to rise on the back of improvements in the labour market, disposable incomes and consumer confidence,” said Manokaran.
He also sees exports and imports posting double-digit growth of 15 per cent and 16 per cent respectively in 2010 as well as a higher current account surplus of RM125 billion or 20 per cent of GDP.
The World Bank had on Monday released a report saying that Malaysia could grow by as much as 5.7 per cent this year but warned that growth could stall if economic reforms were not implemented.
MIER last week revised its GDP growth forecast for 2010 to 5.2 per cent from 3.7 per cent due to improving business and consumer sentiment. JP Morgan had earlier this month also revised Malaysia’s GDP growth forecast to 7.7 per cent from 6.8 per cent previously.
I will take these projections with a chunk of salt.
Labels:
Economy
Malaysia: The National Debt Audit
PM Najib has just disclosed the national debt of the nation as at 31 December 2009. It amounts to RM36.4 billion or 53.7% of the GDP. Of this, RM348.6 billion,equivalent to 96.2% was domestic debt while RM13.9 billion (3.8%) was external debt.
“The small amount of external debt is in line with the government’s current policy which prioritises domestic borrowings to finance the country’s development projects as the cost is cheaper and there is less exposure to foreign exchange risk,” he said.
Najib said these debt instruments were subscribed by financial institutions, insurance companies and social security institutions.
On the borrowings for projects, he said the financiers were multilateral institutions such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank and Islamic Development Bank while the bilateral institutions included Japan For International Cooperation (JBIC).
He said the interest rates varied and depended on the tenure of the loan and the prevailing market conditions when the bonds were issued.
Najib said the government’s contingent liabilities meanwhile were in the form of guarantees for the borrowings of statutory bodies and government companies.
As of Dec 31, 2008, the contingent liabilities of the government stood at RM69.2 billion comprising domestic borrowings of RM59.3 billion (86 per cent) and external borrowings of RM9.9 billion (14 per cent),” he said.
He said the guarantees involved two statutory bodies and 16 government-linked companies.
Meanwhile Bank Negara disclosed Malaysia's international reserves was US$95.7 billion (RM313 billion) on April 15 compared to US$95.3 billion on March 31.
The reserves were enough to finance 8.8 months of retained imports and were four times the short-term external debt.
So, do you get a picture of our reserves and indebtedness now?
“The small amount of external debt is in line with the government’s current policy which prioritises domestic borrowings to finance the country’s development projects as the cost is cheaper and there is less exposure to foreign exchange risk,” he said.
Najib said these debt instruments were subscribed by financial institutions, insurance companies and social security institutions.
On the borrowings for projects, he said the financiers were multilateral institutions such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank and Islamic Development Bank while the bilateral institutions included Japan For International Cooperation (JBIC).
He said the interest rates varied and depended on the tenure of the loan and the prevailing market conditions when the bonds were issued.
Najib said the government’s contingent liabilities meanwhile were in the form of guarantees for the borrowings of statutory bodies and government companies.
As of Dec 31, 2008, the contingent liabilities of the government stood at RM69.2 billion comprising domestic borrowings of RM59.3 billion (86 per cent) and external borrowings of RM9.9 billion (14 per cent),” he said.
He said the guarantees involved two statutory bodies and 16 government-linked companies.
Meanwhile Bank Negara disclosed Malaysia's international reserves was US$95.7 billion (RM313 billion) on April 15 compared to US$95.3 billion on March 31.
The reserves were enough to finance 8.8 months of retained imports and were four times the short-term external debt.
So, do you get a picture of our reserves and indebtedness now?
Labels:
Economy
April 21, 2010
Splash Offer Unlikely to be Accepted
The revised offer from construction outfit Gamuda Bhd’s 40%-owned associate, Syarikat Pengeluar Air Sungai Selangor Sdn Bhd (Splash), to the Federal and Selangor governments for the takeover of the water services industry in the state is unlikely to go through.
Analysts believe that the stumbling block remained the compensation payable to Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd (Syabas), a 70%-owned subsidiary of Puncak Niaga Holdings Bhd, as the former’s concession would be terminated after the acquisition.
Gamuda had told Bursa Malaysia on Tuesday that the revised offer still stood at RM10.75bil but with the water assets to be parked under the Federal Government’s Pengurusan Aset Air Bhd (PAAB) to comply with the asset light policy under the Water Services Industry Act 2006.
Splash would then lease the assets from PAAB at a rental rate of 6% per year with an annual escalation of 2.5% under a 30-year operating licence.
Currently, the state’s water assets are parked under four concessionaires – Syabas, Splash, Puncak Niaga (M) Sdn Bhd and Konsortium Abbas Sdn Bhd.
Looming over the takeover of Selangor’s water assets, which has been ongoing for the past two years, is a water tariff hike. The increase was initially supposed to be implemented in January last year, then deferred to March but has yet to happen due to the issues surrounding the takeover.
An analyst with a local investment bank said this arrangement would not be very attractive to Puncak Niaga as the company was also looking to obtain the licence to operate and maintain the state’s water infrastructure.
“The offer price will have to reflect some form of compensation for Syabas’ loss of the concession, which in effect means Puncak Niaga exiting the business,” he told StarBiz.
OSK Research Sdn Bhd analyst Vincent Lim agreed, saying the compensation issue would have to be resolved or further talks would not get anywhere.
He said one option was for PAAB to make a higher offer.
Lim said in a report yesterday the revised offer only involved a net book value pricing for Syabas’ water assets but did not take into account the compensation payable to the company from the loss of future profits.
“Although the new offer is favourable to Splash in terms of a lower capital outlay and it being an asset light licensing model, we think that Puncak Niaga, as an indirect party to the offer, will not agree to the terms as it does not make clear Syabas’ compensation status should its concession operation cease after the restructuring,” he said.
AmResearch Sdn Bhd analyst Mak Hoy Ken said in a report that the possibility of other water entities including Puncak Niaga directly negotiating with PAAB to migrate their water assets and liabilities could not be precluded should the former not take up Splash’s offer.
He added that the valuation basis for Splash’s offer had yet to be ascertained nor had there been a specific timeline mentioned.
Mak said the deal would still need the approval of the stakeholders of the state’s fragmented supply chain including the Selangor government, which holds 30% of Splash, 55% of Konsortium Abbas and 30% of Syabas.
Analysts believe that the stumbling block remained the compensation payable to Syarikat Bekalan Air Selangor Sdn Bhd (Syabas), a 70%-owned subsidiary of Puncak Niaga Holdings Bhd, as the former’s concession would be terminated after the acquisition.
Gamuda had told Bursa Malaysia on Tuesday that the revised offer still stood at RM10.75bil but with the water assets to be parked under the Federal Government’s Pengurusan Aset Air Bhd (PAAB) to comply with the asset light policy under the Water Services Industry Act 2006.
Splash would then lease the assets from PAAB at a rental rate of 6% per year with an annual escalation of 2.5% under a 30-year operating licence.
Currently, the state’s water assets are parked under four concessionaires – Syabas, Splash, Puncak Niaga (M) Sdn Bhd and Konsortium Abbas Sdn Bhd.
Looming over the takeover of Selangor’s water assets, which has been ongoing for the past two years, is a water tariff hike. The increase was initially supposed to be implemented in January last year, then deferred to March but has yet to happen due to the issues surrounding the takeover.
An analyst with a local investment bank said this arrangement would not be very attractive to Puncak Niaga as the company was also looking to obtain the licence to operate and maintain the state’s water infrastructure.
“The offer price will have to reflect some form of compensation for Syabas’ loss of the concession, which in effect means Puncak Niaga exiting the business,” he told StarBiz.
OSK Research Sdn Bhd analyst Vincent Lim agreed, saying the compensation issue would have to be resolved or further talks would not get anywhere.
He said one option was for PAAB to make a higher offer.
Lim said in a report yesterday the revised offer only involved a net book value pricing for Syabas’ water assets but did not take into account the compensation payable to the company from the loss of future profits.
“Although the new offer is favourable to Splash in terms of a lower capital outlay and it being an asset light licensing model, we think that Puncak Niaga, as an indirect party to the offer, will not agree to the terms as it does not make clear Syabas’ compensation status should its concession operation cease after the restructuring,” he said.
AmResearch Sdn Bhd analyst Mak Hoy Ken said in a report that the possibility of other water entities including Puncak Niaga directly negotiating with PAAB to migrate their water assets and liabilities could not be precluded should the former not take up Splash’s offer.
He added that the valuation basis for Splash’s offer had yet to be ascertained nor had there been a specific timeline mentioned.
Mak said the deal would still need the approval of the stakeholders of the state’s fragmented supply chain including the Selangor government, which holds 30% of Splash, 55% of Konsortium Abbas and 30% of Syabas.
Labels:
Perspectives
Peter: It Is Your Call!
I am not political but it is time that they settled this water fragmentation mess left over from the former government of Selangor. Many hidden hands were involved but that is history and the people wants to know when they can get clean water and to ensure that the water subsidy scheme remains in place.
The person everyone is looking at for a solution is Peter Chin, the Federal Minister of Water. What ever happened to the restructuring exercise?
Let us look at some of the salient points involved here.
The Selangor people wants the best solution. They want the best deal. They are hoping that with the powers vested in him viz the Water Services Industry Act (WSIA), he may work out something good.
“Section 114 of WSIA, if invoked, gives the minister the power to force the water players to hand over the assets in the name of national interest.”
So far there have been three offers. Let us look at them at close range.
i. The Selangor government’s offer to restructure the state’s water industry.
Apparently it is fair to all water concessionaires as well as benefit the rakyat guaranteeing no tariff increases for the foreseeable future. This is structured in such a manner due to the lower proposed leasing cost by the state government from PAAB of approximately five per cent. Compare this with Gamuda’s cost of six per cent.
Further cost savings can be realised by “the lower cost of acquiring all assets of water concessionaires”, previously estimated at between RM9.2 billion and RM10.3 billion.
The State Government acquisition is based on the principle and philosophy of not seeking to “maximise profits but instead maximise returns” to the public. Compare this to Gamuda Bhd's offer that will instead guarantee equity returns in excess of 10 per cent per annum.
This offer was the attempt by the Selangor government, via its investment arm Kumpulan Darul Ehsan Bhd, to take over the restructuring of the water industry thereby fulfilling its promise to provide cheaper water to its electorate.
The state’s offer of RM9.2 billion was accepted by water concessionaires, Konsortium ABASS and Splash, but was rejected by Syabas and Puncak Niaga Sdn Bhd (PNSB).
ii. The Federal Government Bid
Done through its Water Asset Management Company (PAAB). It made an “informal” offer to acquire all assets from the water concessionaires amounting to RM10.3 billion in March 2010.However, the offer was rejected by water concessionaires, Abass and Splash, while both Syabas and Puncak Niaga Sdn Bhd (PNSB) have missed the April 6 deadline to repond.
“The deal by the Selangor state government is the best there is for the rakyat as we have affirmed no tariff increases for the foreseeable future. This can be achieved due to the lower proposed leasing cost by the state government from PAAB of approximately five per cent, compared to Gamuda’s cost of six per cent.
Pua added that further cost savings would be realised by “the lower cost of acquiring all assets of water concessionaires”, which was previously estimated at between RM9.2 billion and RM10.3 billion.
He added that the state government was not seeking to “maximise profits but instead maximise returns” to the public. Gamuda Bhd has confirmed their offer will guarantee equity returns in excess of 10 per cent per annum.
iii. Gamuda also made a revised offer yesterday to acquire all of the state’s water concessionaires through its associate, Splash, and this would cost the conglomerate RM10.75 billion. This is the best in terms of the valuation of the water concessionaires, being the highest offer on the table. They have promised to freeze water tariff increase in the first year and increase only between 2-3 per cent annually for subsequent years.
The Pahang-Selangor Water Transfer Project has already started a month back and yet we see a lack of will among politicians to resolve the problem of the restructuring of water concessionaires.
Who are we waiting for? Godot?
We must be a first world nation with a third world mentality.
The person everyone is looking at for a solution is Peter Chin, the Federal Minister of Water. What ever happened to the restructuring exercise?
Let us look at some of the salient points involved here.
The Selangor people wants the best solution. They want the best deal. They are hoping that with the powers vested in him viz the Water Services Industry Act (WSIA), he may work out something good.
“Section 114 of WSIA, if invoked, gives the minister the power to force the water players to hand over the assets in the name of national interest.”
So far there have been three offers. Let us look at them at close range.
i. The Selangor government’s offer to restructure the state’s water industry.
Apparently it is fair to all water concessionaires as well as benefit the rakyat guaranteeing no tariff increases for the foreseeable future. This is structured in such a manner due to the lower proposed leasing cost by the state government from PAAB of approximately five per cent. Compare this with Gamuda’s cost of six per cent.
Further cost savings can be realised by “the lower cost of acquiring all assets of water concessionaires”, previously estimated at between RM9.2 billion and RM10.3 billion.
The State Government acquisition is based on the principle and philosophy of not seeking to “maximise profits but instead maximise returns” to the public. Compare this to Gamuda Bhd's offer that will instead guarantee equity returns in excess of 10 per cent per annum.
This offer was the attempt by the Selangor government, via its investment arm Kumpulan Darul Ehsan Bhd, to take over the restructuring of the water industry thereby fulfilling its promise to provide cheaper water to its electorate.
The state’s offer of RM9.2 billion was accepted by water concessionaires, Konsortium ABASS and Splash, but was rejected by Syabas and Puncak Niaga Sdn Bhd (PNSB).
ii. The Federal Government Bid
Done through its Water Asset Management Company (PAAB). It made an “informal” offer to acquire all assets from the water concessionaires amounting to RM10.3 billion in March 2010.However, the offer was rejected by water concessionaires, Abass and Splash, while both Syabas and Puncak Niaga Sdn Bhd (PNSB) have missed the April 6 deadline to repond.
“The deal by the Selangor state government is the best there is for the rakyat as we have affirmed no tariff increases for the foreseeable future. This can be achieved due to the lower proposed leasing cost by the state government from PAAB of approximately five per cent, compared to Gamuda’s cost of six per cent.
Pua added that further cost savings would be realised by “the lower cost of acquiring all assets of water concessionaires”, which was previously estimated at between RM9.2 billion and RM10.3 billion.
He added that the state government was not seeking to “maximise profits but instead maximise returns” to the public. Gamuda Bhd has confirmed their offer will guarantee equity returns in excess of 10 per cent per annum.
iii. Gamuda also made a revised offer yesterday to acquire all of the state’s water concessionaires through its associate, Splash, and this would cost the conglomerate RM10.75 billion. This is the best in terms of the valuation of the water concessionaires, being the highest offer on the table. They have promised to freeze water tariff increase in the first year and increase only between 2-3 per cent annually for subsequent years.
The Pahang-Selangor Water Transfer Project has already started a month back and yet we see a lack of will among politicians to resolve the problem of the restructuring of water concessionaires.
Who are we waiting for? Godot?
We must be a first world nation with a third world mentality.
Labels:
Perspectives
Malaysia: The Traffic Back-pedal
We have become a nation of back peddlers. Soon we may just have an international event called Tour d' Langkawi for Backpeddlers. Wouldn't that be fun?
This latest backpedal from the government definitely has something to do with the Hulu Selangor by-election. We should the voters in this constituency for helping us removed three measures that will possibly cause more dismay and apprehension among the poor. I am talking abut the exorbitant traffic fines and the increase in age to 17 before you can drive.
Let us read some excerpts from a news item filed at the Malaysia Insider online web-site today.
"A controversial increase in traffic fines has been withdrawn from amendments to the Road Transport Act 1987 today after it became a campaign issue in the Hulu Selangor by-election.
Minister in the PM's Deaprtment Nazri Abdul Aziz revealed that the government has withdrawn three amendments for further revisions after objections raised by its backbenchers. But the DAP has made it a campaign issue, saying raising fines from RM300 to RM1,000 would be a burden to the poor.
This is also the latest laws being taken off from Parliament with the first being the Good and Services Tax (GST) Bill on the eve of the current sitting.
“I had received a letter from the BNBBC through chairman Tiong King Sing, stating their objections to the amendments of the Act. I read its contents and have negotiated with the Dewan and also obtained confirmation from the Prime Minister and the Deputy,” Nazri said, referring to the Barisan Nasional Back Benchers Club (BNBBC).[My toes are laughing!]
“So we have decided to withdraw the amendments to the next session to be discussed along with the objections raised by the BNBBC,” he added, saying the Bill will be retabled in the next parliamentary session.
The three amendments which have been dropped are:
1. Compound fines for vehicles, originally priced at RM300, amended up to RM1000 has been withdrawn.
2. The minimum age for obtaining a vehicle licence, proposed to be raised be 17 years has been retracted, keeping it at the present 16 years old.
3. Amendments to allow only JPJ (Road Transport Department) to assign a registration number plate to any vehicle registered under the act have also been withdrawn."
I do not have to list the string of backpedals beginning with the withdrawal of English as the medium of instruction for Science and Maths.
This latest backpedal from the government definitely has something to do with the Hulu Selangor by-election. We should the voters in this constituency for helping us removed three measures that will possibly cause more dismay and apprehension among the poor. I am talking abut the exorbitant traffic fines and the increase in age to 17 before you can drive.
Let us read some excerpts from a news item filed at the Malaysia Insider online web-site today.
"A controversial increase in traffic fines has been withdrawn from amendments to the Road Transport Act 1987 today after it became a campaign issue in the Hulu Selangor by-election.
Minister in the PM's Deaprtment Nazri Abdul Aziz revealed that the government has withdrawn three amendments for further revisions after objections raised by its backbenchers. But the DAP has made it a campaign issue, saying raising fines from RM300 to RM1,000 would be a burden to the poor.
This is also the latest laws being taken off from Parliament with the first being the Good and Services Tax (GST) Bill on the eve of the current sitting.
“I had received a letter from the BNBBC through chairman Tiong King Sing, stating their objections to the amendments of the Act. I read its contents and have negotiated with the Dewan and also obtained confirmation from the Prime Minister and the Deputy,” Nazri said, referring to the Barisan Nasional Back Benchers Club (BNBBC).[My toes are laughing!]
“So we have decided to withdraw the amendments to the next session to be discussed along with the objections raised by the BNBBC,” he added, saying the Bill will be retabled in the next parliamentary session.
The three amendments which have been dropped are:
1. Compound fines for vehicles, originally priced at RM300, amended up to RM1000 has been withdrawn.
2. The minimum age for obtaining a vehicle licence, proposed to be raised be 17 years has been retracted, keeping it at the present 16 years old.
3. Amendments to allow only JPJ (Road Transport Department) to assign a registration number plate to any vehicle registered under the act have also been withdrawn."
I do not have to list the string of backpedals beginning with the withdrawal of English as the medium of instruction for Science and Maths.
Labels:
Perspectives
April 19, 2010
Australia’s central bank felt a coming boom in export earnings meant it could not delay a hike in interest rates earlier this month, leading investors to wager on a further rise by June at the latest.
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) felt a hike to 4.25 per cent, the fifth in six policy meetings, was needed because surging prices for iron ore and coal exports would boost the economy more than expected just a few months ago.
The hawkish tone to the minutes of its April meeting led some investors and analysts to bet it may raise rates yet again by another 25 basis points as early as May.
“A swift move to get back to normal levels seems almost certain,” said Bill Evans, the chief economist at Westpac.
“We think that the next move will be in either May or June, and on balance, the very clear emphasis on the resources boom tips the scales towards May.”
The market seemed to agree that further rate rises should come sooner rather than later. The Australian dollar rose to US$0.9275 (RM2.97) after the minutes, from US$0.9256 before.
Implied rates showed the chance of a move in May edged up to 28 per cent, from 25 per cent, while interbank futures implied a 64 per cent of a hike in June.
The minutes showed the RBA thought at the April meeting that rates were “a little below average”, and that the April move was a step in the process of returning them to “normal” levels.
“The prospective rise in the terms of trade was now likely to be noticeably stronger than had been expected was a factor suggesting that it might be prudent not to delay adjustment,” the minutes said.
Many private-sector economists believe the “average” or “normal” level of rates that the RBA refers to is between 4.5 and 5.0 per cent.
That seemed to be in line with what the RBA thinks. Governor Glenn Stevens said last month rates may rise to between 4.5 and 5.0 per cent.
Yet, with the domestic economy growing so strongly, some economists predict the RBA may lift rates to beyond 5.0 per cent this year to shift policy settings to a tightening mode.
“The bank will inevitably pause at some point, but the boost to income from the boom in the terms of trade will see the cash rate lifted to 5.25 per cent by the end of this year and 6.25 per cent by the end of next year,” said Felicity Emmett, an economist at RBS.
That is more hawkish than the market’s bets for rates to rise to 5.0 per cent in 12 months time .
A record mining boom
A healing world economy that is lifting factory production, as well as China’s insatiable demand for commodities, have helped Australian miners to win steep price hikes for iron ore and coal, the country’s two biggest exports.
Iron ore prices alone are set to rise 90 per cent or more this year, delivering extra export earnings worth perhaps two percentage points of Australia’s gross domestic product.
So big is the windfall that some analysts are calling it Australia’s biggest mining boom on record.
In line with that, analysts expect Australia’s terms of trade, or the amount earned from exports for every dollar spent on imports, to grow between 15 and 20 per cent over the next year.
That is far bigger than what the RBA anticipated in February, when it predicted growth of around 5 per cent or less.
Despite the trade surprise, the RBA stuck to its forecast for 2010 growth to come within trend levels, and for inflation to be at 2.5 per cent, right in the middle of its 2.0-3.0 target range. But some analysts reckon the RBA may soon have to raise its forecasts since the economy could well be growing above trend.
“It seems blindingly obvious that the Australian economy is already growing above trend - the unemployment rate falling for the past six months is as good an indicator of this as anything,” said Peter Jolly, an analyst at National Australia Bank who sees rates at 6.0 per cent by the end of 2011.
“Very soon they will need to shift their rhetoric and logic and start talking about taking interest rates to restrictive levels,” he said.
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) felt a hike to 4.25 per cent, the fifth in six policy meetings, was needed because surging prices for iron ore and coal exports would boost the economy more than expected just a few months ago.
The hawkish tone to the minutes of its April meeting led some investors and analysts to bet it may raise rates yet again by another 25 basis points as early as May.
“A swift move to get back to normal levels seems almost certain,” said Bill Evans, the chief economist at Westpac.
“We think that the next move will be in either May or June, and on balance, the very clear emphasis on the resources boom tips the scales towards May.”
The market seemed to agree that further rate rises should come sooner rather than later. The Australian dollar rose to US$0.9275 (RM2.97) after the minutes, from US$0.9256 before.
Implied rates showed the chance of a move in May edged up to 28 per cent, from 25 per cent, while interbank futures implied a 64 per cent of a hike in June.
The minutes showed the RBA thought at the April meeting that rates were “a little below average”, and that the April move was a step in the process of returning them to “normal” levels.
“The prospective rise in the terms of trade was now likely to be noticeably stronger than had been expected was a factor suggesting that it might be prudent not to delay adjustment,” the minutes said.
Many private-sector economists believe the “average” or “normal” level of rates that the RBA refers to is between 4.5 and 5.0 per cent.
That seemed to be in line with what the RBA thinks. Governor Glenn Stevens said last month rates may rise to between 4.5 and 5.0 per cent.
Yet, with the domestic economy growing so strongly, some economists predict the RBA may lift rates to beyond 5.0 per cent this year to shift policy settings to a tightening mode.
“The bank will inevitably pause at some point, but the boost to income from the boom in the terms of trade will see the cash rate lifted to 5.25 per cent by the end of this year and 6.25 per cent by the end of next year,” said Felicity Emmett, an economist at RBS.
That is more hawkish than the market’s bets for rates to rise to 5.0 per cent in 12 months time .
A record mining boom
A healing world economy that is lifting factory production, as well as China’s insatiable demand for commodities, have helped Australian miners to win steep price hikes for iron ore and coal, the country’s two biggest exports.
Iron ore prices alone are set to rise 90 per cent or more this year, delivering extra export earnings worth perhaps two percentage points of Australia’s gross domestic product.
So big is the windfall that some analysts are calling it Australia’s biggest mining boom on record.
In line with that, analysts expect Australia’s terms of trade, or the amount earned from exports for every dollar spent on imports, to grow between 15 and 20 per cent over the next year.
That is far bigger than what the RBA anticipated in February, when it predicted growth of around 5 per cent or less.
Despite the trade surprise, the RBA stuck to its forecast for 2010 growth to come within trend levels, and for inflation to be at 2.5 per cent, right in the middle of its 2.0-3.0 target range. But some analysts reckon the RBA may soon have to raise its forecasts since the economy could well be growing above trend.
“It seems blindingly obvious that the Australian economy is already growing above trend - the unemployment rate falling for the past six months is as good an indicator of this as anything,” said Peter Jolly, an analyst at National Australia Bank who sees rates at 6.0 per cent by the end of 2011.
“Very soon they will need to shift their rhetoric and logic and start talking about taking interest rates to restrictive levels,” he said.
Labels:
Economy
Hulu Selangor: Now Its Two for the Road
Well, as expected, the two independents chickened out and withdrew, leaving only the BN and the PR to sling it out.
Since nomination day, many things have happened. Some politicians got wounded on barbed wires and as the campaign started, Zaid got hit below the belt when focus was made of his drinking habit. This is anathema to Islam and BN wanted to capitalised on this big-time. The Election Commission have asked BN to take down such posters showing Zaid drinking alcohol.
On both sides, the big guns are coming and going. When Anwar left for Sibu, in came Hadi and now Guan Eng and Tok Guru Nik Aziz is on his way there too. On the BN side, Ibrahim Ali has made camp in Hulu Selangor with his Perkasa-leaning friends. PM Najib and the two independents that went with him to the US Parliamentary caucus will also be showing their faces in Hulu Selangor.
It looks like we are reaching the climax of the campaign period.
An interesting thing I read was there are yet to be posters of Kamalanathan in the Hulu Selangor constituency. Is something amiss here?
Since nomination day, many things have happened. Some politicians got wounded on barbed wires and as the campaign started, Zaid got hit below the belt when focus was made of his drinking habit. This is anathema to Islam and BN wanted to capitalised on this big-time. The Election Commission have asked BN to take down such posters showing Zaid drinking alcohol.
On both sides, the big guns are coming and going. When Anwar left for Sibu, in came Hadi and now Guan Eng and Tok Guru Nik Aziz is on his way there too. On the BN side, Ibrahim Ali has made camp in Hulu Selangor with his Perkasa-leaning friends. PM Najib and the two independents that went with him to the US Parliamentary caucus will also be showing their faces in Hulu Selangor.
It looks like we are reaching the climax of the campaign period.
An interesting thing I read was there are yet to be posters of Kamalanathan in the Hulu Selangor constituency. Is something amiss here?
Labels:
Perspectives
April 18, 2010
Malaysia: A Looming Debt Burden at the Bend
The World Bank issued its warning to Malaysia. A rising debt burden will cause possible damage to her economic growth potential unless it implements tough reforms and tackles its subsidy regimes.
Are the economic planners taking heed or this warning or are we still on that Cloud 9 euphoria of Malaysia Boleh?
In a Reuters report today (19th April), the World Bank has froecast in a report presented in Kuala Lumpur that Malaysia could grow by as much as 5.7 per cent this year but said that rate could fall back to as little as 4.2 per cent annually if reforms were not implemented.
PM Najib has pledged to restructure subsidies, introduce new taxes and tackle the country’s race-based system of economic preferences, but he continues to back-pedal i n the face of immediate political consideration; backing off some key tax and subsidy reforms recently.
“A stalling of the reform momentum would however cause an incremental loss in competitiveness, translating into slower growth of 4.2 per cent in the medium term and adding upward pressure on the government debt-to-GDP ratio,” the bank said.
Although Malaysia’s ability to finance its public sector deficit is not in doubt due to the country’s strong domestic bond market, the bank warned that government debt would continue to rise.
The World Bank’s baseline forecast shows that government debt will rise to close to 60 percent of gross domestic product, but warned that it could go higher without strong economic growth and the implementation of reforms such as cuts to subsidies and a new goods and services tax.
Subsidies cost Malaysia RM24.5 billion in 2009 out of total operating spending of RM160.2 billion.
Plans to cut subsidies on fuel have recently been deferred, causing investors to fret that Najib, whose government is politically weak, will not follow through on reforms.
“Malaysia’s competitive position in the global market place is expected to slip and growth could fall to levels averaging at 4.2 per cent over the projection horizon. As a result, the debt level would accelerate to close to 70 per cent of GDP in 2015,” the bank said.
Do we have the will and courage to save the economy?
Are the economic planners taking heed or this warning or are we still on that Cloud 9 euphoria of Malaysia Boleh?
In a Reuters report today (19th April), the World Bank has froecast in a report presented in Kuala Lumpur that Malaysia could grow by as much as 5.7 per cent this year but said that rate could fall back to as little as 4.2 per cent annually if reforms were not implemented.
PM Najib has pledged to restructure subsidies, introduce new taxes and tackle the country’s race-based system of economic preferences, but he continues to back-pedal i n the face of immediate political consideration; backing off some key tax and subsidy reforms recently.
“A stalling of the reform momentum would however cause an incremental loss in competitiveness, translating into slower growth of 4.2 per cent in the medium term and adding upward pressure on the government debt-to-GDP ratio,” the bank said.
Although Malaysia’s ability to finance its public sector deficit is not in doubt due to the country’s strong domestic bond market, the bank warned that government debt would continue to rise.
The World Bank’s baseline forecast shows that government debt will rise to close to 60 percent of gross domestic product, but warned that it could go higher without strong economic growth and the implementation of reforms such as cuts to subsidies and a new goods and services tax.
Subsidies cost Malaysia RM24.5 billion in 2009 out of total operating spending of RM160.2 billion.
Plans to cut subsidies on fuel have recently been deferred, causing investors to fret that Najib, whose government is politically weak, will not follow through on reforms.
“Malaysia’s competitive position in the global market place is expected to slip and growth could fall to levels averaging at 4.2 per cent over the projection horizon. As a result, the debt level would accelerate to close to 70 per cent of GDP in 2015,” the bank said.
Do we have the will and courage to save the economy?
Labels:
Economy
April 17, 2010
Hulu Selangor' s Four For the Road
Its nomination day Saturday for candidates planning to contest the April 25 Hulu Selangor by-election.
Nomination opened at 9am and closed at 10am with an hour for objections.
It is a four-corner fight pitting PKR's Zaid Ibrahim agaainst BN's Kalamanathan and 2 independents. One lady wannabe independent got shut out by the police and could not stand as a candidate so it seems.
There are 64,500 registered voters in Hulu Selangor, with 63,701 regular voters and 799 postal voters.Of the total, the Malays make up the majority with 34,020 voters or 52.7%.
The next largest group is the Chinese with 16,964 voters (26.3%) followed by the Indians at 12,453 voters or 19.3%.
This is going to be an interesting fight. A phone in poll by NTV7 tonight showed PKR is a shoo-in at over 90% of the responses.
Let me draw a scenario of the possible outcome.
The two independents have little to fight for without a manifesto and a machinery behind them. They are spoilers and are likely to lose their deposits.
Unless something untoward happens in the run-up to polling day, it looks like a weak BN will be responsible for its own defeat.
There are so many issues coming up or already is political fodder for the PKR to work on and for the voters to digest.
Let me list the potential bugbears for the BN.
1. New compromise candidate who is an unknown in town. Like PKR's Zaid, he is also a stranger in town.
2. The campaign period of 7 days is just too short for Kamalanathan to get the know the local voters
3.The Hulu Selangor area is too big to cover in a week
4.His last minute candidature reflects badly on the MIC. He will lose protest voters who will likely spoil their votes,do not appear on polling day or worse, vote for the opposition and independents
6. He is unlikely to get the support of the younger set of voters who are most likely anti-establishment.
7. He is unlikely to get Felda votes as the problems there have not been successfully resolved.
5.He will face the problems of national issues such as APCO,corruption,lack of transparency, the situation of the Interfaith panel, religious issues and the Teoh Beng Hock trial.
The things going for him will be
1. The postal voters possibly of the police stationed in the Police College in in Kuala Kubu Bahru.
2. A big chunk of the traditional pro-government Malay voters including government civil servants.
3. Some senior Chinese voters who will always be pro-government.
As for Zaid,there should not be many problems. The things going for him will be:
1. The largese of the Selangor State government in giving land titles. This will work well in Chinese dominated areas in new villages and in the township of Kuala Kubu Bharu. MCA with all its brand new 'gungho marketing' will not dent one bit the intent of voters to vote opposition.
2. Zaid is a national figure and has been perceived as upright and principled.
3. Zaid is a potential leader to lead the Pakatan Rakyat in case Anwar should be jailed.
4.The power of the alternative media, blogs, cellular phones, Face-book and Twitter.
Between BN and PKR, Kamalanathan is definitely the underdog. He claimed so himself today. Could he be pleading for sympathy votes? He is not only facing a difficult foe but more importantly, there is going to be sabotage against him both from disgruntled UMNO and MIC members. So, the candle is burnt for him at both end. He is in a hot place!
We will see what else develop till polling day.
Labels:
Perspectives
April 16, 2010
Axiata: Prolonging Debt
KUALA LUMPUR, April 16 — Axiata Group Bhd’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Axiata SPV1 (Labuan) Ltd, has proposed to issue senior unsecured US$300 million (RM958.5 million) 10-year fixed rate guaranteed notes.
Axiata, one of the largest Asian telecommunication companies focused on high growth low penetration emerging markets, will unconditionally and irrevocably guarantee the notes.
The issuance was part of ongoing efforts to improve the group’s capital management post demerger and would allow Axiata to have a longer debt maturity profile, the company said in a statement today.
“The net proceeds of the issue, which represents the first US dollar bond offering by a Malaysian corporate in 2010 to date, will be used for the purpose of refinancing the existing borrowings of Axiata’s subsidiary and for the general corporate purposes of the group,” it said.
It said the notes would not be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933 (as amended) and would be offered outside the United States in accordance with Regulation S under the Act.
“Applications have been made to list the notes on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Ltd and the Labuan International Financial Exchange,” Axiata said.
In the statement, Axiata President and Group Chief Executive Officer Datuk Seri Jamaludin Ibrahim said the exercise reinforced Axiata’s commitment to optimise the group’s capital structure.
“In a short space of time, Axiata has gone from deleveraging during the financial crisis to being rated investment grade, enabling us to tap into new sources of funding, namely the international debt capital markets, thus providing the group further financial agility for long-term growth.
“Furthermore, the exercise will enable Axiata to remain relevant and visible on the radar of investors,” he said.
Labels:
Stocks
April 15, 2010
Soros Warns the World!
This is an interesting report from Bloomberg.
Railway porter-turned-billionaire financier George Soros has delivered a stark warning that the financial world is on the wrong track and that we may be hurtling towards an even bigger boom and bust than in the credit crisis.
The man who "broke" the Bank of England (and who is still able to earn $US3.3 billion in a year) said the same strategy of borrowing and spending that had got us out of the Asian crisis could shunt us towards another crisis unless tough lessons are learnt.
Mr Soros, who worked as a porter to pay for his studies at the London School of Economics after emigrating from Hungary, warned that modern economics had got it wrong and that markets are not inherently stable.
“The success in bailing out the system on the previous occasion led to a superbubble, except that in 2008 we used the same methods,” he told a meeting hosted by The Economist in London on Tuesday night.
“Unless we learn the lessons, that markets are inherently unstable and that stability needs to the objective of public policy, we are facing a yet larger bubble.
“We have added to the leverage by replacing private credit with sovereign credit and increasing national debt by a significant amount."
Slow recovery
US Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke delivered his own warning on Wednesday, saying the pace of the US recovery would not be quick and that "significant" time would be needed to claw back jobs lost in the recession.
"If the pace of recovery is moderate, as I expect, a significant amount of time will be required to restore the 8½ million jobs that were lost [in the US] during the past two years," he told lawmakers.
The Fed chairman said data suggested demand would be enough to "promote a moderate economic recovery in coming quarters", as the US continues its tough slog out of recession.
He pointed to improved consumer spending - traditionally a strong driver of the US economy - as one factor aiding the recovery.
"Going forward, consumer spending should be aided by a gradual pick-up in jobs and earnings, the recovery in household wealth from recent lows, and some improvement in credit availability."
But he warned that the economy continued to face strong headwinds.
"I am particularly concerned about the fact that, in March, 44 per cent of the unemployed had been without a job for six months or more."
Echoing recent comments that the world's largest economy must act swiftly to curb its soaring budget deficits, Mr Bernanke took his tough message straight to Congress.
He warned lawmakers they faced "difficult choices" in cutting the country's deficit and that action could not be delayed.
"Addressing the country's fiscal problems will require difficult choices, but postponing them will only make them more difficult," he told them.
He warned "the poor fiscal condition of many state and local governments" remained a restraint on the pace of economic recovery.
Debt spiral
In his speech at the City of London's Haberdashers' Hall, Mr Soros also spoke out against the international community's efforts to help debt-laden Greece recover, London's Daily Telegraph reported.
The financier said the International Monetary Fund and the eurozone countries that are stepping in to lend money to Greece had proposed a rescue package that could still send the troubled nation into a debt spiral.
"It is a question of solvency," Mr Soros said.
"If you start charging very high rates as the market does in anticipation of solvency then that pushes you into insolvency."
He said the package, which was finalised on the weekend, should offer concessional interest rates, rather than the 5 per cent on offer from eurozone countries and 2.7 per cent from the IMF.
"While 5 per cent is better than what the market is willing to offer, a rescue package should offer concessional rates," he said.
"If they don't [reach their debt reduction target], they have then to tighten even further, then your tax receipts go down and the economy goes further into tanking and then you go into a debt spiral.
"That is the danger that is still remaining."
Mr Soros also called for the "oligopoly" formed by the four largest banks in the United States to be broken up.
He said he was supportive of the so-called Volcker rule, an American proposal to block banks from taking part in proprietary trading and owning hedge funds or private equity operations, Bloomberg reported.
Labels:
Economy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)