This is one interesting question: Will customers have to pay the RM50 service tax on principal credit cards or can it be absorbed by the banks that issue them?
Cardholders have been asking this question since the announcement of the service tax in the Budget last week. Banks are unable to give any as they await guidelines from Bank Negara.
The Association of Banks is expected to meet Bank Negara soon over the guidelines and to voice the concerns that have arisen from the RM50 service tax, which was first imposed in 1997 and abolished in 2001.
Meant to “promote prudent spending”, the tax – RM50 on each principal credit and charge card and RM25 for supplementary cards – has certainly riled millions of credit card users who on average, have two to three cards. Some have more than half a dozen, including co-brand cards between banks and retailers, airlines and hypermarkets.
Bank Negara’s Credit Counselling and Debt Management Agency (AKPK) believes that the measure will encourage individuals to use the few credit cards in their possession instead of signing up for many but not using them all. It will also discourage the use of cards as a source of easy credit and reduce credit card debt problems.
There are currently 9.8 million principal and 1.3 million supplementary credit cards issued at the moment, according to statistics from Bank Negara.Going by these figures, the Government stands to earn about RM555mil every year from the soon-to-be re-imposed tax.
As such, it is unlikely that banks will be able to absorb the service tax across the board and it would also defeat the purpose of getting customers to feel the pinch.
There are operational issues on the implementation of this 'unhappy' tax.
Will the card holder be taxed RM50 per principal card on Jan 1 or only when his card is up for annual fee payment or renewal, which may, for example, be in September?
If the cards are all issued by one bank, can the customer pay RM50 (per customer per bank) instead of per card per bank?
How much time will those who need to settle their credit card debt be given to clear the outstanding amount before canceling their card?
Whichever way you look at it, no government is going to allow an easy RM555 million slip through their fingers. Also, do not be gullible to expect 'money-grabbing' banks to absorb this hugh deluge of "indirect tax paying" for you!
As far as I can see it,start reviewing the cards in your wallets. If there are those that have to go, they will have to go. Do not wait for Godot.
Where are my scissors?
October 31, 2009
Credit Cards-Just Use the Scissors!
If credit card issuing banks, marketing agencies for credit cards and card holders expects the government to buckle and withdraw the RM50 tax soon, think thrice!
As early as yesterday,30 October, PM Najib affirmatively said there will be no immediate plans to revise the RM50 annual service tax on credit and charge cards.
Najib said it was too soon to talk about any revision as the matter was just recently announced in the 2010 Budget.
“Tunggulah dulu (We wait first). The Government also needs revenue. If we can’t hike up (the price of) anything, susah kita (it would be hard for us).
“Who is going to fund the nation’s development?”
Najib announced the proposal to impose a service tax of RM50 for each main credit and charge card, and RM25 on supplementary cards in his 2010 Budget.
If implemented, financial analysts predicted that at least 30% of the holders of 11 million cards in circulation who have more than one card will have to pay RM100 every year.
It was reported in The Star yesterday that applications for new credit cards dropped by 80% following the Government’s an-nouncement of the service tax starting next year.
For those having more than two cards,review the cards in your possession and cancel them.
Looking for the scissors is the best bet yet!
As early as yesterday,30 October, PM Najib affirmatively said there will be no immediate plans to revise the RM50 annual service tax on credit and charge cards.
Najib said it was too soon to talk about any revision as the matter was just recently announced in the 2010 Budget.
“Tunggulah dulu (We wait first). The Government also needs revenue. If we can’t hike up (the price of) anything, susah kita (it would be hard for us).
“Who is going to fund the nation’s development?”
Najib announced the proposal to impose a service tax of RM50 for each main credit and charge card, and RM25 on supplementary cards in his 2010 Budget.
If implemented, financial analysts predicted that at least 30% of the holders of 11 million cards in circulation who have more than one card will have to pay RM100 every year.
It was reported in The Star yesterday that applications for new credit cards dropped by 80% following the Government’s an-nouncement of the service tax starting next year.
For those having more than two cards,review the cards in your possession and cancel them.
Looking for the scissors is the best bet yet!
Labels:
Perspectives
China: A Bumpy Ride Ahead
This is certainly true-a gradual global economic recovery will help Chinese exports grow again. However, a statement from China’s Commerce Ministry said;"there are still many uncertainties and any recovery will be “hard and tortuous”.
Exports in September were 15.2 per cent below their level a year earlier, beating forecasts of a 21 per cent fall, though the government expects a double-digit fall for all of 2009.
In a statement released late yesterday on the ministry’s website, it said the full-year fall in exports compared with the previous year should be less than 20 per cent.
“In 2010, the world economy will hopefully see a gradual recovery, and the environment for Chinese trade will gradually improve,” it said.
“But as there is not yet sufficient strength in the global economic recovery, many problems and contradictions have yet to be resolved. The recovery will be hard and tortuous, and it will be hard to see an sustaining recovery in international demand in the short term.”
Net exports shaved 3.6 percentage points off GDP growth of 8.9 per cent in the third quarter as Chinese manufacturers continued to reel from a slump in global trade.
"Protectionism and increasing competition are main issues of concern", the ministry said.
“At present some nations are conducting probes into Chinese goods, which is causing yet further obstruction for a recovery in Chinese exports,” it said.
A US trade panel yesterday approved the eighth government investigation this year into charges of unfair Chinese pricing practices in a case in which US companies want a nearly 100 per cent duty or more on US$382 million (RM1.3 billion) of imported steel pipes.
Still, there were signs for optimism, the ministry added.
The government will conntinue to provide help to exporters in the form of export tax rebates, and numerous new markets awaited Chinese firms.
“There is a bright future for developing trade with newly emerging markets,” it said.
Exports in September were 15.2 per cent below their level a year earlier, beating forecasts of a 21 per cent fall, though the government expects a double-digit fall for all of 2009.
In a statement released late yesterday on the ministry’s website, it said the full-year fall in exports compared with the previous year should be less than 20 per cent.
“In 2010, the world economy will hopefully see a gradual recovery, and the environment for Chinese trade will gradually improve,” it said.
“But as there is not yet sufficient strength in the global economic recovery, many problems and contradictions have yet to be resolved. The recovery will be hard and tortuous, and it will be hard to see an sustaining recovery in international demand in the short term.”
Net exports shaved 3.6 percentage points off GDP growth of 8.9 per cent in the third quarter as Chinese manufacturers continued to reel from a slump in global trade.
"Protectionism and increasing competition are main issues of concern", the ministry said.
“At present some nations are conducting probes into Chinese goods, which is causing yet further obstruction for a recovery in Chinese exports,” it said.
A US trade panel yesterday approved the eighth government investigation this year into charges of unfair Chinese pricing practices in a case in which US companies want a nearly 100 per cent duty or more on US$382 million (RM1.3 billion) of imported steel pipes.
Still, there were signs for optimism, the ministry added.
The government will conntinue to provide help to exporters in the form of export tax rebates, and numerous new markets awaited Chinese firms.
“There is a bright future for developing trade with newly emerging markets,” it said.
Labels:
Economy
October 30, 2009
Credit Card Service Tax -Overkill!
Credit card agents cried foul over service charge plan.
This is the first concerted backlash against the 2010 Budget to impose RM50 service charge for principal credit card holders.
On 30 October, 5,000 credit card agents and 18 credit card issuers through a joint press conference,urged the government to withdraw the tax proposal effective on 1 January 2010.Some of the representatives from over 40 sales agencies holding up credit cards showed their displeasure as their rice bowls are on the line.
Francis Teow, who runs a credit card sales agency in Penang, said banks would not be keen to maintain their large sales force if they were not confident of achieving the desired sales target when the RM50 tax is enforced.
As for the Government’s argument that the RM50 was seen as a way to encourage prudent use of finances, Teow said a better alternative would be to raise the interest on the minimum monthly repayment from the current 5% to 20%.
“However, the Government is well aware there are many cardholders with substantial amount of outstanding balances in their credit cards.
“And if they increase the monthly minimum payment, many will default payment and non-performing loans will increase,” added Teow.
Credit card sales agency director H.K. Tan said the service tax would not only have a negative impact on sales agents but also on card holders as well.
“The newly imposed service tax will affect low and middle-class consumers.
“Many can’t settle their outstanding bills, imagine having to fork out another RM50 for service tax,” he said.
Credit card consultant Kevin Choong said it was not viable to burden the industry that had done much for consumers with the new tax.
“Credit cards have reduced the need to borrow from loan sharks. Imagine, people who do not have credit cards to avoid paying the RM50 service tax, they may need to carry a lot of cash and they will become easy target for thieves.
“Or, if in case of an accident in the middle of the night and you need to be admitted into the hospital, the credit card provides you with financial security,” he said.
I think PM Najib is again ill-advised on this tax move just like what happened in the case of the RM10 billion Amanah Saham1 Malaysia unit trust.
This is the first concerted backlash against the 2010 Budget to impose RM50 service charge for principal credit card holders.
On 30 October, 5,000 credit card agents and 18 credit card issuers through a joint press conference,urged the government to withdraw the tax proposal effective on 1 January 2010.Some of the representatives from over 40 sales agencies holding up credit cards showed their displeasure as their rice bowls are on the line.
Francis Teow, who runs a credit card sales agency in Penang, said banks would not be keen to maintain their large sales force if they were not confident of achieving the desired sales target when the RM50 tax is enforced.
As for the Government’s argument that the RM50 was seen as a way to encourage prudent use of finances, Teow said a better alternative would be to raise the interest on the minimum monthly repayment from the current 5% to 20%.
“However, the Government is well aware there are many cardholders with substantial amount of outstanding balances in their credit cards.
“And if they increase the monthly minimum payment, many will default payment and non-performing loans will increase,” added Teow.
Credit card sales agency director H.K. Tan said the service tax would not only have a negative impact on sales agents but also on card holders as well.
“The newly imposed service tax will affect low and middle-class consumers.
“Many can’t settle their outstanding bills, imagine having to fork out another RM50 for service tax,” he said.
Credit card consultant Kevin Choong said it was not viable to burden the industry that had done much for consumers with the new tax.
“Credit cards have reduced the need to borrow from loan sharks. Imagine, people who do not have credit cards to avoid paying the RM50 service tax, they may need to carry a lot of cash and they will become easy target for thieves.
“Or, if in case of an accident in the middle of the night and you need to be admitted into the hospital, the credit card provides you with financial security,” he said.
I think PM Najib is again ill-advised on this tax move just like what happened in the case of the RM10 billion Amanah Saham1 Malaysia unit trust.
Labels:
Perspectives
YTL-E Solutions: Looking for One
YTL E-solutions Berhad (YTE-E), a subsidiary of YTL, has been slapped a fine of RM1.9 million by the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (“MCMC”)because Y-Max Networks(YMN),YTE-E's subsidiary failed to roll-out a WiMax network programme to achieve 25% population coverage by 31 March 2009.
Some background.
YMN was awarded the right to the 2.3 GHz spectrum in March 2007. Under the terms of the award, YMN was required to submit a business plan to MCMC with a roll out programme to achieve 25% population coverage by 31 March 2009. Subsequently, YMN changed its business plan and decided to build a nationwide network instead of undertaking a piecemeal roll out. Under its revised business plan, YMN will exceed the targeted coverage prescribed by MCMC by next year. The revised business plan has been submitted to MCMC for approval.
An appeal has accordingly been made to MCMC to reconsider its decision in light of the revised business plan submitted by YMN. YMN is awaiting the response from MCMC to its appeal.
Do you think MCMC was right to call the bluff to provoke the YTL bosses to sit upright to seriously look into their obligations?
Labels:
Stocks
Genting Malaysia:The Wynn Caper
Genting Malaysia Berhad (GENM) is a potential 'naughty company'with a cash horde of close to RM5 billion. It will definitely do something with it for profit either actively or passively.
And so we see the first action being unleashed;though a passive one.
To beef up its burgeoning coffers, GenM through its wholly owned subsidiary, Resorts World Limited has subscribed to the First Mortgage Notes in Wynn,Las Vegas LLC and Wynn Las Vegas Capital Corporation. Based on an exchange rate of RM3.3675 : US$1.00, Resorts World Limited, has on 20 October 2009 completed the subscription to US$15 million (approximately RM50.51 million) nominal amount of these Notes.The total amount of First Mortgage Notes issued was US$500 million in aggregate principal amount at 7.875% returns due 2017.
The Notes, issued at a discount of 97.823% of par, were offered by Wynn as part of a private placement of US$500 million in aggregate principal amount of the Notes and the proceeds will be used by Wynn to part settle some of its outstanding debts and for general corporate purposes.
The Notes are secured by a first-priority lien on substantially all of the existing and future assets of the Issuers, and subject to the approval of the Nevada Gaming Commission. The Notes are senior secured obligations of the Issuers, guaranteed by certain of Wynn Las Vegas, LLC’s subsidiaries, which also guarantee Wynn’s other senior indebtedness; and equal in right of payment with, or senior to, all existing or future indebtedness of Wynn and each of its guarantors.
For GenM, investment in these Notes represent a good opportunity to expand its investment portfolio and to enhance returns on its existing cash balances. With yield returns in excess of 8%, the investment generates an attractive return compared to what is currently attainable in the money markets or in other secured investments regionally, especially within the GENM group's core leisure and hospitality industry. Further, the Notes are secured against quality gaming and entertainment assets in Las Vegas.
The subscription to the Notes is not expected to have a material impact on the net assets or earnings per share of the GENM group for the financial year ending 31 December 2009.
Wynn is one of the leading casino entertainment providers in the United States, owning and operating two properties located in Las Vegas, Nevada. Wynn also owns and operates Wynn Macau in the Macau Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. For the financial year ended 31 December 2008, Wynn group recorded net revenues of approximately US$3 billion.
On 9 October 2009, Wynn completed a successful Initial Public Offering for Wynn Macau on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, raising over US$1.87 billion in new equity.
The subscription to the Notes is prohibited under Paragraph 8.23 of the Listing Requirements ("LR") of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad ("Bursa Securities") and Paragraph 2.2 of Practice Note No. 11/2001 of the LR. Accordingly, the approval of Bursa Securities was sought and subsequently obtained on 13 October 2009 for GENM to subscribe to US$15 million nominal amount of the Notes, subject to the condition that GENM releases an announcement to Bursa Securities on the same.
So it looks like a passive inroad into the Wynn Casino Group has happened,opening possibilities for active participation of some Genting units into the casino activities in both Nevada and Macau.
For GenM shareholders, potential windfalls can be seen from fiscal year 2010 up to 2018 in terms of monetary returns.
Do they dare dream that GenM will strike out on other more active participation in the near future? For that we await Father Time to tell us all.
And so we see the first action being unleashed;though a passive one.
To beef up its burgeoning coffers, GenM through its wholly owned subsidiary, Resorts World Limited has subscribed to the First Mortgage Notes in Wynn,Las Vegas LLC and Wynn Las Vegas Capital Corporation. Based on an exchange rate of RM3.3675 : US$1.00, Resorts World Limited, has on 20 October 2009 completed the subscription to US$15 million (approximately RM50.51 million) nominal amount of these Notes.The total amount of First Mortgage Notes issued was US$500 million in aggregate principal amount at 7.875% returns due 2017.
The Notes, issued at a discount of 97.823% of par, were offered by Wynn as part of a private placement of US$500 million in aggregate principal amount of the Notes and the proceeds will be used by Wynn to part settle some of its outstanding debts and for general corporate purposes.
The Notes are secured by a first-priority lien on substantially all of the existing and future assets of the Issuers, and subject to the approval of the Nevada Gaming Commission. The Notes are senior secured obligations of the Issuers, guaranteed by certain of Wynn Las Vegas, LLC’s subsidiaries, which also guarantee Wynn’s other senior indebtedness; and equal in right of payment with, or senior to, all existing or future indebtedness of Wynn and each of its guarantors.
For GenM, investment in these Notes represent a good opportunity to expand its investment portfolio and to enhance returns on its existing cash balances. With yield returns in excess of 8%, the investment generates an attractive return compared to what is currently attainable in the money markets or in other secured investments regionally, especially within the GENM group's core leisure and hospitality industry. Further, the Notes are secured against quality gaming and entertainment assets in Las Vegas.
The subscription to the Notes is not expected to have a material impact on the net assets or earnings per share of the GENM group for the financial year ending 31 December 2009.
Wynn is one of the leading casino entertainment providers in the United States, owning and operating two properties located in Las Vegas, Nevada. Wynn also owns and operates Wynn Macau in the Macau Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. For the financial year ended 31 December 2008, Wynn group recorded net revenues of approximately US$3 billion.
On 9 October 2009, Wynn completed a successful Initial Public Offering for Wynn Macau on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, raising over US$1.87 billion in new equity.
The subscription to the Notes is prohibited under Paragraph 8.23 of the Listing Requirements ("LR") of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad ("Bursa Securities") and Paragraph 2.2 of Practice Note No. 11/2001 of the LR. Accordingly, the approval of Bursa Securities was sought and subsequently obtained on 13 October 2009 for GENM to subscribe to US$15 million nominal amount of the Notes, subject to the condition that GENM releases an announcement to Bursa Securities on the same.
So it looks like a passive inroad into the Wynn Casino Group has happened,opening possibilities for active participation of some Genting units into the casino activities in both Nevada and Macau.
For GenM shareholders, potential windfalls can be seen from fiscal year 2010 up to 2018 in terms of monetary returns.
Do they dare dream that GenM will strike out on other more active participation in the near future? For that we await Father Time to tell us all.
Labels:
Stocks
October 29, 2009
Street Walk Art-Shockingly Realistic!
The Amazing chalk art man is back.
This time he has created more fantastic art pieces on the sidewalk.
Look at these. It is a marvel that he can create such realistic three dimension street walk art.
What a genius!
This time he has created more fantastic art pieces on the sidewalk.
Look at these. It is a marvel that he can create such realistic three dimension street walk art.
What a genius!
Labels:
Perspectives
The US Economy: In Positive Territory
Reuters reported that the US economy grew in the third quarter for the first time in more than a year as government stimulus helped lift consumer spending and home building, fueling an unexpectedly strong advance.
Signaling the end of the worst recession in 70 years, the Commerce Department today said the economy expanded at a 3.5 per cent annual rate in the July-September period, snapping four down quarters with its fastest growth pace since the third quarter of 2007.
The report, which followed improving third-quarter corporate earnings, lifted stock markets around the world and the broad S&P 500 index of US stocks rose more than half a percentage point at the open. Prices for US government debt and the US dollar fell as traders switched out of safe havens and into riskier assets.
Growth was generally broad-based, with solid gains in consumer spending, exports and home construction. But it was also driven by government programs like the popular “cash for clunkers” incentive for new auto purchases and an US$8,000 (RM28,000) tax credit for first-time home buyers.
The auto discount program ended in August and the home tax credit is due to expire next month, although Congress is working on a plan to extend it.
Stripping out auto output, the economy would have expanded at only a 1.9 per cent rate in the third quarter.
“Better than expected GDP is confirming that the Great Recession has ended,” said Kevin Flanagan, fixed-income strategist for Global Wealth Management at Morgan Stanley in Purchase, New York. “The question going forward is, is this more of a statistical recovery or are we going to get some meaningful momentum on a sustained basis?”
Officials from the Federal Reserve — the US central bank — meet next Tuesday and Wednesday and will sift through the economic tea leaves to try to determine whether a sustainable recovery is building. They are widely expected, however, to keep stimulative monetary policies in place for some time.
Consumer spending, which normally accounts for more than two-thirds of US economic activity, surged at a 3.4 per cent rate in the third quarter, the fastest advance since the first quarter of 2007. Spending had fallen at a 0.9 per cent pace in the previous quarter.
Residential investment jumped at a 23.4 per cent rate, contributing to GDP for the first time since 2005, after declining 23.3 per cent in the April-June period. A housing slump had been the main factor behind the economy’s downturn.
A sharp moderation in the pace of inventory liquidation by businesses also supported recovery in the third quarter. Business inventories fell US$130.8 billion, slowing from the record US$160.2 billion plunge in the second quarter. The change added nearly 1 percentage point to the growth in GDP.
Analysts are hoping that the slowdown in the inventory decline by businesses will continue to support the economy in the fourth quarter, even as consumer spending is expected to retreat under the weight of the worst labour market in 26 years. With inventories at a lean level, any advance in consumer spending is more likely to lead to an increase in output.
Excluding inventories, GDP rose at a 2.5 per cent rate compared to a 0.7 per cent increase in the second quarter.
The weak dollar boosted exports, but a rise in imports subtracted from real GDP during the quarter. Federal government spending contributed to growth, but both state and local governments were a drag.
Business investment fell at a 2.5 per cent pace, with spending on non-residential structures dropping at a 9 per cent rate. A lack of credit has hit the US commercial property market hard.
A separate report from the Labour Department showed the number of US workers filing new claims for jobless benefits dipped by 1,000 last week to 530,000. Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast claims to fall to 521,000 from 531,000.
The number of people still on jobless aid after an initial week of benefits slid by 148,000 to 5.8 million in the week ended Oct 17. It was the lowest reading since March, hinting at some stability in the downtrodden job market.
This is good for global trade and stock markets.
Signaling the end of the worst recession in 70 years, the Commerce Department today said the economy expanded at a 3.5 per cent annual rate in the July-September period, snapping four down quarters with its fastest growth pace since the third quarter of 2007.
The report, which followed improving third-quarter corporate earnings, lifted stock markets around the world and the broad S&P 500 index of US stocks rose more than half a percentage point at the open. Prices for US government debt and the US dollar fell as traders switched out of safe havens and into riskier assets.
Growth was generally broad-based, with solid gains in consumer spending, exports and home construction. But it was also driven by government programs like the popular “cash for clunkers” incentive for new auto purchases and an US$8,000 (RM28,000) tax credit for first-time home buyers.
The auto discount program ended in August and the home tax credit is due to expire next month, although Congress is working on a plan to extend it.
Stripping out auto output, the economy would have expanded at only a 1.9 per cent rate in the third quarter.
“Better than expected GDP is confirming that the Great Recession has ended,” said Kevin Flanagan, fixed-income strategist for Global Wealth Management at Morgan Stanley in Purchase, New York. “The question going forward is, is this more of a statistical recovery or are we going to get some meaningful momentum on a sustained basis?”
Officials from the Federal Reserve — the US central bank — meet next Tuesday and Wednesday and will sift through the economic tea leaves to try to determine whether a sustainable recovery is building. They are widely expected, however, to keep stimulative monetary policies in place for some time.
Consumer spending, which normally accounts for more than two-thirds of US economic activity, surged at a 3.4 per cent rate in the third quarter, the fastest advance since the first quarter of 2007. Spending had fallen at a 0.9 per cent pace in the previous quarter.
Residential investment jumped at a 23.4 per cent rate, contributing to GDP for the first time since 2005, after declining 23.3 per cent in the April-June period. A housing slump had been the main factor behind the economy’s downturn.
A sharp moderation in the pace of inventory liquidation by businesses also supported recovery in the third quarter. Business inventories fell US$130.8 billion, slowing from the record US$160.2 billion plunge in the second quarter. The change added nearly 1 percentage point to the growth in GDP.
Analysts are hoping that the slowdown in the inventory decline by businesses will continue to support the economy in the fourth quarter, even as consumer spending is expected to retreat under the weight of the worst labour market in 26 years. With inventories at a lean level, any advance in consumer spending is more likely to lead to an increase in output.
Excluding inventories, GDP rose at a 2.5 per cent rate compared to a 0.7 per cent increase in the second quarter.
The weak dollar boosted exports, but a rise in imports subtracted from real GDP during the quarter. Federal government spending contributed to growth, but both state and local governments were a drag.
Business investment fell at a 2.5 per cent pace, with spending on non-residential structures dropping at a 9 per cent rate. A lack of credit has hit the US commercial property market hard.
A separate report from the Labour Department showed the number of US workers filing new claims for jobless benefits dipped by 1,000 last week to 530,000. Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast claims to fall to 521,000 from 531,000.
The number of people still on jobless aid after an initial week of benefits slid by 148,000 to 5.8 million in the week ended Oct 17. It was the lowest reading since March, hinting at some stability in the downtrodden job market.
This is good for global trade and stock markets.
Labels:
Economy
October 28, 2009
Cautious View from Bank Negara
At its meeting on 28 October, Bank Negara has decided to leaves the overnight policy rate (OPR) unchanged at 2%.
In a statement yesterday, Bank Negara said the outlook for the global economy continued to be uncertain, with recovery likely to be slow and uneven in view of the ongoing adjustments.
However, in the domestic economy, stronger evidence had emerged to suggest conditions were improving and a recovery in economic activity was gaining some strength, the central bank said.
“These improvements are more broad-based and are reflected in stronger labour market conditions, consumer and business sentiments, industrial production, financing activity and external trade.
“These positive developments are expected to continue into 2010, with growth in the domestic economy expected to continue to be supported by existing policy measures and the growing confidence in the private sector,” it said.
Bank Negara said with improving domestic economic conditions, and as price pressures and inflationary expectations expected to remain contained going forward, the assessment is that the current monetary policy stance was appropriate and would continue to provide support to economic activity.
Bank Negara said consumer prices declined at a slower rate in September. It said the decline in prices largely reflected the cumulative fall in fuel prices since June 2008 and the easing pressure on food prices.
“The decline in consumer prices, however, is expected to be temporary. Excluding further unanticipated price adjustments and external influences, inflation in 2010 is projected to be positive but remain subdued,” it added.
I guess the "feel good" sensations for the local economy are yet to be felt and caution rules the the minds of these central planners that savers' interests should still be sacrificed for the interest of business!
In a statement yesterday, Bank Negara said the outlook for the global economy continued to be uncertain, with recovery likely to be slow and uneven in view of the ongoing adjustments.
However, in the domestic economy, stronger evidence had emerged to suggest conditions were improving and a recovery in economic activity was gaining some strength, the central bank said.
“These improvements are more broad-based and are reflected in stronger labour market conditions, consumer and business sentiments, industrial production, financing activity and external trade.
“These positive developments are expected to continue into 2010, with growth in the domestic economy expected to continue to be supported by existing policy measures and the growing confidence in the private sector,” it said.
Bank Negara said with improving domestic economic conditions, and as price pressures and inflationary expectations expected to remain contained going forward, the assessment is that the current monetary policy stance was appropriate and would continue to provide support to economic activity.
Bank Negara said consumer prices declined at a slower rate in September. It said the decline in prices largely reflected the cumulative fall in fuel prices since June 2008 and the easing pressure on food prices.
“The decline in consumer prices, however, is expected to be temporary. Excluding further unanticipated price adjustments and external influences, inflation in 2010 is projected to be positive but remain subdued,” it added.
I guess the "feel good" sensations for the local economy are yet to be felt and caution rules the the minds of these central planners that savers' interests should still be sacrificed for the interest of business!
Labels:
Economy
Maxis the Marvel Returns!
Yes, this is the largest public offering in the history for Malaysia as far as an IPO is concerned.
Maxis Bhd’s initial public offering (IPO) will see the sale of 2.25 billion Maxis shares equivalent to 30 per cent of the company to new investors with an indicative offer price of RM5.20 per share.
“This is by far the largest public offering the country has ever seen,” said chief executive of CIMB Group, Datuk Nazir Razak, in a statement released during Maxis’ prospectus launch here today.
CIMB Investment Bank Bhd, Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse are joint global coordinators for the IPO.
Based on current time-lines, the pricing for the IPO is expected to be concluded by Nov 10 and Maxis is expected to be listed on the Main Market of Bursa Securities on Nov 19.
At listing, it is envisaged that Binariang GSM Sdn Bhd through Maxis Communications Bhd will effectively own 70 per cent of Maxis, the statement added.
Maxis Bhd’s initial public offering (IPO) will see the sale of 2.25 billion Maxis shares equivalent to 30 per cent of the company to new investors with an indicative offer price of RM5.20 per share.
“This is by far the largest public offering the country has ever seen,” said chief executive of CIMB Group, Datuk Nazir Razak, in a statement released during Maxis’ prospectus launch here today.
CIMB Investment Bank Bhd, Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse are joint global coordinators for the IPO.
Based on current time-lines, the pricing for the IPO is expected to be concluded by Nov 10 and Maxis is expected to be listed on the Main Market of Bursa Securities on Nov 19.
At listing, it is envisaged that Binariang GSM Sdn Bhd through Maxis Communications Bhd will effectively own 70 per cent of Maxis, the statement added.
Labels:
Stocks
What a Theory!
This is a very logical way of explaining intelligence!
I don't think you have ever heard the concept explained any better than this ... ....
'Well you see, it's like this .. . . A herd of buffalo can only move as fast as the slowest buffalo; and when the herd is hunted, it is the slowest and weakest ones at the back that are killed first.
This natural selection is good for the herd as a whole, because the general speed and health of the whole group keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members.
In much the same way, the human brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. Now, as we know, excessive intake of alcohol kills brain cells. But naturally, it attacks the slowest and weakest brain cells first.
In this way, regular consumption of beer eliminates the weaker brain cells, making the brain a faster and more efficient machine. And that is why you always feel smarter after a few beers...'
So bring out the chilled glasses ,won't you?
I don't think you have ever heard the concept explained any better than this ... ....
'Well you see, it's like this .. . . A herd of buffalo can only move as fast as the slowest buffalo; and when the herd is hunted, it is the slowest and weakest ones at the back that are killed first.
This natural selection is good for the herd as a whole, because the general speed and health of the whole group keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members.
In much the same way, the human brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. Now, as we know, excessive intake of alcohol kills brain cells. But naturally, it attacks the slowest and weakest brain cells first.
In this way, regular consumption of beer eliminates the weaker brain cells, making the brain a faster and more efficient machine. And that is why you always feel smarter after a few beers...'
So bring out the chilled glasses ,won't you?
Labels:
Perspectives
October 27, 2009
Best Definition of "Rape"
I think that this must be one of the few honest and best quotes of the decade.
Judge Judy to prostitute: "So when did you realize you were raped?"
Prostitute, wiping away tears: "When the check bounced."
Judge Judy to prostitute: "So when did you realize you were raped?"
Prostitute, wiping away tears: "When the check bounced."
Labels:
Perspectives
October 26, 2009
Petrol on Free Float?
Bernama reported that the Second Finance Minister, Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah did not discount the possibility that petrol price at the pump could follow the market price or without subsidy once the restructuring of petrol subsidization is implemented early 2010.
He said with the new structure, the offer of subsidy will be more targeted to the qualifying group or the holders of MyKad to enjoy the subsidized petrol price.
“The system is being developed and will be implemented between the first and second quarter,” he told reporters.
So what is the means test for subsidized petrol since this could differ from rural and urban areas?
He said with the new structure, the offer of subsidy will be more targeted to the qualifying group or the holders of MyKad to enjoy the subsidized petrol price.
“The system is being developed and will be implemented between the first and second quarter,” he told reporters.
So what is the means test for subsidized petrol since this could differ from rural and urban areas?
Labels:
Perspectives
Green-Shooting the US Economy
A Reuters report circa Oct 27 has reported regional economic reports suggesting the US economy has clambered back to levels associated with the end of recession, though recovery is expected to be patchy and may prove fleeting.
Economic activity and manufacturing data for the US Mid West and Texas hinted the impact of the global financial crisis is slowly abating as the economy emerges from the longest recession in 70 years.
However, an index of national economic activity slipped on a monthly basis and a Texas manufacturing output index fell.
"Those kind of reports tend to support the argument that this recovery will be more uneven and less V-shaped, but with the caveat that these are somewhat narrow regional surveys," said Kevin Flanagan, fixed-income strategist for global wealth management with Morgan Stanley in Purchase, New York.
The indices preceded gross domestic product results on Thursday, the broadest measure of economic health, likely to confirm widely-held views the United States returned to growth in the third quarter. The data is a key focus in markets.
"This week, the most important report is Thursday’s GDP release... which is expected to show one of the more robust readings we have seen in the last few years and will give rise to the notion statistically speaking that the Great Recession has ended," Flanagan said.
According to the median forecast of economists polled by Reuters, the US economy grew 3.3 per cent in the third quarter after shrinking 0.7 per cent in the second quarter.
Market participants will also be watching to see if the Federal Reserve changes its language on quantitative easing measures and future interest rate decisions in response to the shifting economic conditions at the central bank’s two day, Nov 3-4 policy-setting meeting next week.
Yesterday’s Chicago Federal Reserve report showed its three month moving average of economic activity has neared levels seen at the end of previous recessions.
The average, which smooths out monthly volatility, firmed to minus 0.63 in September from August’s revised figure of minus 0.96, previously reported at minus 1.09.
The Chicago Fed said in the past four recessions, the three-month average’s rise back above minus 0.70 has coincided closely with the end of the recession.
Yet other data showed the manufacturing rebound is patchy and uneven.
The Chicago Fed said its Midwest Manufacturing Index rose in September, as auto sector production rebounded.
However, vehicle making may decline as the effect of the government’s recently ended "cash-for-clunkers" buying incentive programme fades, some analysts expect.
The index rose to a seasonally adjusted 82.3 in September from a revised 81.6 in August. However, compared with a year earlier, Midwest output was down 15.7 per cent, steeper than the 7.2-per cent national decline.
The Dallas Federal Reserve’s Texas manufacturing output index fell to a reading of minus 8.0 in October from minus 0.5 in September.
Some more indications that the housing market may be temporarily forming a bottom are expected today, with the release of Case/Shiller home price data. However, economists worry that a tax incentive for first-time home buyers has been a major factor spurring sales and that its expiry next month may lead to a second leg down in housing’s more than three year decline.
The horizon do look better for the US in the 3rd Quarter. Hopefully, we should see better data in the 4th Quarter.
Economic activity and manufacturing data for the US Mid West and Texas hinted the impact of the global financial crisis is slowly abating as the economy emerges from the longest recession in 70 years.
However, an index of national economic activity slipped on a monthly basis and a Texas manufacturing output index fell.
"Those kind of reports tend to support the argument that this recovery will be more uneven and less V-shaped, but with the caveat that these are somewhat narrow regional surveys," said Kevin Flanagan, fixed-income strategist for global wealth management with Morgan Stanley in Purchase, New York.
The indices preceded gross domestic product results on Thursday, the broadest measure of economic health, likely to confirm widely-held views the United States returned to growth in the third quarter. The data is a key focus in markets.
"This week, the most important report is Thursday’s GDP release... which is expected to show one of the more robust readings we have seen in the last few years and will give rise to the notion statistically speaking that the Great Recession has ended," Flanagan said.
According to the median forecast of economists polled by Reuters, the US economy grew 3.3 per cent in the third quarter after shrinking 0.7 per cent in the second quarter.
Market participants will also be watching to see if the Federal Reserve changes its language on quantitative easing measures and future interest rate decisions in response to the shifting economic conditions at the central bank’s two day, Nov 3-4 policy-setting meeting next week.
Yesterday’s Chicago Federal Reserve report showed its three month moving average of economic activity has neared levels seen at the end of previous recessions.
The average, which smooths out monthly volatility, firmed to minus 0.63 in September from August’s revised figure of minus 0.96, previously reported at minus 1.09.
The Chicago Fed said in the past four recessions, the three-month average’s rise back above minus 0.70 has coincided closely with the end of the recession.
Yet other data showed the manufacturing rebound is patchy and uneven.
The Chicago Fed said its Midwest Manufacturing Index rose in September, as auto sector production rebounded.
However, vehicle making may decline as the effect of the government’s recently ended "cash-for-clunkers" buying incentive programme fades, some analysts expect.
The index rose to a seasonally adjusted 82.3 in September from a revised 81.6 in August. However, compared with a year earlier, Midwest output was down 15.7 per cent, steeper than the 7.2-per cent national decline.
The Dallas Federal Reserve’s Texas manufacturing output index fell to a reading of minus 8.0 in October from minus 0.5 in September.
Some more indications that the housing market may be temporarily forming a bottom are expected today, with the release of Case/Shiller home price data. However, economists worry that a tax incentive for first-time home buyers has been a major factor spurring sales and that its expiry next month may lead to a second leg down in housing’s more than three year decline.
The horizon do look better for the US in the 3rd Quarter. Hopefully, we should see better data in the 4th Quarter.
Labels:
Economy
Some Hit and Some Misses in the 2010 Budget
Business Times Singapore did a feature on Najib's 2010 budget. It encapsulates the shadow of an intended fiscal management feature within the budget bringing chiefly revenue from two additional sources. These are: the return of the real property gains tax and a new tax on credit card holders. If administered properly,it will help to quell a potential property bubble from occurring as well as check credit card abuse.
Let us read the report. I have paraphrased where necessary for brevity.
" The main thrust of Malaysian Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s maiden Budget last Friday appears to contain the fiscal deficit.
Courageous cuts were made in both operating and development spending. Najib, currently also Finance minister, cut operating expenditure by almost 14 per cent and development expenditure by over 4 per cent. The cuts will bring the deficit down from 7.4 per cent of GDP this year to 5.6 per cent in 2010.
Taking cognizance that the prospects for global economic recovery are still uncertain, it is only prudent that Malaysia slows down the pace of its pump priming. The budget envisaged that private sector will take up the slack of the reduced government spending by export expansion— at least 3-4 per cent in 2010. Private consumption is also expected to be almost 5 per cent more.
Malaysia estimates real GDP growth for 2010 to come in at 2-3 per cent. If the government is serious on hewing off further fat from its operating expenditure,it can administer transparency and accountability modes in tenders and contracts.
An unconventional feature of the 2010 Budget is the proposal that people residing and working in the Iskandar region in Johor be taxed only at a flat rate of 15 per cent. This is apparently design to kick start the region’s development. But in the Malaysian context, such a low tax rate could create problems. Najib’s proposed cut is a whopping 11 percentage points off Malaysia’s current minimum income tax rate of 26 per cent and could entice a lot of less-than-bona-fide companies and individuals to the area.Administering two separate tax zones in a single country is a difficult proposition and enforcement could be tricky. This is not the same thing as a free trade zone or a duty free area, which the Income Tax Board has long experience in dealing with.[That is an area where MACC should start looking from now onwards.]
The Budget also proposed the restoration of the real property gains tax at a flat 5 per cent on all such assets, irrespective of the tenure of holding. This appears to be a rollback of a liberalisation by former prime minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in 2007 — although Tun Abdullah had only suspended the tax rather than abolish it.
Originally the tax was 30 per cent of the disposal gain if the seller had kept the asset for less than six years. Thereafter, the tax got progressively less until it reached zero, depending on the tenure. In short, it was to deter land and property speculation. On the other hand, sadly PM Najib’s proposal would appear to penalise those who were never speculators.
Finally, Najib proposed a RM50 charge on each credit and charge card and a RM25 fee for each supplementary card. The rationale is to curb the aggressive growth of credit card debt. Malaysia, with an estimated working population of about 14 million, has a staggering 11 million cards in circulation. Najib may be right to assume that that is several million too many. [However, many an individual holds more than one card.As such, many will be returning all their unnecessary cards, so bank incomes will take in dip in this aspect.]
[Curtailing expenditure using credit card may also work against the current government efforts to promote consumption that drives the recovery of the economy.]
Let us read the report. I have paraphrased where necessary for brevity.
" The main thrust of Malaysian Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s maiden Budget last Friday appears to contain the fiscal deficit.
Courageous cuts were made in both operating and development spending. Najib, currently also Finance minister, cut operating expenditure by almost 14 per cent and development expenditure by over 4 per cent. The cuts will bring the deficit down from 7.4 per cent of GDP this year to 5.6 per cent in 2010.
Taking cognizance that the prospects for global economic recovery are still uncertain, it is only prudent that Malaysia slows down the pace of its pump priming. The budget envisaged that private sector will take up the slack of the reduced government spending by export expansion— at least 3-4 per cent in 2010. Private consumption is also expected to be almost 5 per cent more.
Malaysia estimates real GDP growth for 2010 to come in at 2-3 per cent. If the government is serious on hewing off further fat from its operating expenditure,it can administer transparency and accountability modes in tenders and contracts.
An unconventional feature of the 2010 Budget is the proposal that people residing and working in the Iskandar region in Johor be taxed only at a flat rate of 15 per cent. This is apparently design to kick start the region’s development. But in the Malaysian context, such a low tax rate could create problems. Najib’s proposed cut is a whopping 11 percentage points off Malaysia’s current minimum income tax rate of 26 per cent and could entice a lot of less-than-bona-fide companies and individuals to the area.Administering two separate tax zones in a single country is a difficult proposition and enforcement could be tricky. This is not the same thing as a free trade zone or a duty free area, which the Income Tax Board has long experience in dealing with.[That is an area where MACC should start looking from now onwards.]
The Budget also proposed the restoration of the real property gains tax at a flat 5 per cent on all such assets, irrespective of the tenure of holding. This appears to be a rollback of a liberalisation by former prime minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in 2007 — although Tun Abdullah had only suspended the tax rather than abolish it.
Originally the tax was 30 per cent of the disposal gain if the seller had kept the asset for less than six years. Thereafter, the tax got progressively less until it reached zero, depending on the tenure. In short, it was to deter land and property speculation. On the other hand, sadly PM Najib’s proposal would appear to penalise those who were never speculators.
Finally, Najib proposed a RM50 charge on each credit and charge card and a RM25 fee for each supplementary card. The rationale is to curb the aggressive growth of credit card debt. Malaysia, with an estimated working population of about 14 million, has a staggering 11 million cards in circulation. Najib may be right to assume that that is several million too many. [However, many an individual holds more than one card.As such, many will be returning all their unnecessary cards, so bank incomes will take in dip in this aspect.]
[Curtailing expenditure using credit card may also work against the current government efforts to promote consumption that drives the recovery of the economy.]
Labels:
Economy
A Decapitating Move!
Who would believe Budget 2008 could have such adverse effects on most of us?
Us-here means those who are holders of numerous credit cards.
Over the years, we have been accumulating these credit cards particularly Platinum Credit cards. We were quietly happy that our credit rating has improved and that we can quickly access a lot of cash even though at a higher cost. No need to go to the bank, filling out forms and getting guarantors.
However, PM Najib as Finance Minister has put paid to our financial comfort zone. For every principal card, a government tax of RM50 will be automatically levied from January 2010. Supplementary card holder will pay RM25.For many who depend on credit cards for cash flow,PM Najib has indeed wounded the golden goose.
I know of many small businessmen that thrives of credit card loans to offset cash flow problems. I guess they can still keep the cards if they want to but pay unnecessary taxes for it now.
For many banks intending to go on aggressive roadshows to promote credit cards,it has rung the death knell as well. Once someone has a credit card, he may want to upgrade. But if he is already a Platinum card holder,it will be downright difficult to ensnare him to carry an additional card.No one wants to pay the government.Why should they?
I expect many to cancel their cards posthaste before January 2010. Just today, I went to two banks to cancel three of my cards. I will be canceling more cards in the days to come. Finally, I guess I will only end up with about four to five cards which are 'relevant' to me.
Anyway,there is a silver lining for me in all this. My so-called assumed 'indebtedness' on record at Bank Negara will now slowly evaporate.....
Labels:
Perspectives
But Just Who are You Kidding?
Tan Sri Amrin Buang, The Auditor-General
The Head Honcho of the Malaysian Public Services Department (JPA)says all ministry secretaries-general and directors-general will be made accountable for the abuses, negligence, mismanagement and excesses conducted by and within their respective ministries and departments. What a joke!
Who is he kidding?
We all know finger pointing will commence and the most junior officers down the pecking order will be made to pay after a laborious witch-hunt. I do not believe the rakyat's money will ever be recovered. It will just be a rap on the knuckles and the 'big buffons' will once again escaped this "wool over the eyes" dragnet.
Director-General of Public Services Tan Sri Ismail Adam said all those implicated in the 2008 Auditor-General’s Report will be penalised.
Let us look at some of the excesses mentioned in the 2008 Auditor-General's Report quoted by Ismail.
"For example, if the actual cost of the item is only RM1 but the ministry paid RM600 for it, then the individual who approved it will have to repay the ministry or Treasury RM599." Since most are officer recommendations and committee approvals by representatives from even the Treasury itself sitting on these interdepartmental approving committees, how is blame going to be equitably apportioned?
Fancy this.
Among the observations of this year’s A-G’s report which raised eyebrows is Kolej Kemahiran Tinggi Mara Balik Pulau’s purchase of two laptops for RM42,320 each, when the market price is only between RM5,350 and RM6,500.
Ismail said that at times it may be hard to put the blame of questionable purchases on one individual who may claim he was only following orders.
"But if we have enough evidence, he will have to pay back the money as he put the ministry or department at a financial disadvantage," he said. [Another interesting loophole has been identified.]
He said the repayment could be deducted from their salaries or from their gratuity or even pension.
Ismail said that since 2008, the A-G’s report had become part of the criterion of Key Performance Index (KPI) for all 38 secretaries-general and their directors-general.
"If their ministry or department is mentioned unfavourably in the A-G’s report, then it will affect their overall performance score of the KSU (secretaries-general) or D-G and can affect promotions and increments," he said.
"Even if the mistake is done by the despatch boy, as the heads (of the ministry or department), the buck stops with them and they must be held accountable."
He said such actions were taken against several officials last year following the 2007 A-G’s report, where they ended up being "pulled" or in layman’s terms "cold-storaged" or passed over for promotion.
Ismail, however, declined to pinpoint the individuals, saying it was sufficient that those in the service knew who they were.
"But the public must also know that we are not sitting idly by when reports of mismanagement of public money are exposed," he said, adding that just like last year, anti-corruption investigators will be brought in to probe all ministries and departments implicated in the 2008 A-G’s report.
He also said none of them had been or would be transferred as has been the public perception.
"We keep them there and rehabilitate them if we can, otherwise you are only transplanting the problem," he said.
The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) said in a statement that, as a matter of course, they go through the A-G’s report thoroughly to identify elements of corruption, misappropriation or abuse of power in the management of public funds, and appropriate action is taken against those responsible.
MACC, why are we always waiting?
The Head Honcho of the Malaysian Public Services Department (JPA)says all ministry secretaries-general and directors-general will be made accountable for the abuses, negligence, mismanagement and excesses conducted by and within their respective ministries and departments. What a joke!
Who is he kidding?
We all know finger pointing will commence and the most junior officers down the pecking order will be made to pay after a laborious witch-hunt. I do not believe the rakyat's money will ever be recovered. It will just be a rap on the knuckles and the 'big buffons' will once again escaped this "wool over the eyes" dragnet.
Director-General of Public Services Tan Sri Ismail Adam said all those implicated in the 2008 Auditor-General’s Report will be penalised.
Let us look at some of the excesses mentioned in the 2008 Auditor-General's Report quoted by Ismail.
"For example, if the actual cost of the item is only RM1 but the ministry paid RM600 for it, then the individual who approved it will have to repay the ministry or Treasury RM599." Since most are officer recommendations and committee approvals by representatives from even the Treasury itself sitting on these interdepartmental approving committees, how is blame going to be equitably apportioned?
Fancy this.
Among the observations of this year’s A-G’s report which raised eyebrows is Kolej Kemahiran Tinggi Mara Balik Pulau’s purchase of two laptops for RM42,320 each, when the market price is only between RM5,350 and RM6,500.
Ismail said that at times it may be hard to put the blame of questionable purchases on one individual who may claim he was only following orders.
"But if we have enough evidence, he will have to pay back the money as he put the ministry or department at a financial disadvantage," he said. [Another interesting loophole has been identified.]
He said the repayment could be deducted from their salaries or from their gratuity or even pension.
Ismail said that since 2008, the A-G’s report had become part of the criterion of Key Performance Index (KPI) for all 38 secretaries-general and their directors-general.
"If their ministry or department is mentioned unfavourably in the A-G’s report, then it will affect their overall performance score of the KSU (secretaries-general) or D-G and can affect promotions and increments," he said.
"Even if the mistake is done by the despatch boy, as the heads (of the ministry or department), the buck stops with them and they must be held accountable."
He said such actions were taken against several officials last year following the 2007 A-G’s report, where they ended up being "pulled" or in layman’s terms "cold-storaged" or passed over for promotion.
Ismail, however, declined to pinpoint the individuals, saying it was sufficient that those in the service knew who they were.
"But the public must also know that we are not sitting idly by when reports of mismanagement of public money are exposed," he said, adding that just like last year, anti-corruption investigators will be brought in to probe all ministries and departments implicated in the 2008 A-G’s report.
He also said none of them had been or would be transferred as has been the public perception.
"We keep them there and rehabilitate them if we can, otherwise you are only transplanting the problem," he said.
The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) said in a statement that, as a matter of course, they go through the A-G’s report thoroughly to identify elements of corruption, misappropriation or abuse of power in the management of public funds, and appropriate action is taken against those responsible.
MACC, why are we always waiting?
Labels:
Perspectives
Woman of Tomorrow-Short, Fat and Pregnant too?
This is just not good at all for beauty pageant organizers,film casting personnel and fashion houses!
According to a world leading university,the future woman will not have the shapes of Cindy Crawford, Eva Longoria or Heidi Klum.
So, what will the woman of the future be like?
Scientists predict that she will be shorter, fatter and have babies earlier.
Yale University researchers have traced the effects of natural selection among two generations of women and predict that their descendents will be slightly shorter and chubbier.
They will also have lower cholesterol and blood pressure and have their first child earlier in life.
The results show the medical value of evolutionary biology principles, 150 years after Darwin published The Origin of the Species.
Are you crying?
According to a world leading university,the future woman will not have the shapes of Cindy Crawford, Eva Longoria or Heidi Klum.
So, what will the woman of the future be like?
Scientists predict that she will be shorter, fatter and have babies earlier.
Yale University researchers have traced the effects of natural selection among two generations of women and predict that their descendents will be slightly shorter and chubbier.
They will also have lower cholesterol and blood pressure and have their first child earlier in life.
The results show the medical value of evolutionary biology principles, 150 years after Darwin published The Origin of the Species.
Are you crying?
Labels:
Perspectives
October 25, 2009
Now see Eva Longoria in the buff!
So, what do you know?
Eva Longoria has taken one step further to better Eva Mendes.
In the latest fashion campaign for magazine, London Fog, she went on the offensive to be in the buff,baring almost everything, together with her San Antonio Spurs basketball star husband, Tony Parker.
It must be eye-popping good to be able to see this sexy Latino siren exposed.
I am sure you would agree especially for those who have been teased to death almost every week by cheeky Eva in Desperate Housewives.
Has anyone seen the pics?
Eva Longoria has taken one step further to better Eva Mendes.
In the latest fashion campaign for magazine, London Fog, she went on the offensive to be in the buff,baring almost everything, together with her San Antonio Spurs basketball star husband, Tony Parker.
It must be eye-popping good to be able to see this sexy Latino siren exposed.
I am sure you would agree especially for those who have been teased to death almost every week by cheeky Eva in Desperate Housewives.
Has anyone seen the pics?
Labels:
Perspectives
Fait Accompli?
It is certainly believable. Things corporations do as well as those that do predictions on corporate results. Are they hand in glove?
Let us look at the current scenario.
More than 80 percent of major companies reporting third-quarter results this month have beaten Wall Street expectations. So is business that good? No. Are companies gaming the system? Yes.
Corporate America has a habit of low-balling the earnings forecasts used by analysts to determine their estimates. That way, the bar is lower, and companies can easily jump over when the quarter's results are announced — even if profits and revenues have fallen off a cliff.
"Over the last decade, there's been a distinctive tendency for companies to underpromise and overdeliver," says Dirk van Dijk, chief equity strategist of Zacks Investment Research. "Lately companies are being even more cautious. They realize investors can very harshly punish any company that disappoints."
Beating expectations generally gives share prices a quick lift, but the news can mislead investors about the real state of the business — and just how far this economic recovery has to go. In fact, of the companies reporting third-quarter results so far, 60 percent have posted lower net income compared with a year ago.
Still, the recession has, if anything, accelerated the flow of positive earnings "surprises" as companies play it safe and issue more conservative earnings forecasts. Over the past two years, 65 percent of earnings reports have beaten estimates. Even after last fall's financial crisis, the following two quarters produced nearly twice as many beats as misses.
And this quarter, 81 percent of the first 199 companies listed on the Standard & Poor's 500 index that reported earnings came in above expectations.
The expectations game works like this.
Corporation X announces weeks or months ahead of time that it expects to earn, say, 55 to 60 cents per share. Analysts look at various measures of the company's financial and operating performance while compiling forecasts, but rely heavily on guidance from management. The resulting consensus forecast might be around 57 cents a share.
Let us look at the current scenario.
More than 80 percent of major companies reporting third-quarter results this month have beaten Wall Street expectations. So is business that good? No. Are companies gaming the system? Yes.
Corporate America has a habit of low-balling the earnings forecasts used by analysts to determine their estimates. That way, the bar is lower, and companies can easily jump over when the quarter's results are announced — even if profits and revenues have fallen off a cliff.
"Over the last decade, there's been a distinctive tendency for companies to underpromise and overdeliver," says Dirk van Dijk, chief equity strategist of Zacks Investment Research. "Lately companies are being even more cautious. They realize investors can very harshly punish any company that disappoints."
Beating expectations generally gives share prices a quick lift, but the news can mislead investors about the real state of the business — and just how far this economic recovery has to go. In fact, of the companies reporting third-quarter results so far, 60 percent have posted lower net income compared with a year ago.
Still, the recession has, if anything, accelerated the flow of positive earnings "surprises" as companies play it safe and issue more conservative earnings forecasts. Over the past two years, 65 percent of earnings reports have beaten estimates. Even after last fall's financial crisis, the following two quarters produced nearly twice as many beats as misses.
And this quarter, 81 percent of the first 199 companies listed on the Standard & Poor's 500 index that reported earnings came in above expectations.
The expectations game works like this.
Corporation X announces weeks or months ahead of time that it expects to earn, say, 55 to 60 cents per share. Analysts look at various measures of the company's financial and operating performance while compiling forecasts, but rely heavily on guidance from management. The resulting consensus forecast might be around 57 cents a share.
Labels:
Perspectives
October 24, 2009
Portrait of the First Family
This is the first Afro-African First Family of the USA. Barrack Obama made history by winning the American Presidential Elections last year and assume power on 20 January 2008.
Labels:
Perspectives
October 22, 2009
Insufficient Punishment for the Crime
This story by Eugene Robinson about the Obama action on Wall street is an interesting one. There is no punishment for the crime only denying them desserts after the main meal.
Friday, October 23, 2009
Read his piece.
Slashing executive salaries, bonuses and perks at the seven bailed-out companies that gorged most gluttonously at the public trough is emotionally satisfying, but it shouldn't be. It's like arresting jaywalkers while ignoring the bank robbery that's happening in broad daylight down the block.
Don't get me wrong. The Obama administration's "pay czar," Kenneth Feinberg, is right to put a lid on compensation at the Not-So-Magnificent Seven: Citigroup, Bank of America, General Motors, Chrysler, GMAC, Chrysler Financial and the unforgettable AIG. Twenty-five of the biggest earners at each of those firms will have their overall compensation cut roughly in half, and most of that will come as restricted company stock, not cash. This means that what they ultimately reap, when they are eventually allowed to sell the stock, will depend on how well the company performs -- which will depend on how well the executives do their jobs.
Tying pay to performance: What a concept.
Feinberg even muscled outgoing Bank of America chief executive Kenneth Lewis into accepting no pay or bonus for this year. But Lewis will still have an estimated $70 million retirement package to keep him warm at night, so hold your tears.
It's nice to know that there must be some pooh-bah at B of A, Citigroup or AIG who will have to live without the new $90,000 Porsche Panamera he was planning to buy. But Feinberg's writ of imperial decree doesn't extend beyond those seven companies, and the rest of Wall Street gives no indication of remotely understanding what the big deal is about compensation. Goldman Sachs, for example, has a bonus pool this year of at least $16 billion and perhaps as much as $23 billion.
But all this is just a sideshow. The main event is the limited, far-too-modest attempt by the Obama administration and Congress to curb the irresponsible Wall Street practices that led to the financial meltdown -- and, if unaddressed, will lead inexorably to the next crisis.
Deregulation allowed the financial marketplace to devolve from an institution that served the overall economy -- by allocating capital most efficiently to the companies that could put it to best use -- into an institution whose primary mission was to serve itself.
The vast over-the-counter trade in instruments known as derivatives, nominally worth a staggering $600 trillion worldwide, is largely an exercise in make-believe. Firms make highly leveraged investments in exotic securities whose true value is opaque. Then they hedge these investments by buying insurance against potential losses, although the insurer doesn't have a fraction of the money it would need to make good on all its promises.
All this investing and hedging generate huge transaction fees and big profits, which can be skimmed off the top each year. Everything's fine, until there's some disruption in the real economy -- a downturn in the housing market, say. If the disruption is severe enough, the web of make-believe deals starts to unravel. At which point the government steps in and bails everybody out.
The White House and Treasury Department have proposed reforms that would ameliorate, but not eliminate, this ridiculous cycle. What the administration won't do is outlaw some kinds of derivative products or transactions; officials say that if they went down that road, they would always be one step behind Wall Street's inventiveness and greed. I think it would be worth a try.
The administration did propose that derivatives transactions go through clearinghouses and be conducted on transparent, regulated exchanges. But as reform legislation begins to work its way through Congress, Wall Street firms -- including companies that received bailout funds -- have boosted their spending on lobbying and political donations.
As a result, legislation approved Wednesday by the House Agriculture Committee -- which has jurisdiction over the futures markets -- would exempt up to 30 percent of derivatives transactions from new regulations. A bill approved Thursday by the House Financial Services Committee that would create a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, strongly opposed by most luminaries on Wall Street, was amended in the committee to exclude mortgage insurers, title insurers, accountants, lawyers and others.
Banks, meanwhile, are jacking up overdraft charges and instituting new kinds of credit card fees before any new limits kick in. Hey, get it while you can.
Capping salaries and bonuses is fine. But we need to pay attention to the guys in ski masks with bulging bags of money slung over their shoulders. They're about to jump into the getaway car.
So has Obama got all the wrong guys?
Friday, October 23, 2009
Read his piece.
Slashing executive salaries, bonuses and perks at the seven bailed-out companies that gorged most gluttonously at the public trough is emotionally satisfying, but it shouldn't be. It's like arresting jaywalkers while ignoring the bank robbery that's happening in broad daylight down the block.
Don't get me wrong. The Obama administration's "pay czar," Kenneth Feinberg, is right to put a lid on compensation at the Not-So-Magnificent Seven: Citigroup, Bank of America, General Motors, Chrysler, GMAC, Chrysler Financial and the unforgettable AIG. Twenty-five of the biggest earners at each of those firms will have their overall compensation cut roughly in half, and most of that will come as restricted company stock, not cash. This means that what they ultimately reap, when they are eventually allowed to sell the stock, will depend on how well the company performs -- which will depend on how well the executives do their jobs.
Tying pay to performance: What a concept.
Feinberg even muscled outgoing Bank of America chief executive Kenneth Lewis into accepting no pay or bonus for this year. But Lewis will still have an estimated $70 million retirement package to keep him warm at night, so hold your tears.
It's nice to know that there must be some pooh-bah at B of A, Citigroup or AIG who will have to live without the new $90,000 Porsche Panamera he was planning to buy. But Feinberg's writ of imperial decree doesn't extend beyond those seven companies, and the rest of Wall Street gives no indication of remotely understanding what the big deal is about compensation. Goldman Sachs, for example, has a bonus pool this year of at least $16 billion and perhaps as much as $23 billion.
But all this is just a sideshow. The main event is the limited, far-too-modest attempt by the Obama administration and Congress to curb the irresponsible Wall Street practices that led to the financial meltdown -- and, if unaddressed, will lead inexorably to the next crisis.
Deregulation allowed the financial marketplace to devolve from an institution that served the overall economy -- by allocating capital most efficiently to the companies that could put it to best use -- into an institution whose primary mission was to serve itself.
The vast over-the-counter trade in instruments known as derivatives, nominally worth a staggering $600 trillion worldwide, is largely an exercise in make-believe. Firms make highly leveraged investments in exotic securities whose true value is opaque. Then they hedge these investments by buying insurance against potential losses, although the insurer doesn't have a fraction of the money it would need to make good on all its promises.
All this investing and hedging generate huge transaction fees and big profits, which can be skimmed off the top each year. Everything's fine, until there's some disruption in the real economy -- a downturn in the housing market, say. If the disruption is severe enough, the web of make-believe deals starts to unravel. At which point the government steps in and bails everybody out.
The White House and Treasury Department have proposed reforms that would ameliorate, but not eliminate, this ridiculous cycle. What the administration won't do is outlaw some kinds of derivative products or transactions; officials say that if they went down that road, they would always be one step behind Wall Street's inventiveness and greed. I think it would be worth a try.
The administration did propose that derivatives transactions go through clearinghouses and be conducted on transparent, regulated exchanges. But as reform legislation begins to work its way through Congress, Wall Street firms -- including companies that received bailout funds -- have boosted their spending on lobbying and political donations.
As a result, legislation approved Wednesday by the House Agriculture Committee -- which has jurisdiction over the futures markets -- would exempt up to 30 percent of derivatives transactions from new regulations. A bill approved Thursday by the House Financial Services Committee that would create a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, strongly opposed by most luminaries on Wall Street, was amended in the committee to exclude mortgage insurers, title insurers, accountants, lawyers and others.
Banks, meanwhile, are jacking up overdraft charges and instituting new kinds of credit card fees before any new limits kick in. Hey, get it while you can.
Capping salaries and bonuses is fine. But we need to pay attention to the guys in ski masks with bulging bags of money slung over their shoulders. They're about to jump into the getaway car.
So has Obama got all the wrong guys?
Labels:
Perspectives
October 20, 2009
These Amazing Durian Trees!
Please change your facts as to how durian trees bear their fruits. If in the past, they bear it on their branches,today that is no longer the case.
Seeing is believing. Look at these pictures. I could not believe my eyes too!
Seeing is believing. Look at these pictures. I could not believe my eyes too!
Labels:
Perspectives
Teoh Beng Hock: The Forensic Tales of a Homicide Victim
This article by Debra Chong today in the Malaysian Insider is shockingly revealing. What ever happened to the tragic Teoh is taking new shape.
Post-mortem results by a Thai forensic expert has indicated that he could possibly be physically and sexually assaulted, strangled and thrown down from a building.
Let us read Debra's report in verbatim.
KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 21 — Thai pathologist Dr Pornthip Rojanasunand told the Coroner’s Court this morning that there was an 80 per cent probability that Teoh Beng Hock’s death was a homicide and not suicide, and suggested that some of his injuries were sustained before his fatal fall.
She said that Teoh’s injuries showed he could have been strangled and that he sustained anal penetration before he fell to his death earlier this year.
The stunning testimony made by the pathologist, who gained prominence from her work on identifying Tsunami victims and in the recent death of Hollywood star David Carradine, appeared to suggest Teoh was assaulted before his death.
Using a graphics presentation, she told the court that not all the injuries sustained by Teoh were consistent with that of a fall.
The skull fracture on Teoh’s head, she said, was not typical of an injury from a fall, but more compatible from blunt force applied directly to the skull.
She also noted round marks on Teoh’s neck which could mean “manual strangulation” with fingers.
She said that her assessment was based on Teoh’s autopsy report and from photographs taken at the site where his body was found.
Dr Pornthip was engaged as an expert witness by the Selangor state government.
Earlier she told the court that she had conducted over 10,000 autopsies in her career, of which more than 100 dealt with fatal falls from high places.
Post-mortem results by a Thai forensic expert has indicated that he could possibly be physically and sexually assaulted, strangled and thrown down from a building.
Let us read Debra's report in verbatim.
KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 21 — Thai pathologist Dr Pornthip Rojanasunand told the Coroner’s Court this morning that there was an 80 per cent probability that Teoh Beng Hock’s death was a homicide and not suicide, and suggested that some of his injuries were sustained before his fatal fall.
She said that Teoh’s injuries showed he could have been strangled and that he sustained anal penetration before he fell to his death earlier this year.
The stunning testimony made by the pathologist, who gained prominence from her work on identifying Tsunami victims and in the recent death of Hollywood star David Carradine, appeared to suggest Teoh was assaulted before his death.
Using a graphics presentation, she told the court that not all the injuries sustained by Teoh were consistent with that of a fall.
The skull fracture on Teoh’s head, she said, was not typical of an injury from a fall, but more compatible from blunt force applied directly to the skull.
She also noted round marks on Teoh’s neck which could mean “manual strangulation” with fingers.
She said that her assessment was based on Teoh’s autopsy report and from photographs taken at the site where his body was found.
Dr Pornthip was engaged as an expert witness by the Selangor state government.
Earlier she told the court that she had conducted over 10,000 autopsies in her career, of which more than 100 dealt with fatal falls from high places.
Labels:
Perspectives
Dealing with National Debts-A Pricky Issue
Question:
How much debt can an industrialized country carry before it ravages its economy and the nation’s currency?
Right now, that question looms large in the United States, as a surging budget deficit pushes government debt to almost 50 per cent of gross domestic product. In Europe and developing Asian nations like India,it has also become a major concern. But it looms even larger in Japan.
Let us look at the Japanese scenario.
Gross public debt mushroomed during years of stimulus spending on expensive dams and roads. In 2009,it passed 187 per cent of Japan’s economy.
This debt could soon reach twice the size of the US$5 trillion (RM17 trillion) economy — by far the highest debt-to-GDP ratio in recent memory — and the biggest, in real terms, the world has seen. Just imagine,Japan’s outstanding debt is as big as the economies of Britain, France and Germany combined.
Now, in this testy time, a new government in power, has promised yet another ambitious social agenda; to issue more debt this year than Japan has ever issued in a single year. Yesterday, Finance Minister Hirohisa Fujii said the government would sell a record ¥50 trillion (RM1.9 trillion) or more in new bonds this fiscal year to meet a budget shortfall he attributed to the fallout from the global financial crisis.
Japan has pumped about 3 per cent of its economy into stimulus measures aimed at easing the country’s economic slump, the worst among the most developed countries.
“There’s no mistaking the budget deficit stems from the past year’s global recession. Now is the time to be bold and issue more deficit bonds,” Fujii told reporters at the National Press Club in Tokyo. He indicated that tax income for the year could fall below ¥40 trillion, more than ¥6 trillion less than previously expected, as companies continued to suffer from the global recession. For the first time since the chaos of World War II, Japan will issue more in new government bonds than it will receive in tax receipts.
Still, “those who may call this pork-barrel spending — that’s a total lie,” Fujii said.
For jittery investors, Japan’s growing debt raises the nightmarish prospect of a sovereign debt crisis, a currency meltdown or both. Fujii’s remarks raised concerns of a supply glut in bond markets, sending yields on 10-year Japanese government bonds to their highest level in six weeks.
“Public-sector finances are spinning out of control — fast,” said Carl B. Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, in a recent note to clients. “We believe a fiscal crisis is imminent.”
Japan’s troubles also demonstrate how a government saddled with debt can quickly run out of room to maneuver. Plunging tax revenue, anaemic growth prospects and the costs of caring for a rapidly aging population have tied the government’s hands in terms of any workable solutions.
“Japan will keep on selling more bonds this year and next, but that won’t work in three to five years,” said Akito Fukunaga, a fixed-income strategist in Tokyo for Credit Suisse. “If you ask me what Japan can resort to after that, my answer would be, ‘Not very much.’”
How Japan got into such deep debt is a tale of reckless spending. The country poured hundreds of billions of dollars into civil engineering projects in the postwar era, riddling Japan with highways, dams and state-of-the-art ports.
The spending initially fuelled Japan’s rapid postwar growth and kept the Liberal Democratic Party in power for most of the past half-century. But after a spectacular asset and stock market boom collapsed in 1990, the country fell into a long economic malaise.
The Democratic Party, which swept to a landslide electoral victory in August, has promised to rein in the public works spending, cutting as much as a fifth of an extra budget passed by the previous government to divert to social welfare.
But the party’s generous welfare agenda — like cash support for families with children and free high schools — could ultimately widen budget deficits at a time when tax revenue continues to plunge in the aftermath of the global financial crisis, analysts say. “It’s dangerous for the Democrats to push on with all of their policies when tax revenues are so low,” said Chotaro Morita, head of fixed-income strategy at Barclays Capital Japan. “From a global perspective, Japan’s debt ratio is way off the charts.”
Still, officials insist that Japan is better off than the United States by some measures.
For one thing, Japan is rich in personal savings and assets and owes less than 10 per cent of its debt to foreigners. By comparison, about 46 per cent of America’s debt is held overseas by countries like China and Japan.
Moreover, half of Japanese government bonds are held by the public sector, while government regulations encourage long-term investors like banks, pension funds and insurance companies to buy up the rest.
All of this makes a sudden sell-off of government bonds unlikely, officials argue.
“The government is just borrowing from one pocket and putting it in the other,” said Toyoo Gyohten, a former top Finance Ministry official and a special currency adviser to Fujii.
“Although the numbers appear very fearsome, we have some leeway,” Gyohten said during an interview.
But others say the sheer size of Japan’s debt makes even paying off the interest increasingly difficult. Japan’s debt service obligations took up a fifth of the entire budget for 2008, compared with the roughly one-tenth of its budget that the United States spent on servicing its debt.
Each year, Japan doles out more in interest payments alone than the GDP’s of midsize countries like Malaysia or Israel.
Many analysts agree that Japan should forget trying to cut down that debt for now and concentrate on at least making sure that spending does not go overboard again.
“The government needs to stabilize the debt, first and foremost. Only then can it start setting other targets,” said Randall S. Jones, chief economist for Japan and South Korea at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
A credible plan to pare down spending is important “to maintain public confidence in Japan’s fiscal sustainability,” said the OECD’s economic survey of Japan for 2009.
In the long run, even Japan’s sizable assets could fall and eventually turn negative. Japan’s rapidly aging population means retirees are starting to dip into their nest eggs — just as government spending spikes to cover their rising medical bills and pension payments.
The fall in savings could eventually reverse Japan’s current account surplus, possibly driving up interest rates as the public and private sectors compete for funds. Higher interest rates would increase the cost of servicing the debt and hence increase Japan’s default risk.
In the worst case, Japan’s currency could suffer as more investors switched away from Japan to other assets.
And if Japan were to print more money and set off inflation to reduce its debt burden, the supply of yen would shoot up, lowering the currency’s value.
One puzzle, however, is the yen’s resurgence in recent months as the dollar has weakened against major currencies.
The yen recently surged to a seven-month high, with US$1 buying about ¥89 before easing slightly, as near-zero interest rates in the United States prompted investors to take their money elsewhere.
Many strategists say they expect the yen to strengthen further, at least in the short term.
Still, “in 10 or 20 years, Japan’s current account surplus will fall into deficit, and that will lead to a weaker yen,” said Morita at Barclays Capital. “But if investors become pessimistic about Japan before that, the yen will weaken earlier than that.”
A slide in the national currency would not be as detrimental to Japan as it would be to the United States, because most of Tokyo’s debt is held in yen. If the dollar were to depreciate sharply, American debt burdens would surge.
How much debt can an industrialized country carry before it ravages its economy and the nation’s currency?
Right now, that question looms large in the United States, as a surging budget deficit pushes government debt to almost 50 per cent of gross domestic product. In Europe and developing Asian nations like India,it has also become a major concern. But it looms even larger in Japan.
Let us look at the Japanese scenario.
Gross public debt mushroomed during years of stimulus spending on expensive dams and roads. In 2009,it passed 187 per cent of Japan’s economy.
This debt could soon reach twice the size of the US$5 trillion (RM17 trillion) economy — by far the highest debt-to-GDP ratio in recent memory — and the biggest, in real terms, the world has seen. Just imagine,Japan’s outstanding debt is as big as the economies of Britain, France and Germany combined.
Now, in this testy time, a new government in power, has promised yet another ambitious social agenda; to issue more debt this year than Japan has ever issued in a single year. Yesterday, Finance Minister Hirohisa Fujii said the government would sell a record ¥50 trillion (RM1.9 trillion) or more in new bonds this fiscal year to meet a budget shortfall he attributed to the fallout from the global financial crisis.
Japan has pumped about 3 per cent of its economy into stimulus measures aimed at easing the country’s economic slump, the worst among the most developed countries.
“There’s no mistaking the budget deficit stems from the past year’s global recession. Now is the time to be bold and issue more deficit bonds,” Fujii told reporters at the National Press Club in Tokyo. He indicated that tax income for the year could fall below ¥40 trillion, more than ¥6 trillion less than previously expected, as companies continued to suffer from the global recession. For the first time since the chaos of World War II, Japan will issue more in new government bonds than it will receive in tax receipts.
Still, “those who may call this pork-barrel spending — that’s a total lie,” Fujii said.
For jittery investors, Japan’s growing debt raises the nightmarish prospect of a sovereign debt crisis, a currency meltdown or both. Fujii’s remarks raised concerns of a supply glut in bond markets, sending yields on 10-year Japanese government bonds to their highest level in six weeks.
“Public-sector finances are spinning out of control — fast,” said Carl B. Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, in a recent note to clients. “We believe a fiscal crisis is imminent.”
Japan’s troubles also demonstrate how a government saddled with debt can quickly run out of room to maneuver. Plunging tax revenue, anaemic growth prospects and the costs of caring for a rapidly aging population have tied the government’s hands in terms of any workable solutions.
“Japan will keep on selling more bonds this year and next, but that won’t work in three to five years,” said Akito Fukunaga, a fixed-income strategist in Tokyo for Credit Suisse. “If you ask me what Japan can resort to after that, my answer would be, ‘Not very much.’”
How Japan got into such deep debt is a tale of reckless spending. The country poured hundreds of billions of dollars into civil engineering projects in the postwar era, riddling Japan with highways, dams and state-of-the-art ports.
The spending initially fuelled Japan’s rapid postwar growth and kept the Liberal Democratic Party in power for most of the past half-century. But after a spectacular asset and stock market boom collapsed in 1990, the country fell into a long economic malaise.
The Democratic Party, which swept to a landslide electoral victory in August, has promised to rein in the public works spending, cutting as much as a fifth of an extra budget passed by the previous government to divert to social welfare.
But the party’s generous welfare agenda — like cash support for families with children and free high schools — could ultimately widen budget deficits at a time when tax revenue continues to plunge in the aftermath of the global financial crisis, analysts say. “It’s dangerous for the Democrats to push on with all of their policies when tax revenues are so low,” said Chotaro Morita, head of fixed-income strategy at Barclays Capital Japan. “From a global perspective, Japan’s debt ratio is way off the charts.”
Still, officials insist that Japan is better off than the United States by some measures.
For one thing, Japan is rich in personal savings and assets and owes less than 10 per cent of its debt to foreigners. By comparison, about 46 per cent of America’s debt is held overseas by countries like China and Japan.
Moreover, half of Japanese government bonds are held by the public sector, while government regulations encourage long-term investors like banks, pension funds and insurance companies to buy up the rest.
All of this makes a sudden sell-off of government bonds unlikely, officials argue.
“The government is just borrowing from one pocket and putting it in the other,” said Toyoo Gyohten, a former top Finance Ministry official and a special currency adviser to Fujii.
“Although the numbers appear very fearsome, we have some leeway,” Gyohten said during an interview.
But others say the sheer size of Japan’s debt makes even paying off the interest increasingly difficult. Japan’s debt service obligations took up a fifth of the entire budget for 2008, compared with the roughly one-tenth of its budget that the United States spent on servicing its debt.
Each year, Japan doles out more in interest payments alone than the GDP’s of midsize countries like Malaysia or Israel.
Many analysts agree that Japan should forget trying to cut down that debt for now and concentrate on at least making sure that spending does not go overboard again.
“The government needs to stabilize the debt, first and foremost. Only then can it start setting other targets,” said Randall S. Jones, chief economist for Japan and South Korea at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
A credible plan to pare down spending is important “to maintain public confidence in Japan’s fiscal sustainability,” said the OECD’s economic survey of Japan for 2009.
In the long run, even Japan’s sizable assets could fall and eventually turn negative. Japan’s rapidly aging population means retirees are starting to dip into their nest eggs — just as government spending spikes to cover their rising medical bills and pension payments.
The fall in savings could eventually reverse Japan’s current account surplus, possibly driving up interest rates as the public and private sectors compete for funds. Higher interest rates would increase the cost of servicing the debt and hence increase Japan’s default risk.
In the worst case, Japan’s currency could suffer as more investors switched away from Japan to other assets.
And if Japan were to print more money and set off inflation to reduce its debt burden, the supply of yen would shoot up, lowering the currency’s value.
One puzzle, however, is the yen’s resurgence in recent months as the dollar has weakened against major currencies.
The yen recently surged to a seven-month high, with US$1 buying about ¥89 before easing slightly, as near-zero interest rates in the United States prompted investors to take their money elsewhere.
Many strategists say they expect the yen to strengthen further, at least in the short term.
Still, “in 10 or 20 years, Japan’s current account surplus will fall into deficit, and that will lead to a weaker yen,” said Morita at Barclays Capital. “But if investors become pessimistic about Japan before that, the yen will weaken earlier than that.”
A slide in the national currency would not be as detrimental to Japan as it would be to the United States, because most of Tokyo’s debt is held in yen. If the dollar were to depreciate sharply, American debt burdens would surge.
Labels:
Economy
Get Ready for the Transition!
Now you too can drive and fly as well.
The Transition, a hybridized surface and air combo vehicle is currently in the POC (Proof of Concept) stage. So far, it has been promising.If all goes well, commercial production will start in 2011.
A spokesman of the production company,Terrafugia explains,"Simply land at the airport, fold your wings up and drive home. The test distance has been 725 kilometers at speeds of 115 km /hour."
He added,"You do require a special license to drive and fly the Transition."
Flight testing has yielded the following information.
The time required for the transition from plane to car takes less than 30 seconds.
Vehicle speed is 185 km /hour, while range is 724 km on highways.
Vehicle is fueled with gasoline,
The price of the car is expected to be around $200,000.
So in our currency, it adds up to something like RM700,000. A small price for buying sheer luxury!
The Transition, a hybridized surface and air combo vehicle is currently in the POC (Proof of Concept) stage. So far, it has been promising.If all goes well, commercial production will start in 2011.
A spokesman of the production company,Terrafugia explains,"Simply land at the airport, fold your wings up and drive home. The test distance has been 725 kilometers at speeds of 115 km /hour."
He added,"You do require a special license to drive and fly the Transition."
Flight testing has yielded the following information.
The time required for the transition from plane to car takes less than 30 seconds.
Vehicle speed is 185 km /hour, while range is 724 km on highways.
Vehicle is fueled with gasoline,
The price of the car is expected to be around $200,000.
So in our currency, it adds up to something like RM700,000. A small price for buying sheer luxury!
Labels:
Perspectives
Believe it! The Praying Prayer Mats!
News of strange happenings was abuzzing in the small town of Pasir Mas in Kelantan on October 20th.
At a local school,the Sekolah Kebangsaan Tok Sangkut, 35 prayer mats supposedly mysteriously raise themselves in the musalla (place where prayer is performed), with some appearing like people performing their prayers.
Teacher Adnan Abdullah, 37, said he was informed of the matter by a student during his class near the musalla.
“Because my classroom is being renovated, I carry out lessons outside and at about 10.40am, a student had glanced in the direction of the musalla and saw the ‘standing’ prayer mats,” he told reporters here today.
Adnan said he then opened the door to the musalla and was shocked to see 35 prayer mats in a standing position, 16 of which were standing in the male section and 19 in the female section.
“What was even more weird was that there was one (prayer mat) at the very front, as if it was acting as an imam leading a congregational prayer,” said the teacher who has been teaching at the school for seven years.
He said the same thing happened at a villager’s house during Ramadan where a prayer mat was said to have stood by itself.
People thronged the school on hearing about the “phenomenon” to see for themselves the “standing” prayer mats.
What do you gather from this occurrence? A figment of imagination or an episode from "the Twilight Zone"?
At a local school,the Sekolah Kebangsaan Tok Sangkut, 35 prayer mats supposedly mysteriously raise themselves in the musalla (place where prayer is performed), with some appearing like people performing their prayers.
Teacher Adnan Abdullah, 37, said he was informed of the matter by a student during his class near the musalla.
“Because my classroom is being renovated, I carry out lessons outside and at about 10.40am, a student had glanced in the direction of the musalla and saw the ‘standing’ prayer mats,” he told reporters here today.
Adnan said he then opened the door to the musalla and was shocked to see 35 prayer mats in a standing position, 16 of which were standing in the male section and 19 in the female section.
“What was even more weird was that there was one (prayer mat) at the very front, as if it was acting as an imam leading a congregational prayer,” said the teacher who has been teaching at the school for seven years.
He said the same thing happened at a villager’s house during Ramadan where a prayer mat was said to have stood by itself.
People thronged the school on hearing about the “phenomenon” to see for themselves the “standing” prayer mats.
What do you gather from this occurrence? A figment of imagination or an episode from "the Twilight Zone"?
Labels:
Perspectives
Metronic Global's Brand New Direction
After a long Rip Van Winkle session of about close to 5 years, Metronic Global Berhad (MGB)finally sprung back to life.
On 15th October, it announced that its wholly owned special purpose company, namely Anhui Lai’An Metronic Water Supply Co. Ltd, has commenced the earthworks of the construction for the water treatment plant in Lai’An County, Anhui Province in the PRC and is expected to be completed by year 2010.
This BOT Water Concession is for a period of 33 years (inclusive of 3 years construction period) with the total estimated costs and funding for construction of the water treatment plant of approximately RMB61 million (equivalent to RM30 million at an exchange rate of RMB1 equals to RM0.49).
The BOT Water Concession is expected to contribute positively to the future earnings of MGB upon the completion of construction in year 2010.
So, apart from just telemetry and computerised health systems, MGB is now right into the business of utilities which will certainly use their in-house telemetry technology for control purposes.
On 15th October, it announced that its wholly owned special purpose company, namely Anhui Lai’An Metronic Water Supply Co. Ltd, has commenced the earthworks of the construction for the water treatment plant in Lai’An County, Anhui Province in the PRC and is expected to be completed by year 2010.
This BOT Water Concession is for a period of 33 years (inclusive of 3 years construction period) with the total estimated costs and funding for construction of the water treatment plant of approximately RMB61 million (equivalent to RM30 million at an exchange rate of RMB1 equals to RM0.49).
The BOT Water Concession is expected to contribute positively to the future earnings of MGB upon the completion of construction in year 2010.
So, apart from just telemetry and computerised health systems, MGB is now right into the business of utilities which will certainly use their in-house telemetry technology for control purposes.
Labels:
Stocks
October 19, 2009
Walla! The Malaysian F1 Team
Tongue-in-cheek,this could just be the Malaysian F1 Team.
In the true spirit of the 1Malaysia concept of PM Najib,this could well be it. Three drivers of the component races in the drivers' seats.
Another Malaysia Boleh!
In the true spirit of the 1Malaysia concept of PM Najib,this could well be it. Three drivers of the component races in the drivers' seats.
Another Malaysia Boleh!
Labels:
Perspectives
Wilbur Ross: Buying Garbage Quality Banks
NEW YORK, Oct 20 — Foreclosed homes, failed banks, and toxic assets produced during the current recession might look like a mountain of garbage to most people.
But to billionaire investor Wilbur Ross, they are “a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.”
This year, Ross has emerged as one of the government’s closest allies in mopping up the mess resulting from the financial crisis.
Earlier this month, his firm WL Ross partnered with a consortium of investors and paid US$554 million (RM1.86 billion) to buy a pool of bad loans from failed Chicago bank Corus.
And last May, he was part of a group that bought BankUnited, a failed Florida bank, for US$900 million.
Ross (picture) also was an early participant in a federal programme in which the government provided part of the financing to investors willing to buy securities backed by credit card debt and auto loans.
The goal: get credit flowing again in those moribund markets.
Ross bought around US$400 million of those loans. Now, he has raised US$1 billion to buy toxic assets from banks, in partnership with the government. Bank failures have reached 99 this year, vs. 25 in all of 2008, draining the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.’s resources. The government has no option but to turn to deep-pocketed private-equity investors such as Ross for help.
No wonder Ross says that he is preparing to buy more banks.
“There will be another 500 banks that will fail before we get through with this crisis,” says the soft-spoken financier during an interview from his glass-walled offices in Midtown Manhattan.
Ross exudes an almost Zen-like personality, a trait that has brought him respect in a world that is dominated by big personalities.
“Private-equity guys tend to be huge egomaniacs, hyper-speed people like Gordon Gekko,” says Bob Profusek, head of mergers and acquisitions at law firm Jones Day, who has worked with Ross on several deals.
Gekko is the brash character played by actor Michael Douglas in the movie Wall Street. “But Wilbur is calm. With him. you learn that you don’t have to pound the table to make a point.”
It is probably Ross’ contrarian nature that has allowed him to zag when others zig and why he has managed to avoid some of the large losses suffered by some of his private-equity competitors.
For instance, the once-vaunted private-equity firm Cerberus gobbled up such companies as Chrysler and GMAC in recent years, and then had to disgorge part of them when their losses mounted. Chrysler filed for bankruptcy-court protection, and GMAC was bailed out by the government last year.
Other private-equity firms, which make big, privately transacted investments in companies, have also suffered massive losses the past year — making many of them gun-shy about entering into new deals.
That isn’t a good situation for the government, which is desperately looking for private business to jump-start the economy with programs, such as the Public Private Partnership Investment Program, through which the Treasur will sell US$50 billion in bad loans.
Another federal programme, offering investors an incentive to buy up debt issued by financial institutions looking to raise capital, guaranteed that debt. Major financial institutions, from Citigroup to GE Capital, have raised more than US$300 billion that way.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said these were necessary steps “to get credit flowing again, to restore confidence in our markets, and restore the faith of the American people.”
However, the success of Geithner’s programs depended on private investors participating. “Government investment … should be replaced with private capital as soon as possible,” he said.
Ross’ private-equity firm, along with just a handful of others, took advantage of those incentives and bought government-backed securities, helping restore the market’s confidence within months.
“This was a brilliant move on Secretary Geithner’s part and really helped revive the markets much quicker than anybody anticipated,” Ross says.
The ultimate contrarian investor, Ross built his reputation after the Sept 11, 2001, attacks and the resulting economic downturn that pushed dying companies into bankruptcy in the steel, coal and textile industries.
His most famous transaction was making a US$325 million investment in bankrupt steelmaker LTV in 2002 and turning it into a US$4.5 billion sale in 2004. Ross even outmaneuvered the world’s most famous investor, Warren Buffett, when he wrested away bankrupt North Carolina textile manufacturer Burlington from Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway in 2003.
Ross is somewhat of a late bloomer. The son of a lawyer and a school teacher, he grew up in North Bergen in New Jersey before attending Yale and Harvard Business School. While at Yale, Ross wanted to be a creative writer but gave up that dream early on. “Three weeks into the programme, I ran out of material to write,” he says.
For 26 years, Ross quietly built a reputation as a bankruptcy expert at the Rothschild family’s US business operations. On April 1, 2000, he branched out on his own and formed WL Ross with US$200 million in capital. He was 62.
Since then, Ross has surprised the world with contrarian deals totaling more than US$8 billion. Today, he also manages private capital and government-related investments for Invesco, to whom he sold his firm in 2006 for about US$375 million.
Ross continues to run his firm and make all investing decisions, while Invesco’s deeper pockets help him fish for bigger deals.
Ross married socialite Hilary Geary in 2004. They have a home in Palm Beach, and a pied-á-terre in New York — a penthouse with views of Central Park and Carnegie Hall. Ross and his wife like to entertain, and they have been featured on websites, such as New York Social Diary, which chronicle the party scene of the city’s elite.
At his home, Ross is known to drop his bland financier personality and let his impish side take hold.
“At work, he is an astute buyer of distressed assets, but at his home he’s a little bit of a prankster who likes to tell a joke at the table,” says real estate mogul Richard LeFrak, who joined Ross in purchasing bad assets from failed bank Corus.
LeFrak says he recently attended a birthday party for Ross at his home in Palm Beach, where guests were asked to wear masks. When guests arrived and found Wilbur Ross masks lying around, many of them donned those instead.
Clearly, Ross’ surprises aren’t limited to investments. — USAToday
But to billionaire investor Wilbur Ross, they are “a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.”
This year, Ross has emerged as one of the government’s closest allies in mopping up the mess resulting from the financial crisis.
Earlier this month, his firm WL Ross partnered with a consortium of investors and paid US$554 million (RM1.86 billion) to buy a pool of bad loans from failed Chicago bank Corus.
And last May, he was part of a group that bought BankUnited, a failed Florida bank, for US$900 million.
Ross (picture) also was an early participant in a federal programme in which the government provided part of the financing to investors willing to buy securities backed by credit card debt and auto loans.
The goal: get credit flowing again in those moribund markets.
Ross bought around US$400 million of those loans. Now, he has raised US$1 billion to buy toxic assets from banks, in partnership with the government. Bank failures have reached 99 this year, vs. 25 in all of 2008, draining the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.’s resources. The government has no option but to turn to deep-pocketed private-equity investors such as Ross for help.
No wonder Ross says that he is preparing to buy more banks.
“There will be another 500 banks that will fail before we get through with this crisis,” says the soft-spoken financier during an interview from his glass-walled offices in Midtown Manhattan.
Ross exudes an almost Zen-like personality, a trait that has brought him respect in a world that is dominated by big personalities.
“Private-equity guys tend to be huge egomaniacs, hyper-speed people like Gordon Gekko,” says Bob Profusek, head of mergers and acquisitions at law firm Jones Day, who has worked with Ross on several deals.
Gekko is the brash character played by actor Michael Douglas in the movie Wall Street. “But Wilbur is calm. With him. you learn that you don’t have to pound the table to make a point.”
It is probably Ross’ contrarian nature that has allowed him to zag when others zig and why he has managed to avoid some of the large losses suffered by some of his private-equity competitors.
For instance, the once-vaunted private-equity firm Cerberus gobbled up such companies as Chrysler and GMAC in recent years, and then had to disgorge part of them when their losses mounted. Chrysler filed for bankruptcy-court protection, and GMAC was bailed out by the government last year.
Other private-equity firms, which make big, privately transacted investments in companies, have also suffered massive losses the past year — making many of them gun-shy about entering into new deals.
That isn’t a good situation for the government, which is desperately looking for private business to jump-start the economy with programs, such as the Public Private Partnership Investment Program, through which the Treasur will sell US$50 billion in bad loans.
Another federal programme, offering investors an incentive to buy up debt issued by financial institutions looking to raise capital, guaranteed that debt. Major financial institutions, from Citigroup to GE Capital, have raised more than US$300 billion that way.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said these were necessary steps “to get credit flowing again, to restore confidence in our markets, and restore the faith of the American people.”
However, the success of Geithner’s programs depended on private investors participating. “Government investment … should be replaced with private capital as soon as possible,” he said.
Ross’ private-equity firm, along with just a handful of others, took advantage of those incentives and bought government-backed securities, helping restore the market’s confidence within months.
“This was a brilliant move on Secretary Geithner’s part and really helped revive the markets much quicker than anybody anticipated,” Ross says.
The ultimate contrarian investor, Ross built his reputation after the Sept 11, 2001, attacks and the resulting economic downturn that pushed dying companies into bankruptcy in the steel, coal and textile industries.
His most famous transaction was making a US$325 million investment in bankrupt steelmaker LTV in 2002 and turning it into a US$4.5 billion sale in 2004. Ross even outmaneuvered the world’s most famous investor, Warren Buffett, when he wrested away bankrupt North Carolina textile manufacturer Burlington from Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway in 2003.
Ross is somewhat of a late bloomer. The son of a lawyer and a school teacher, he grew up in North Bergen in New Jersey before attending Yale and Harvard Business School. While at Yale, Ross wanted to be a creative writer but gave up that dream early on. “Three weeks into the programme, I ran out of material to write,” he says.
For 26 years, Ross quietly built a reputation as a bankruptcy expert at the Rothschild family’s US business operations. On April 1, 2000, he branched out on his own and formed WL Ross with US$200 million in capital. He was 62.
Since then, Ross has surprised the world with contrarian deals totaling more than US$8 billion. Today, he also manages private capital and government-related investments for Invesco, to whom he sold his firm in 2006 for about US$375 million.
Ross continues to run his firm and make all investing decisions, while Invesco’s deeper pockets help him fish for bigger deals.
Ross married socialite Hilary Geary in 2004. They have a home in Palm Beach, and a pied-á-terre in New York — a penthouse with views of Central Park and Carnegie Hall. Ross and his wife like to entertain, and they have been featured on websites, such as New York Social Diary, which chronicle the party scene of the city’s elite.
At his home, Ross is known to drop his bland financier personality and let his impish side take hold.
“At work, he is an astute buyer of distressed assets, but at his home he’s a little bit of a prankster who likes to tell a joke at the table,” says real estate mogul Richard LeFrak, who joined Ross in purchasing bad assets from failed bank Corus.
LeFrak says he recently attended a birthday party for Ross at his home in Palm Beach, where guests were asked to wear masks. When guests arrived and found Wilbur Ross masks lying around, many of them donned those instead.
Clearly, Ross’ surprises aren’t limited to investments. — USAToday
Labels:
Perspectives
The Pirates of MCA
Ti Lian Ker's blog was indeed an eye opener. It is a first hand infroamtion of what took place on the evening of 15th October.
It told of the machinations in the MCA, the cut and thrust maneuvers of erstwhile friends turned enemies and the blind galloping greed for power and position. This is the worse situation that has ever developed in MCA since the days of the warring factions of Neo Yee Pan versus Tan Koon Swan.
Close on the heels of the double tenth tragedy, the beleaguered President came home to a dysfunctional MCA Central Committee which reeks of of wanton greed and political debauchery. Friends who were along with him through the thick and thin of times dispose the much maligned Dr. Chua, went on selective memory mode and changed sides; opposing him instead. They wanted blood- the President's and his immediate resignation. Strangely,they would not subscribed to the principle of collective responsibility and resign honorably along with him.
At the end of the day, only 12 CC members were the Presidents loyalists. Even his close friend, the Secretary-General deserted him! Except for 6 members who were from Dr. Chua’s camp, the others have banded together to force the President’s hand.
Not to be undone, the President under siege, played his one last card-The prerogative right to call another EGM, which he did!
So, it is turmoil time once more in the MCA.
No one knows for sure how this mess will end legally. What we can see is that there is little morality in MCA. Do the Chinese want a party without any moral fibre to lead them?
Your guess is as good as mine.
It told of the machinations in the MCA, the cut and thrust maneuvers of erstwhile friends turned enemies and the blind galloping greed for power and position. This is the worse situation that has ever developed in MCA since the days of the warring factions of Neo Yee Pan versus Tan Koon Swan.
Close on the heels of the double tenth tragedy, the beleaguered President came home to a dysfunctional MCA Central Committee which reeks of of wanton greed and political debauchery. Friends who were along with him through the thick and thin of times dispose the much maligned Dr. Chua, went on selective memory mode and changed sides; opposing him instead. They wanted blood- the President's and his immediate resignation. Strangely,they would not subscribed to the principle of collective responsibility and resign honorably along with him.
At the end of the day, only 12 CC members were the Presidents loyalists. Even his close friend, the Secretary-General deserted him! Except for 6 members who were from Dr. Chua’s camp, the others have banded together to force the President’s hand.
Not to be undone, the President under siege, played his one last card-The prerogative right to call another EGM, which he did!
So, it is turmoil time once more in the MCA.
No one knows for sure how this mess will end legally. What we can see is that there is little morality in MCA. Do the Chinese want a party without any moral fibre to lead them?
Your guess is as good as mine.
Labels:
Perspectives
Singapore: Digging further into its Coffers
By all government estimation, the future remains murky. So, Singapore will lift spending from infrastructure to education next year and maintain a similar budget deficit as in 2009. This is a less than enthusiastic sign for it meant that export-dependent Singapore continue to fear an economic rebound will not be possible without strong government support.
The government tapped reserves for the first time this year to fund part of a US$13.7 billion (RM46.23 billion) stimulus in January’s budget that was aimed at helping companies and saving jobs during the country’s worst ever recession. “We are spending a lot more next year and the coming years compared to the past. If we take infrastructure alone, we are spending more,” said a spokesman, adding "Spending is also rising on education and health-care."
He did not say how much spending would be allocated for 2010 ir how much big the fiscal deficit would be. The deficit for the fiscal year ending March 2010 will be Singapore’s largest ever at about 6 per cent of gross domestic product.
Singapore’s economy has undoubtedly rebounded, returning to year-on-year growth in the third quarter after three quarters of annual contractions, However,the government feels that the global financial system is still fragile.
“The underlining problems haven’t been resolved,” he said, pointing to fears about the extent of any economic recovery and of banks’ ability to start lending again.
“So confidence hasn’t returned to normal. We and seasoned observers all over the world do not expect the next year or two to be a very pretty one,” he said.
Singapore’s central bank kept an easy monetary stance and decided against allowing appreciation in the Singapore dollar at a twice-yearly policy review earlier this month, as it said demand in key export markets had not decisively recovered.
Policymakers around the world are debating when to remove growth-supporting policies, with the Australian central bank becoming the first G20 central bank to tighten policy as the financial crisis eases, spurring expectations others may follow.
Corporate tax revenues were expected to have been dampened this year as it was a bad year for many firms, so the government’s revenues would not rise in line with spending.
“The key issue is not merely going to be the size of fiscal year deficit that we are going to run in the next fiscal year, but the type of measures that we are going to put in place. We will be more discriminating,” said the spokesman.
It was not clear if the government would tap into its reserves again. The size of Singapore’s reserves have never been disclosed but include at least $220 billion at its two sovereign wealth funds Temasek and GIC.
“Overall I don’t expect that you will see a major shift from an expansionary fiscal stance that we have this year. It is too early to say what our fiscal position will be...we have some savings as I have indicated in the budget this year and we’ll make sure we’ll live within our means.”
Knowing self-sufficient Singapore,they will do what is expedient and prudent to accelerate growth, even if it meant going back again to take out those money squirreled away in its hidden vaults!
The government tapped reserves for the first time this year to fund part of a US$13.7 billion (RM46.23 billion) stimulus in January’s budget that was aimed at helping companies and saving jobs during the country’s worst ever recession. “We are spending a lot more next year and the coming years compared to the past. If we take infrastructure alone, we are spending more,” said a spokesman, adding "Spending is also rising on education and health-care."
He did not say how much spending would be allocated for 2010 ir how much big the fiscal deficit would be. The deficit for the fiscal year ending March 2010 will be Singapore’s largest ever at about 6 per cent of gross domestic product.
Singapore’s economy has undoubtedly rebounded, returning to year-on-year growth in the third quarter after three quarters of annual contractions, However,the government feels that the global financial system is still fragile.
“The underlining problems haven’t been resolved,” he said, pointing to fears about the extent of any economic recovery and of banks’ ability to start lending again.
“So confidence hasn’t returned to normal. We and seasoned observers all over the world do not expect the next year or two to be a very pretty one,” he said.
Singapore’s central bank kept an easy monetary stance and decided against allowing appreciation in the Singapore dollar at a twice-yearly policy review earlier this month, as it said demand in key export markets had not decisively recovered.
Policymakers around the world are debating when to remove growth-supporting policies, with the Australian central bank becoming the first G20 central bank to tighten policy as the financial crisis eases, spurring expectations others may follow.
Corporate tax revenues were expected to have been dampened this year as it was a bad year for many firms, so the government’s revenues would not rise in line with spending.
“The key issue is not merely going to be the size of fiscal year deficit that we are going to run in the next fiscal year, but the type of measures that we are going to put in place. We will be more discriminating,” said the spokesman.
It was not clear if the government would tap into its reserves again. The size of Singapore’s reserves have never been disclosed but include at least $220 billion at its two sovereign wealth funds Temasek and GIC.
“Overall I don’t expect that you will see a major shift from an expansionary fiscal stance that we have this year. It is too early to say what our fiscal position will be...we have some savings as I have indicated in the budget this year and we’ll make sure we’ll live within our means.”
Knowing self-sufficient Singapore,they will do what is expedient and prudent to accelerate growth, even if it meant going back again to take out those money squirreled away in its hidden vaults!
Labels:
Economy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)