January 03, 2011

Property 2011-A Mixed Bag


Angie Ng of the STAR reviews the property market and its potential in 2011 and came away with different outlooks for different pockets of the sector.

Every one of course concur with her that 2010 was quite an eventful one for the local housing market with strong demand and record prices registered in key property hot spots that included the Klang Valley and Penang.

Concerns over potential overheating had culminated in Bank Negara’s imposition in early November of a maximum loan-to-value ratio (LVR) of 70% for third home mortgages.

Buyers of landed properties in sought-after locations have benefited from good capital appreciation, with prices appreciating by between 20% and 30% year-on-year.

Most of the home-buying activities were fuelled by cheap cost of funding and huge liquidity in the banking system.

So, what is in store for 2011? Will home sales and prices continue to strengthen or will they sustain at current levels or start to head south?

CB Richard Ellis Sdn Bhd executive chairman Christopher Boyd believes the prices of landed properties in the Klang Valley and Penang will continue to rise, supported by a strong economy, which will be spurred by heavy expenditure on infrastructure and other projects, and high commodity prices. However, the effect in Johor will be more muted because demand has not been so strong.

“I believe the root cause of the strong growth in landed property prices in the Klang Valley and Penang in 2010 was a reduction in supply which followed the global economic crisis. Developers simply turned off the tap for a while until the future became clearer, and this is supported by data from the National Property Information Centre.

“The economy and confidence soon bounced back and so the result was a temporary supply squeeze which of course will ease this year as developers increase supply,” Boyd says.

As finance is still cheap and confidence remains high, he expects landed property prices to continue to rise in value, albeit at a slower rate. However, luxury high-rise residences in the Kuala Lumpur City Centre and Mon’t Kiara localities will continue to face a challenging market in view of ample supply and weak rental demand.

“Well-located medium-cost high-rise dwellings will remain in strong demand from younger middle-class buyers and we will see a continuation of the trend towards building small affordable units close to the central business district.” Boyd does not see any material impact from the 70% LVR ruling on third mortgages but says it is nevertheless a very timely message “that one has to be careful not to over-commit because prices may level off, making it more difficult to exit.”

He says the redevelopment of the Rubber Research Institute land in Sg Buloh and the Sg Besi airport has the potential to be phenomenal success and will benchmark Malaysia’s skill in producing large-scale developments of a very high quality.

According to ECM Libra research head Bernard Ching, property sales and price appreciation are expected to moderate in 2011.

He expects slower speculative demand due to the central bank’s LVR cap. Furthermore, the intense competition among banks in the mortgage market is not sustainable as net interest margins (NIMs) have compressed to very low levels.

He believes that banks may have to raise rates and/or cease offering zero-moving cost mortgages to alleviate further pressure on NIMs. This will result in higher financing costs to house-buyers. On the outlook for the commercial property sector, Boyd says there will be further upsides in the office market, especially if the country’s economic recovery is sustainable.

“I believe that with the right planning, the office market can be easily well balanced in terms of supply and demand. The Klang Valley office space market will remain quite resilient this year in the face of only moderate new supply and quite buoyant take up.”

Boyd estimates a further 3.5 million sq ft of office space would be completed in Kuala Lumpur this year.

He says it is more of a seller’s market right now as there is not enough investible buildings around to meet demand. Given the lower entry cost, demand is getting stronger especially for office buildings that are well managed and located, have high occupancy and good yields.

“Similarly, the retail property sector is likely to strengthen slightly in 2011 with only moderate new supply and strong demographic of a young and growing workforce,” he adds.

On the interest for commercial property, Boyd says that in the aftermath of the global financial crisis, while commercial rentals fell, the capital value of commercial property held up well.

“The reason for this is that investors had become severely disillusioned with stock markets and were still prepared to pay competitive prices for income-yielding commercial property, so in fact yield expectations dropped.

“This is a phenomenon that was seen all around the globe,” he says.

So, that is the way the cookie will crumble?

Let us see the new year out for the property market.

January 01, 2011

BLand: Hibernation Mode for Now


Berjaya Land Berhad (BLand) will be the counter in the Berjaya Group stable to watch as it has really gone no where in 2010.

If the BJToto counter is really privatised, then BLand will be the direct owner of the number forecast gaming company that owns about close to 40% of the NFO in Malaysia. Then it will be going places.
:
Let us look at some of the development or sadly non-development of BLand.

The first project held in long hibernation relates to the
:
(1) Proposed acquisition of about 244.79 acres of leasehold land located in Sungai Besi (“Sungai Besi Land”) together with all existing buildings and structures erected thereon by Selat Makmur Sdn Bhd ("SMSB"), a 100%-owned subsidiary of Bland, from Selangor Turf Club (“STC”) for a total consideration of RM640.0 million ("proposed acquisition of Sungai Besi Land"); and

(2) Proposed acquisition of about 750.0 acres of freehold land located in Sungai Tinggi (“Sungai Tinggi Land”) by SMSB from Berjayacity Sdn Bhd (“BCSB”) and the proposed appointment of BCSB as the turnkey contractor to carry out the construction of the new turf club for a total consideration of RM605.0 million (“proposed acquisition of Sungai Tinggi Land”)

Both of these are collectively referred to as the “proposals”

And now what is the status?

For starters, the Board of Directors of BLand ("Board") wishes to announce that STC has officially notified SMSB via a letter dated 27 December 2010 granting a further extension of time from 19 January 2011 to 18 January 2012 to fulfill the conditions precedent pursuant to the Proposed Acquisition of Sungai Besi Land. Details of the conditions precedent which have yet to be fulfilled as announced on 16 August 2010 are as follows:-

(a) renewal of consent by Land and Mines Department (Federal) for the transfer to SMSB of the portion of Sungai Besi Land (held under H.S.(D) 61790 No. P.T. 2872 in the Mukim of Petaling, District and State of Wilayah Persekutuan) that resides in Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur which had expired on 11 January 2006;

(b) agreement being reached between STC and SMSB on the layout plans, building plans, designs, drawings and specifications for the New Turf Club. Pending the fulfillment of Item (c) below, STC and SMSB have not finalized the layout plans, building plans, designs, drawings and specifications for the New Turf Club; and

(c) the approval, permit or consent of any other relevant authorities as may be required by applicable laws include inter-alia the following:-
 
(i)                approval from the Town and Country Planning Department of the State of Selangor on the re-tabling of the amended master layout plan which was re-submitted on 19 August 2008;

(ii) approval from the Majlis Daerah Hulu Selangor for the Development Order, earthworks and infrastructure and building plan pertaining to the construction of the New Turf Club after approval under Item (c) (i) above is obtained; and

(iii) approval from the State Exco of Selangor for the conversion and sub-division of Sungai Tinggi Land after approvals under Item (c) (i) and (ii) above are obtained.

Now let us move on the next project.

Proposed Development of a of a resort-type residential & commercial complex in Yerae-Dong, Seogwipo-Si, Jeju special self-governing province ("project ")

Berjaya Jeju Resort Limited, the joint-venture company undertaking the of Jeju’s Casino Resort Project has yet to obtain the casino licence. The issuance of the casino licence is conditional upon, inter-alia, completion of the construction of the hotel. The proposed full-fledged casino will be housed in the hotel which forms part of the Project development.
 
This is the latest up-date.

Not very promising,yah?

JAKS is Jumping Up Again

As I see it, the so called bad days are just about over for JAKS.


The sad-bad years where it was cheated out of the profitable re-piping project in Selangor may just be turning good in 2010 and beyond. The court case for arbitration is still on and JAKS may see some retribution here soon as well.

Apart from winning the UTAR Section 17 campus renovation project and a portion of the Pahang-Selangor Water Transfer Project, it has got another project.

Its wholly-owned subsidiary, JAKS Sdn Bhd (JSB) has now secured a RM201 million construction contract for the earthworks, retaining wall, piling works and sub-structure works for the proposed commercial development of Phase 1-5 Commercial Block of 15 storey and 4 storey basement at Lot 59215 (PM55) and 59216 (PN8025), Jalan PJU 1A/4, Ara Damansara, Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan (“Contract”) from MNH Global Assets Management Sdn Bhd.

The Contract is expected to be completed by March 2012 and is expected to improve the future earnings of the JAKS Group.

None of the Directors or Major Shareholders of JAKS and persons connected with them has any interest, direct or indirect, in the Contract save that MNH Global Assets Management Sdn Bhd is wholly owned by Island Circle Development (M) Sdn Bhd (ICDSB), a major shareholder of JAKS Island Circle Sdn Bhd (“JIC”), which is 51%-owned by JSB and 49%-owned by ICDSB.

For now, JAKS performance has improved. The latest set of quarterly results for 2010 is absolutely pleasing to the eyes.

Year on year up to 31 October 2010, the comparisons of the figures  are exponential.

For full year accounting, profit before tax for current 2010 is RM4.439 million as compared to a loss in 2001 of RM2.430 million. Profit after tax amounts to RM2.38 million as compared to a loss of RM6.386 million in 2009. The basic earning has improved to 0.52 sen as compared to a loss of 1.54 sen last year.

Compared to the equivalent preceding quarter in 2009, PBT is now RM85.742 million as compared to RM62,313 million in 2009. Profit is now at RM2.530 million as compared to a loss of RM580,000 last year. Basic earning per unit has moved up to 27 sen as compared to negative 71 sen in 2009.

So,looks like 2011 may become one great year for JAKS if all the pieces fell into place.

So,watch the counter.

Wilmar Latest 2010 Corporate Adventure in China

Yes,Wilmar has joined its sister companies Shangri-la and Kerry to bid for China sites.


Wilmar International, the world’s largest listed palm oil firm, said as the eve of the New Year 2011 that it will submit a joint bid to buy the land use rights for six sites in China’s northern province of Liaoning.

Wilmar will partner Kerry Properties and Shangri-la Asia, two firms linked to Malaysian billionaire Robert Kuok, in the bid.

Wilmar, controlled by Kuok’s nephew, earlier this month bought land in Liaoning in partnership with Kerry and Shangri-la, sparking a sell-off in its shares as investors questioned why an agricultural firm was diversifying into property.

So, what do you think?

Is this diversification natural?

Is there really no synergy?

I think the sell-out is just an over reaction.......

A Brand New Year-2011

The old year has gone, in is the New Year.


For me, I had my ups and downs. On reflections there were more ups then downs.

For the downs, I accept it in good faith and pile it on to experience.

God has been kind to me and my family in 2010. I uphold his Holy Name.

Praise the Lord!

Happy New Year!!

December 17, 2010

JCorp: Biting the Bullet?




Mohd Farhaan Shah and Risen Jayaseelan tell us about an impending debt at Johor Corp in the online STAR today. I have taken the liberty to abridge it accordingly to be brief.

Are there really viable options? Will Johor Corp bite the bullet?

New CEO of Johor Corp (JCorp), Kamaruzzaman Kassim said that the Corporation  will not be selling any of its assets to repay bondholders' RM3.6bil when the papers are due on July 31, 2012. That route is now out of the question,so it seems.

This is suppose to put a market dampener on speculation that key assets in the JCorp group, such as QSR Brands Bhd (that owns KFC Holdings (M) Bhd) and London-listed New Britain Palm Oil Ltd (NBPO), will be up for sale at any time soon.

Kamaruzzaman, named JCorp CEO last week confirmed that JCorp had appointed CIMB Bank and Maybank Investment Bhd as advisors.

Kamaruzzaman said that both these banks were the biggest lenders to JCorp. This means that both banks may own the bulk of the RM3.6bil bonds that are due in 2012. [Does it not remind you of the EPF-RHB thingy?]

The financial advisers apparently have suggested some ideas including the issuance of new bonds. [Expecting some form of haircut here?]

The CEO  has explained that the RM3.6bil debt was due to JCorp's aggressive investment since 2000, mainly in landed property and industrial areas.

JCorp has been in the news in recent weeks after it rejected two bids to take over QSR Brands Bhd. One was by a company linked to tycoon Tan Sri Halim Saad and another by the Carlyle Group.

While JCorp has a number of prized assets in the group, it doesn't own most of these assets directly. JCorp owns 53% of Kulim, which owns 50% of NBPO and 57.5% of QSR. QSR then owns 50.6% of KFC.

So if these assets were to be sold, the sale proceeds would be trapped at Kulim.

What that means is that if the money Kulim got from the sale of NBPO or QSR were to be paid out in dividends, JCorp would only get half of that, with Kulim's other shareholders enjoying the proceeds as well.

This is likely the main reason for JCorp opting not to divest its assets to repay the loan. When JCorp-controlled Kulim rejected the two bids, it said that it believed more value could be realised in QSR and KFC in the long run.

According to JCorp's 2009 annual report, it had RM705mil in cash but a whopping RM6.62bil in debt and with hardly any free cash flow.

It also paid around RM500mil in interest payments and RM1.7bil in loan repayments. Despite being perceived as asset rich, it only booked a paltry RM5mil in dividend receipts in financial year 2009.

So, it would be interesting for QSR and KFC shareholders what JCorp will do come 2012 when the bonds are due for payment. Will they be paying out bumper dividends  at QSR and KFC so that JCorp can survive a cash crunch? Good question.

JCorp is one of the country's largest state economic development authorities and has around 250 companies.

Rollover, Rover?

Bursar KL: Information for the Potential Retail Investor


Jagdev Singh Sidhu analyzed the buying and selling patterns of both local and foreign investors on Bursa KL throughout 2010 excluding December.

Here is his report from the online Star.

"Local retail investors have been net sellers of stock for all but one month up to November this year, but the pace of buying has slowly caught up with selling as the stock market rose towards its record high levels at the end of the year. [ So local investors are net sellers]

According to trade statistics from Bursa Malaysia, retailers bought RM8.93bil worth of stock in November and sold RM8.99bil worth of shares. In terms of purchases, the highest amount of shares bought or sold was in January when retailers bought shares worth RM9bil but sold RM9.1bil.

The pace of transactions declined thereafter but started to pick up in September when purchasers rose to RM5.58bil versus selling RM5.72bil worth of equity.

In October, buying and selling rose to RM7.57bil and RM7.73bil respectively and in November, when the FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI) hit a record 1,528 points, retailers bought RM8.93bil worth of shares and sold RM8.99bil worth.

The pace of purchases also reflected the monthly value of trade done on Bursa Malaysia. Data for December has not been released.

In terms of value, the highest month of transactions based on value was November when RM39bil worth of trade was conducted. The month also saw the entry of the largest IPO in the country, Petronas Chemicals Group Bhd, which attracted a great deal of interest among institutional investors.

The value of transactions has also mirrored the FBM KLCI’s ascendency to its new peak.

Total value of trade in October was RM36.5bil and RM31.6bil worth of share transactions were done in September.

Trade value has been consistently rising since July when total transactions were RM26.1bil. The value of transactions has somewhat tracked the rising amount of foreign investor interest in the stock market.

Foreign institutions have been net buyers of Malaysian shares since June but over the last couple of months, the amount of the net purchases by foreign institutions has been shrinking.

As foreign investors have been net buyers of Malaysian shares over the past 6 months, most of that extra liquidity or shares available for purchase has come from local institutions.

Local institutions have been net sellers of shares on Bursa Malaysia since June and only emerged as net buyers in November.[Sell low, buy high? Or have they bought into Petronas Chemical?]

One of the highest months of purchases by local institutions was in March when local funds bought RM12.8bil worth of stock and sold RM13.1bil in shares.

Total transactions by local institutions dipped thereafter but started to pick up once again in September when such funds bought RM9.7bil worth of shares and sold RM14bil worth.

The net selling gap then dropped as interest in Malaysian shares picked up again and in October, local institutions bought and sold RM12.8bil and RM14.2bil worth of shares.

In November, local funds reversed their selling trend of previous months when it bought RM12bil in stock and sold RM11.5bil in shares.

Foreign investors have also increased their buying of Malaysian shares in recent months and in August bought more shares than local institutions.

Foreign investors continued to buy more shares on Bursa Malaysia compared with local institutions in September but in October, as the market continued to charged towards its record high, local institutions poured more money into Malaysian shares compared with foreign institutions.

In November, local institutions’ purchase of stocks at RM12bil was higher than foreign institutional funds which snapped up RM11.5bil worth of shares."

So it looks like local buyers are net buyers for all months except in November. My guess is that the local buyers are just the same local funds particularly EPF, Pension Funds, SOCSO, Khazanah, ValueCap and so on and so forth. There is some action on some penny stocks that are dividend paying and  those affiliated with political interests.

That second liners are hardly moving is indicative that the common retail buyer is not in the market.