After thinking about it however, I decided to accept because the organisers have been kind enough to allow me to share my perspectives on “strength in diversity”, a subject which has great relevance for my firm, and is of great interest to me because I have always found the saying attractive yet the substance rather elusive.
At the recent Malaysian Law Conference I argued that the key strength and competitive edge of Malaysians and Malaysian companies lie in the diversity of our people and how they are able to operate across cultural, racial and religious barriers.
Consequently our people are highly sought after all across the world, and companies from Malaysia have been more successful internationally than those of any other Asean country.
Today, I would like to take this thought further. If diversity is our strength then we should nurture and celebrate diversity and methodically, as a nation, harness diversity as the competitive strength of our companies and of our nation.
One of the mega trends of our times is the increasing diversity of the societies we live in, the organisations we work in, and the clients and customers we serve. The world grows ever more inter-connected. This enables the diversification of global economic activity like never before; economic value is now created across value chains that span the globe and investment flows too, are becoming more diverse in their source.
Fifty years ago, flows were almost entirely from the developed to the developing world. Today, we’re seeing the rise of foreign direct investment from trans-national corporations (TNCs) from emerging and transitional economies.
A growing number of these TNCs are emerging as major regional, sometimes even global, players; and the links they are forming with the rest of the world are redefining the global corporate landscape.
Malaysia and Malaysians enter this fray with unique advantages, because in a very real way, diversity is our “home ground”. We are ourselves the product of successive waves of “globalisation” emanating from Asia well before the colonial era. Malaysia sits at the nexus of trade and travel between Southeast Asia, China and India.
The society that we know today is a product of the confluence of cultures, races and religions of peoples brought together in search of opportunity and security. Most of us grew up with diversity as a normal condition of life. Unlike many other societies, our ability to manage diversity is innate, our grasp of its challenges, instinctive.
There is thus great demand and scope for Malaysians in the new management landscape in which diversity is a key capacity.
Malaysia has been a beacon of stability for the past 50 years, some setbacks notwithstanding. Our success over these years has not been in spite of, but because of, our cultural diversity. But now the time has come to go beyond merely managing it, as if it were a problem, but actually tapping it for the power it is.
Diversity is not an accidental feature of Malaysia; and while some people may want it to go away, it is here to stay. We need to climb out of the confines of the view that race is always a problem to be managed with “race relations”, into the freedom of a new national mindset in which we all understand that diversity has become the distinctive economic advantage of our people, and we seek to systematically tap that advantage to make our mark in the global economic arena.
The value of diversity is well-understood in the business world. Diversity in portfolios can mitigate risk, diversity in the sales force translates into better client coverage and diversity in thinking broadens the range of our solutions. Diversity fosters the creativity and cultural adeptness needed to build and grow regional businesses.
CIMB has been a great beneficiary of Malaysian diversity.
Our organisation has grown from a predominantly Malaysian investment bank in 2005 into a leading Asean universal bank in just five years. Over this period our market capitalisation went from RM5 billion to RM50 billion; our staff strength has grown from 1,000 to over 36,000 and today, we have over 20 different nationalities within our ranks. Our customer profile too, has changed dramatically, both in number and geographical make-up – CIMB now serves over 10 million customers across Southeast Asia from large corporates to SMEs to individual retail clients.
The diversity of our people, and their very Malaysian ability to adapt to create value across a range of cultural settings, have been key to our success.
Most of you would have probably heard the joke that CIMB actually stands for Chinese, Indian, Malay Bank. We actually love the unofficial moniker, because it so aptly describes what we are. Jokes aside, CIMB really is an amalgamation of Chinese, Indian and Malay banks – Ban Hin Lee/Southern Bank, United Asian Bank and Bumiputra-Commerce Bank.
Hence CIMB is truly 1 Malaysia! CIMB today is an example of a truly Malaysian achievement. Our regional expansion has been built on a distinctively Malaysian ability to build an effective network across Asean, one of the most culturally complex regions in the world. Diversity has been an essential and productive component of our success.
When we merged Bank Bumiputra and Southern Bank four years ago, many said that it was impossible, that the respective working cultures were too different, and that the transition from the predominantly mono-racial setting of each entity into a combined multi-racial environment would be too combustible. Surely we have proven them wrong.
We have demonstrated beyond the shadow of a doubt that the integration of contrasting cultures, divergent methodologies and different values is not only possible but also a source of strength of our franchise today. That integration is held together by people with a distinctively Malaysian capacity to work across cultural difference.
For me, it was the experience of managing the Malaysian CIMB that enabled me to then build and lead a regional CIMB. Malaysia and this Malaysian capability were my bridge to the region. Thus a most Malaysian company has become possibly the truest Asean company. A made-in-Malaysia capability to manage and lead multi-racial and multi-cultural teams is now the kernel of our capacity to build a trans-national business across the larger diversity of Southeast Asia.
How do we nurture and take advantage of diversity? At CIMB we say that promoting diversity requires people to go against what comes naturally to them. We learn to identify our group and our personal biases and we tell our leaders to fight against them constantly.
As a personal example, when I took over the helm at CIMB, I resisted the tendency to surround myself with people who thought the same way as I did or with whom I was socially comfortable. Instead, I selected a very diverse management team, in age, race and gender, so that I could draw from our varied perspectives and arrive at better solutions than a homogenous team could have achieved.
Today, if I see an all-Chinese team, or an all-Malay team in the organisation, I ask why; and the leader of the team is set a target of diversification. I insist that at the office we only speak English or the national language (Bahasa Malaysia, Bahasa Indonesia, or Thai) to facilitate diversity.
We have a strongly meritocratic culture in regard of individual performance. This is a basic requirement of a talent-based competitive strategy that can hold its own against the best international competition.
The very same strategy, however, requires that we continually challenge ourselves to build diverse teams in which individual talent can find its best expression.
Group diversity is a goal in itself. The best universities and schools in the world have policies in place to foster diverse academic communities because they know that a more diverse population is likely to be more interesting and more creative.
The demands of meritocracy are balanced with the requirements of diversity and inclusion to create communities that are in fact more productive. Individual merit alone does not get the work done. Results are created by teams, and diverse teams tend to be better teams. In our entry level recruitment we set a specific goal of increasing bumiputra talent so that we have a bigger pool to rebalance our teams at the managerial levels.
Is this NEP at work? Yes. But does it conflict with good business strategy? No. And one day, if the bumiputra content is too high, you may see a policy of higher Chinese or Indian intakes.
From CIMB’s point of view, to serve a multicultural and multi-racial client base, its staff and its leadership too, have to be equally diverse, because our success is ultimately predicated on how well we understand and provide for the needs of our clients.
Diversity and economic transformation (1 Malaysia and the NEM).
The unstoppable forces of globalisation, and the eastward shift of the global economy’s centre of gravity, are playing into our hands. The global economic game is moving onto our home turf. The need to rebalance global trade requires that emerging economies find ways to expand domestic markets, and we find that our backyard is Asean, with its population of 580 million people, that is our true domestic market.
Emerging economies need to participate in the economic resurgence of China and India, and we find that we are located not just geographically, but also culturally, at the meeting point between the South China Sea and the Indian Ocean. We are a lucky country, but we need to do a few things before we can realise our luck.
In recent months the political discourse in our country has become more racial than I ever remember. I hope it is merely the dying spasms of retrograde worldviews, a reflection of anxiety at imminent structural change that we know in our hearts must and can happen; structural change that would catapult us from our present uncertainty to the fore of economic competitiveness.
We need an economic transformation that harnesses the energies of our diversity to our competitive advantage. We are in critical need of a New Economic Model.
Malaysia has the largest number of successful home-grown trans-nationals in Asean. Using the example I know best, I have tried to suggest why this is so, and how it is testimony of the value of our diversity. Malaysian companies are successful abroad because of capacities born of a diverse society. Let us, in pursuing a new economic model, build on that success.
The New Economic Model should leverage our diversity in a methodical way by providing support for more Malaysian companies to expand regionally. What has worked for CIMB and Axiata, YTL and AirAsia can work for Malaysia. Such companies draw on the talent of Malaysians wherever they are located. This, concretely, is how we tap the advantage of having Asean as our backyard. We need even more Malaysian companies, even at the SME level to go trans-national. They can.
So I look forward to the NEM creating a framework for spurring growth and the proliferation of Malaysian trans-national companies: It is not, for instance, clear today how private companies can access co-investment capital or other government support in their international activities.
To state the obvious, the Malaysian Chinese community has a crucial role to play in this strategy. You are no strangers to regional business networks. That network, however, is becoming increasingly diverse, open, international and competitive. Embrace diversity; work with all communities, not only in formal compliance with affirmative action but in building, shoulder to shoulder with them, the regional companies of the future.
Our new and positive mindset about our diversity, expressed as “1 Malaysia”, must be harnessed and developed in the New Economic Model as an engine for the regional growth of the Malaysian economy.
The vehicle for this is the company of the future, a future being built in our region and in which we have a key role to play because if we put our efforts together as Malaysians we have a real talent for building the region’s most successful trans-national companies. These companies can in turn anchor our centrality in the new pathways of global economic activity developing around us.
So, can we really put our best foot out for diversity?
That should be the challenge to the current government. Do you dare lead?
August 17, 2010
GenM-NY Racino in the Bag?
Genting Malaysia Bhd’s unit Genting New York LLC, which has won the bid to operate a video lottery terminal facility in New York, plans to invest US$1.3bil (RM4.19bil) in the project. So is this good for minority shareholders?
Currently, Genting Malaysia has also been on a roadshow ahead of its EGM to drum up support for its plans to acquire Genting Singapore plc’s whole UK casino operations for £340mil (RM1.7bil).
The EGM is on Aug 24, and Genting Malaysia wants to ensure it has enough support to ensure the deal goes through. That will be no problem with the big boys at Gentings. Their network will do the 'deed'. So the EGM for the takeover of GentingUK is a fait accompli.
This means that whatever is left in the reserve coffers will be pilfered and frittered down to do up the racino project. So GenM minority shareholders-you are the real suckers and whipping boys. Another feather for the Genting big boss!
Now back to our story. Apparently, Genting New York had signed the agreement last week but only made the announcement in New York yesterday. That is why they were feeding like crazy over here at the Bursar for GenM shares,like hogs so it seems.
I think just like it the Sentosa Resort world case, expect overruns. Already some USD380million has gone kaput to save the city. According to a copy of the proposal submitted by Genting to the New York lottery authority, Genting New York will pay a licensing fee of US$380mil (RM1.22bil), above the minimum US$300mil (RM966mil) required by the city of Aqueduct, NY.
As the planning goes,Genting New York intends to spend a further US$350mil to develop the facility, which upon full completion will span 413,000 sq ft and contain more than 4,500 video lottery terminals or electronic slot machines.
Dubbed Resorts World New York, the proposed three-storey facility will also contain several restaurants, water features, an outdoor terrace connected to the Aqueduct racetrack which will be able to accommodate up to 10,000 people and a 2,200-bay car park.
Genting New York aims to complete the entire development within 12 months from the date it obtains formal approval from the state to proceed.
As part of a wider development plan, Genting New York is also proposing to build three hotels of differing standards, shopping, recreation, spa and other resort facilities at a total cost of US$650mil (RM2.09bil). That will take the proposed outlay for the entire project to over US$1.3bil.
Presently, Genting Bhd owns 47.33% of Genting Malaysia. On Tuesday, Genting Malaysia rose to its year-high of RM3.11 and closed the day at RM2.99, 17 sen up. Genting Singapore closed S$1.52 (RM3.58).
Genting Bhd, parent to both Genting Malaysia and Genting Singapore Plc, rose 21 sen to RM8.93, a three-year high.
The shares of all three stocks have rallied since Genting Singapore reported a second quarter profit on Aug 12 after opening a casino resort in the city-state.
Meanwhile, some shareholders have not been happy with Genting Malaysia’s plan to acquire the UK casino operations as it is viewed as a related party transaction. Furthermore, they feel the acquisition price is high compared to its current value.
“Genting Malaysia is saying that they are buying the UK operations cheaper. After all, in 2006, Genting Singapore acquired Genting UK for £699.4mil. Furthermore, they see growth in Genting UK,” said one analyst who met up with Genting Malaysia’s management.
For £340mil, Genting Malaysia will get 44 casino licences for the UK operations, as well as properties with a net book value of £289mil (RM1.45bil), not inclusive revaluation gains.
The analyst, however, cautioned that the operating environment in the UK was still tough. In recent years, the casino market has been affected by legislation, including a smoking ban in enclosed public areas. Gaming operators are also now imposed with higher taxes. Hence, the underlying value of the casinos could be lower than the £340mil paid, according to the analyst.
As you can see, even the analysts are cautious of this UK deal. Aren't you?
Labels:
Stocks
August 16, 2010
Double Jeopardy
Well, what do you know?
Just when you think it is time to leave dullards on the Bursa like GenM when it springs back to life and climbed to high heaven.
I have been holding onto this stock for about 7 years now and this could possibly be the second time that it has scaled the RM3 mark.
Strangely, with a reserve bleeding proposal in the works comes this EGM to buy GentingUK, yet some people have seen it fit to push GenM up.
I could see the relevance of Genting Berhad moving up but never in my mind could I fathom that GenM could also be pushed up.
I regret selling at RM2.86 it to buy some other stocks which has slided down since. It has climbed as high as RM3.11 and they are still in frenzy feeding mode right now.
True Murphy's Law in operation.
For me, it was double jeopardy and a big loss.
PS:
Well, the news is out. It was a Treasury buy-in by GenM itself that pushed up the share price. They started buying big from RM2.99 onwards. I guess they wanted more shareholders out of the market before they meet on 24 August to screamed the house down on GenM management's 'senseless' purchase of Genting UK.
RHB Securities report parred down the potential of the racino project as well saying that the fair price of GenM is only RM3.03.
Just when you think it is time to leave dullards on the Bursa like GenM when it springs back to life and climbed to high heaven.
I have been holding onto this stock for about 7 years now and this could possibly be the second time that it has scaled the RM3 mark.
Strangely, with a reserve bleeding proposal in the works comes this EGM to buy GentingUK, yet some people have seen it fit to push GenM up.
I could see the relevance of Genting Berhad moving up but never in my mind could I fathom that GenM could also be pushed up.
I regret selling at RM2.86 it to buy some other stocks which has slided down since. It has climbed as high as RM3.11 and they are still in frenzy feeding mode right now.
True Murphy's Law in operation.
For me, it was double jeopardy and a big loss.
PS:
Well, the news is out. It was a Treasury buy-in by GenM itself that pushed up the share price. They started buying big from RM2.99 onwards. I guess they wanted more shareholders out of the market before they meet on 24 August to screamed the house down on GenM management's 'senseless' purchase of Genting UK.
RHB Securities report parred down the potential of the racino project as well saying that the fair price of GenM is only RM3.03.
Labels:
Stocks
The Sun Set on Japan as China Overtakes....
It's confirmed.
Japan has lost its place to China as the world's No. 2 economy in the second quarter of 2010 as receding global growth sapped momentum and stunted a shaky recovery.
Gross domestic product grew at an annualized rate of a miserly 0.4 percent, the government said Monday, far below expectations of 2.3 percent growth as projected in a Kyodo news agency survey.
The figures underscore China's emergence as an economic power that is changing everything from the global balance of military and financial power to how cars are designed. It is already the biggest exporter, auto buyer and steel producer, and its worldwide influence is growing. The juggernaut is steamrolling.
Apparently, China has surpassed Japan in quarterly GDP figures before but its passing of Japan in the second quarter is likely to mark the period in which the lead became insurmountable.
China's economy will almost certainly be bigger than Japan's at the end of 2010 because of the big difference in each country's growth rates. China is growing at about 10 percent a year while Japan's economy is forecast to grow 3 percent this year.
Japan's nominal GDP, which isn't adjusted for price and seasonal variations, was worth $1.286 trillion in the April-to-June quarter compared with $1.335 trillion for China. The figures are converted into dollars based on an average exchange rate for the quarter.
Japan has held the No. 2 spot after the U.S. since 1968, when it overtook West Germany. From the ashes of World War II, the country rose to become a global manufacturing and financial powerhouse. But its so-called "economic miracle" turned into a massive real estate bubble in the 1980s before imploding in 1991.
What followed next was a decade of stagnant growth and economic malaise from which the country never really recovered. Prime Minister Naoto Kan now faces a long list of daunting problems: a rapidly aging and shrinking population, persistently weak domestic demand, deflation, a strong yen and slowing growth in key export markets.
In contrast, China's growth has been spectacular, its voracious appetite fueling demand for resources, machinery and products from the developing world as well as rich economies like Japan and Australia. China is Japan's top trading partner and has been key in Japan's recovery from the global recession.
But China's rise has produced glaring contradictions. The wealth gap between an elite who profited most from three decades of reform and its poor majority is so extreme that China has dozens of billionaires while average income for the rest of its 1.3 billion people is among the world's lowest.
Japan's people still are among the world's richest, with a per capita income of $37,800 last year, compared with China's $3,600. So are Americans at $42,240, their economy still by far the biggest.
"We should be concerned about per capita GDP," said Kyohei Morita, chief economist at Barclays Capital in Tokyo. China overtaking Japan "is just symbolic," he said. "It's nothing more than that."
On a quarterly basis, Japan's GDP — or the total value of the nation's goods and services — grew 0.1 percent from the January-March period, the Cabinet Office said.
Consumer spending, which accounts for about 60 percent of GDP, was flat from the previous quarter, the figures showed. Capital spending by companies rose 0.5 percent, while public investment fell 3.4 percent.
"We are now seeing a pause of growth, especially on the domestic side," said Masamichi Adachi, senior economist at JPMorgan Securities Japan.
The outlook for this third is uncertain. Private consumption appears to be solid so far, helped in part by unusually hot weather, Adachi said. But a cooling global economy is dampening exports and production.
A stronger yen, which hit a 15-year high against the dollar last week, also poses a major risk for the country's export-driven economy. Yen appreciation reduces the value of repatriated profits for companies like Toyota Motor Corp. and Sony Corp. and makes their products more expensive abroad.
The currency worries led Finance Minister Yoshihiko Noda to say last week that he is closely monitoring foreign exchange rates. Bank of Japan Gov. Masaaki Shirakawa released a similar statement to try to calm markets.
Labels:
Perspectives
August 15, 2010
Walla! Genting at RM20?
Genting Bhd, which holds a 52% stake in Genting Singapore PLC, has been re-rated to a stong buy by Shayne Heffernan of Ebeling Heffernan based on an impressive second-quarter profit performance of S$396.5mil, compared with a loss a year earlier.
Shayne Heffernan put a RM 20 price target on the stock currently trading at M8.18
Genting Singapore’s (formerly Genting International Public Ltd) revenue surged to S$979.3mil in the three months to June 30, compared with S$120.1mil previously boosted by improved earnings from its new RM4.7bil integrated casino resort, Resorts World Sentosa.
Genting Singapore (GENS) has raked in almost S$1 billion in revenue for the second quarter with net profit coming in at close to S$400 million.
For the quarter ended June 30 – the first full quarter with Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) contributing to the bottom line – GENS reported revenue of S$979 million, up from just S$120 million a year ago.
Net profit in the quarter also increased significantly to S$397 million, up from a loss of S$50.7 million a year ago. These numbers simply flew past market expectations.
GENS said that RWS alone recorded revenue of S$860.8 million in Q2. It added that earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda) of S$503.5 million for the quarter represented an Ebitda margin of 58 per cent, ‘at the back of higher than industry average win percentage in the premium players market’.
At its Universal Studios Singapore, daily maximum capacity has increased to about 8,000 with an average visitor spend of S$84 while hotel occupancy at RWS was 70 per cent with an average room rate of S$263.
The number of foreigners visiting RWS also appears to be increasing. Previously, analysts had estimated that Singaporeans made up about 40 per cent of the visitors to the RWS casino. In a press statement released yesterday, GENS president and chief operating officer Tan Hee Teck said the results were ‘powered by overseas arrivals’.
He said: ‘The Singapore Tourism Board (STB) has been doing a good job and the whole tourism industry has been on a buoyant spin. Two-thirds of the visitors to the casino, for example, come from overseas. Many of them include Universal Studios Singapore and Voyage de la Vie (RWS’s resident theatre show) in their itineraries.’
OCBC Investment Research analyst Carey Wong said that GENS’ performance was ‘a lot stronger than expected on the topline’.
‘It suggests that the Singapore market is a lot bigger than what people were expecting,’ he added.
Mr Wong also noted that the opening of Marina Bay Sands (MBS) in the quarter did little to cannibalise customers. ‘Let’s be honest – within such a small place, gamers tend to flit from one to the other. Hence cooperative competition is benefiting both,’ he said.
Vincent Khoo, UOB Kay Hian’s head of research for Malaysia, was also pleasantly surprised by GENS’ performance, describing it as ‘astoundingly strong’.
Indeed, GENS Q2 performance seems to put it on track to hit more bullish full-year earnings targets.
While there has been no consensus on how well Singapore’s nascent gaming market will perform, bullish estimates for total gaming revenue for both RWS and MBS combined have been around US$3 billion, suggesting that both casinos register combined daily gaming revenue of S$11-12 million.
A DBS Vickers report released this week estimated that MBS’s first 65 days of operations saw daily gross win of US$4 million while RWS saw US$4.9 million daily for its first 45 days.
GENS did not reveal its gaming revenue for the quarter. However, based on RWS’s total revenue of S$860.8 million for Q2, average daily revenue works out to about S$9.45 million.
GENS’ UK casino operations registered revenue of S$104.9 million for the quarter, a decrease of 3 per cent year-on-year while Ebitda fell 25 per cent to S$9.1 million.
In July, GENS announced that it was seeking to divest its UK operations.
Earnings per share for the six months ended June 30 was nil compared to a loss of 0.8 cent in the corresponding period a year ago.
So do you want to climb on board at RM8.18?
Labels:
Stocks
August 14, 2010
Is the Genting Juggernaut Feeding?
Whatever news it was that fuel the buying frenzy for Genting Berhad did not really matter from hindsight. Was it the fantastic revenue from the 2nd Q of 2010 for RWS or was it the 'almost in the bag' NY Racino project bidding?
Truth be told, the buyers came out from the woodwork and devour fervishly until the counter ended up 48 sen to RM8.18 at its close on 13 August.
AmResearch has reportedly raised its FY10F net profit forecast for Genting Berhad to RM2.8 billion from RM1.3 billion due to higher contributions from Genting Singapore.
'New fair value for Genting Bhd is RM10.67/share versus RM7.66/share previously,' it said.
Will there be a price shoulder build above RM8.00 so that there will be a breather before Genting climbs purportedly to the new price of RM10.67?
This we will have to see.
Labels:
Stocks
Strength in diversity, beyond the Rhetoric
This is a very interesting speech by Nazir Razak, brother of the current PM.
His speech, while confined to corporate directions do have lessons for Najib Razak to bring beyond corporate boundaries. Cut the rhetoric, PM and be your own man.
As the Bard says, " To thine own self, be true."
I so wish that this kind of speech be provided on a national platform with an action plan to follow that do not pander to the wishes of opportunists and extremists.
I am sure this speech by Nazir Razak will be dissected and put under the national microscope by the policy holders for the vaue it really is and has to offer.
This is Nazir.
" It gives me great pleasure to address all of you here today. I must confess that when I was invited to speak at this forum with the theme: "The Role of the Chinese Community in Achieving the NEM”, my initial thoughts revolved around how to politely decline, for I have neither the oratory prowess of a politician or any direct involvement in the NEM or the 10th Plan for that matter to speak on them with any authority.
Labels:
Perspectives
August 13, 2010
Go! Go! Go! Axiata
Yes, that's the way to go about it. Refinance your debt whenever you can. Take advantage of longer payback periods and lower fund costs. Hopefully, minority shareholders will benefit on the long -run from these deft market maneuvers.
And so this week,we have an announcement that Axiata,owner of Malaysia’s second-biggest mobile phone operator, has deferred an Islamic bond sale to the week beginning Aug. 16 to complete documentation, according to a person familiar with the matter.What gives?
It plans to sell RM4.2 billion (US$1.3 billion) of five-, seven- and 10-year sukuk to refinance debt, and the greatest news of all-walla! the Employees Provident Fund (EPF)will buy most of the notes.How convenient!
Axiata, Malaysia’s best-performing index stock this year, has RM6.7 billion of group bonds and loans due to mature through 2020, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. It raised US$300 million in April from its first sale of dollar notes.
So let us hope that Axiata's share prices will move beyond RM5.20 because that is the price the shareholders have been saddled with after TMI split away from TM some years back. From RM8.80, the share price fell after a billion payback to parent TM and the news of an impending rights killed whatever was left of TMI's goodwill.
Those who successfully subscribed for excess shares or bought it at low, low prices are just beginning to see some worthwhile pofits now. I do hope the latest Axiata's corporate maneuvers can bring it back to its heydays as a market leader!
We await the return of the phoenix!
And so this week,we have an announcement that Axiata,owner of Malaysia’s second-biggest mobile phone operator, has deferred an Islamic bond sale to the week beginning Aug. 16 to complete documentation, according to a person familiar with the matter.What gives?
It plans to sell RM4.2 billion (US$1.3 billion) of five-, seven- and 10-year sukuk to refinance debt, and the greatest news of all-walla! the Employees Provident Fund (EPF)will buy most of the notes.How convenient!
Axiata, Malaysia’s best-performing index stock this year, has RM6.7 billion of group bonds and loans due to mature through 2020, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. It raised US$300 million in April from its first sale of dollar notes.
So let us hope that Axiata's share prices will move beyond RM5.20 because that is the price the shareholders have been saddled with after TMI split away from TM some years back. From RM8.80, the share price fell after a billion payback to parent TM and the news of an impending rights killed whatever was left of TMI's goodwill.
Those who successfully subscribed for excess shares or bought it at low, low prices are just beginning to see some worthwhile pofits now. I do hope the latest Axiata's corporate maneuvers can bring it back to its heydays as a market leader!
We await the return of the phoenix!
Labels:
Stocks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)